OT: Maybe this is a dumb question

[Djshakes]

[quote=pri_dk]
Then why has not a single Republican politician said as much?[/quote]

So if they say anything about it they are damned for feeding into it and if they don’t mention it (because frankly it isn’t worth mentioning) they are damned. Do you go around talking about every stupid thing you heard on the street?

[quote=pri_dk]
Really?

On April 27, FoxNews.com posted the banner headline “White House Releases What It Says Is President Obama’s Long-Form Birth Certificate.”

“what it says?” – how lame is that? Qualifying a statement by the Commander in Chief (and the state government of Hawaii) with “what he claims?”

And if the issue is not that important, then why is the Republican party leadership (i.e. the Fox News staff) talking about it so much?[/quote]
I’m sorry, I guess when the president holds a press conference they shouldn’t cover it.
[quote=pri_dk]
http://mediamatters.org/research/201104270037?newsref=www.eschatonblog.com%5B/quote%5D

You’re really quoting media matters?

[quote=pri_dk]
They don’t support Palin? They nominated her for the friggin Vice President of the United States. How much more can you support someone?[/quote]

I’m sorry, are we talking about today or four years ago when she was an unknown that came on the scene?

[Anonymous]

[quote=Djshakes]So if they say anything about it they are damned for feeding into it and if they don’t mention it (because frankly it isn’t worth mentioning) they are damned.[/quote]
“Dammed if he responds to it, damned if he doesn’t.”

Gee where have I heard that one before?

[quote=pri_dk]I’m sorry, are we talking about today or four [?] years ago when she was an unknown that came on the scene?[/quote]
“Came on the scene?” Are talking about a Kardashian?

Or are we talking about someone who was chosen, over dozens of qualified people, as the top candidate for one of the most significant political positions in the country?

Do you understand the difference?

So if Palin’s not your gal anymore, who are you supporting these days?

(Lemme guess…I won’t get a response until after you are told the answer during today’s talk-radio broadcast.)

[Anonymous]

[quote=Djshakes]So if they say anything about it they are damned for feeding into it and if they don’t mention it (because frankly it isn’t worth mentioning) they are damned.[/quote]
“Dammed if he responds to it, damned if he doesn’t.”

Gee where have I heard that one before?

[quote=pri_dk]I’m sorry, are we talking about today or four [?] years ago when she was an unknown that came on the scene?[/quote]
“Came on the scene?” Are talking about a Kardashian?

Or are we talking about someone who was chosen, over dozens of qualified people, as the top candidate for one of the most significant political positions in the country?

Do you understand the difference?

So if Palin’s not your gal anymore, who are you supporting these days?

(Lemme guess…I won’t get a response until after you are told the answer during today’s talk-radio broadcast.)

[Anonymous]

[quote=Djshakes]So if they say anything about it they are damned for feeding into it and if they don’t mention it (because frankly it isn’t worth mentioning) they are damned.[/quote]
“Dammed if he responds to it, damned if he doesn’t.”

Gee where have I heard that one before?

[quote=pri_dk]I’m sorry, are we talking about today or four [?] years ago when she was an unknown that came on the scene?[/quote]
“Came on the scene?” Are talking about a Kardashian?

Or are we talking about someone who was chosen, over dozens of qualified people, as the top candidate for one of the most significant political positions in the country?

Do you understand the difference?

So if Palin’s not your gal anymore, who are you supporting these days?

(Lemme guess…I won’t get a response until after you are told the answer during today’s talk-radio broadcast.)

[Anonymous]

[quote=Djshakes]So if they say anything about it they are damned for feeding into it and if they don’t mention it (because frankly it isn’t worth mentioning) they are damned.[/quote]
“Dammed if he responds to it, damned if he doesn’t.”

Gee where have I heard that one before?

[quote=pri_dk]I’m sorry, are we talking about today or four [?] years ago when she was an unknown that came on the scene?[/quote]
“Came on the scene?” Are talking about a Kardashian?

Or are we talking about someone who was chosen, over dozens of qualified people, as the top candidate for one of the most significant political positions in the country?

Do you understand the difference?

So if Palin’s not your gal anymore, who are you supporting these days?

(Lemme guess…I won’t get a response until after you are told the answer during today’s talk-radio broadcast.)

[Anonymous]

[quote=Djshakes]So if they say anything about it they are damned for feeding into it and if they don’t mention it (because frankly it isn’t worth mentioning) they are damned.[/quote]
“Dammed if he responds to it, damned if he doesn’t.”

Gee where have I heard that one before?

[quote=pri_dk]I’m sorry, are we talking about today or four [?] years ago when she was an unknown that came on the scene?[/quote]
“Came on the scene?” Are talking about a Kardashian?

Or are we talking about someone who was chosen, over dozens of qualified people, as the top candidate for one of the most significant political positions in the country?

Do you understand the difference?

So if Palin’s not your gal anymore, who are you supporting these days?

(Lemme guess…I won’t get a response until after you are told the answer during today’s talk-radio broadcast.)

