- This topic has 395 replies, 31 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 6 months ago by
eavesdropper.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 28, 2011 at 11:12 AM #691210April 28, 2011 at 11:51 AM #690049
jstoesz
Participant[quote=SK in CV][quote=jstoesz]you guys are killing me…
Do you think for one second that the aggregate republicans are any dumber than the aggregate democrats?
You hold up the ignorant conspiracy birthers on the right as some shining example of stupidity, but what about the 911 truthers (or whatever they are called)?
What about the inner city welfare queens, the white trash dole subsister? The fact is much of the american populace is not too impressively intelligent.
This onesided narcissism is killing me. If we realize that most people are not too intelligent about politics, isn’t that a powerful example of the need for limited government? After all I do not want some know nothing democrat or republican affecting my life…[/quote]
I’ve only noticed one poster making references to republicans being dumber than democrats, so the “you guys” is a gross generalization.
And the false equivilence you’ve made between the birthers and 911truthers is simply not credible. This morning’s news brought polling results showing only 38% of Republicans believe Obama was born in the US. The 911truthers never had ANY traction, among democrats or others. Not a single elected federal politician gave it the time of day, unless they were assailing it. The press barely did. The 911truth thing was seen by most as unquestionable stupidity. The birther thing, not so much among Republicans.
They do it too fails miserably.[/quote]
You should do some research on the issue.
April 28, 2011 at 11:51 AM #690118Participant[quote=SK in CV][quote=jstoesz]you guys are killing me…
Do you think for one second that the aggregate republicans are any dumber than the aggregate democrats?
You hold up the ignorant conspiracy birthers on the right as some shining example of stupidity, but what about the 911 truthers (or whatever they are called)?
What about the inner city welfare queens, the white trash dole subsister? The fact is much of the american populace is not too impressively intelligent.
This onesided narcissism is killing me. If we realize that most people are not too intelligent about politics, isn’t that a powerful example of the need for limited government? After all I do not want some know nothing democrat or republican affecting my life…[/quote]
I’ve only noticed one poster making references to republicans being dumber than democrats, so the “you guys” is a gross generalization.
And the false equivilence you’ve made between the birthers and 911truthers is simply not credible. This morning’s news brought polling results showing only 38% of Republicans believe Obama was born in the US. The 911truthers never had ANY traction, among democrats or others. Not a single elected federal politician gave it the time of day, unless they were assailing it. The press barely did. The 911truth thing was seen by most as unquestionable stupidity. The birther thing, not so much among Republicans.
They do it too fails miserably.[/quote]
You should do some research on the issue.
April 28, 2011 at 11:51 AM #690731Participant[quote=SK in CV][quote=jstoesz]you guys are killing me…
Do you think for one second that the aggregate republicans are any dumber than the aggregate democrats?
You hold up the ignorant conspiracy birthers on the right as some shining example of stupidity, but what about the 911 truthers (or whatever they are called)?
What about the inner city welfare queens, the white trash dole subsister? The fact is much of the american populace is not too impressively intelligent.
This onesided narcissism is killing me. If we realize that most people are not too intelligent about politics, isn’t that a powerful example of the need for limited government? After all I do not want some know nothing democrat or republican affecting my life…[/quote]
I’ve only noticed one poster making references to republicans being dumber than democrats, so the “you guys” is a gross generalization.
And the false equivilence you’ve made between the birthers and 911truthers is simply not credible. This morning’s news brought polling results showing only 38% of Republicans believe Obama was born in the US. The 911truthers never had ANY traction, among democrats or others. Not a single elected federal politician gave it the time of day, unless they were assailing it. The press barely did. The 911truth thing was seen by most as unquestionable stupidity. The birther thing, not so much among Republicans.
They do it too fails miserably.[/quote]
You should do some research on the issue.
April 28, 2011 at 11:51 AM #690875Participant[quote=SK in CV][quote