[Anonymous]

[quote=jstoesz]Got to love data.[/quote]
I do love data.

But your link has none to support your bogus association between the left and the truthers.

The smoke is just getting thicker.

[Anonymous]

[quote=jstoesz]Got to love data.[/quote]
I do love data.

But your link has none to support your bogus association between the left and the truthers.

The smoke is just getting thicker.

[Anonymous]

[quote=jstoesz]Got to love data.[/quote]
I do love data.

But your link has none to support your bogus association between the left and the truthers.

The smoke is just getting thicker.

[Anonymous]

[quote=jstoesz]Got to love data.[/quote]
I do love data.

But your link has none to support your bogus association between the left and the truthers.

The smoke is just getting thicker.

[Anonymous]

[quote=jstoesz]Got to love data.[/quote]
I do love data.

But your link has none to support your bogus association between the left and the truthers.

The smoke is just getting thicker.

[Djshakes]

[quote=pri_dk][quote=Djshakes]So if they say anything about it they are damned for feeding into it and if they don’t mention it (because frankly it isn’t worth mentioning) they are damned.[/quote]
“Dammed if he responds to it, damned if he doesn’t.”

Gee where have I heard that one before?

[quote=pri_dk]I’m sorry, are we talking about today or four [?] years ago when she was an unknown that came on the scene?[/quote]
“Came on the scene?” Are talking about a Kardashian?

Or are we talking about someone who was chosen, over dozens of qualified people, as the top candidate for one of the most significant political positions in the country?

Do you understand the difference?

So if Palin’s not your gal anymore, who are you supporting these days?

(Lemme guess…I won’t get a response until after you are told the answer during today’s talk-radio broadcast.)[/quote]

I know exactly what you mean. Palin was so well known by the public before the campaign. You can’t be serious about this? Clearly over the past four years since the campaign she has had much more coverage bringing her politics to the limelight.

The problem is there is no worthy candidate of the republican party to support.

[Djshakes]

[quote=pri_dk][quote=Djshakes]So if they say anything about it they are damned for feeding into it and if they don’t mention it (because frankly it isn’t worth mentioning) they are damned.[/quote]
“Dammed if he responds to it, damned if he doesn’t.”

Gee where have I heard that one before?

[quote=pri_dk]I’m sorry, are we talking about today or four [?] years ago when she was an unknown that came on the scene?[/quote]
“Came on the scene?” Are talking about a Kardashian?

Or are we talking about someone who was chosen, over dozens of qualified people, as the top candidate for one of the most significant political positions in the country?

Do you understand the difference?

So if Palin’s not your gal anymore, who are you supporting these days?

(Lemme guess…I won’t get a response until after you are told the answer during today’s talk-radio broadcast.)[/quote]

I know exactly what you mean. Palin was so well known by the public before the campaign. You can’t be serious about this? Clearly over the past four years since the campaign she has had much more coverage bringing her politics to the limelight.

The problem is there is no worthy candidate of the republican party to support.

[Djshakes]

[quote=pri_dk][quote=Djshakes]So if they say anything about it they are damned for feeding into it and if they don’t mention it (because frankly it isn’t worth mentioning) they are damned.[/quote]
“Dammed if he responds to it, damned if he doesn’t.”

Gee where have I heard that one before?

[quote=pri_dk]I’m sorry, are we talking about today or four [?] years ago when she was an unknown that came on the scene?[/quote]
“Came on the scene?” Are talking about a Kardashian?

Or are we talking about someone who was chosen, over dozens of qualified people, as the top candidate for one of the most significant political positions in the country?

Do you understand the difference?

So if Palin’s not your gal anymore, who are you supporting these days?

(Lemme guess…I won’t get a response until after you are told the answer during today’s talk-radio broadcast.)[/quote]

I know exactly what you mean. Palin was so well known by the public before the campaign. You can’t be serious about this? Clearly over the past four years since the campaign she has had much more coverage bringing her politics to the limelight.

The problem is there is no worthy candidate of the republican party to support.

[Djshakes]

[quote=pri_dk][quote=Djshakes]So if they say anything about it they are damned for feeding into it and if they don’t mention it (because frankly it isn’t worth mentioning) they are damned.[/quote]
“Dammed if he responds to it, damned if he doesn’t.”

Gee where have I heard that one before?

[quote=pri_dk]I’m sorry, are we talking about today or four [?] years ago when she was an unknown that came on the scene?[/quote]
“Came on the scene?” Are talking about a Kardashian?

Or are we talking about someone who was chosen, over dozens of qualified people, as the top candidate for one of the most significant political positions in the country?

Do you understand the difference?

So if Palin’s not your gal anymore, who are you supporting these days?

(Lemme guess…I won’t get a response until after you are told the answer during today’s talk-radio broadcast.)[/quote]

I know exactly what you mean. Palin was so well known by the public before the campaign. You can’t be serious about this? Clearly over the past four years since the campaign she has had much more coverage bringing her politics to the limelight.

The problem is there is no worthy candidate of the republican party to support.

[Author]

Posts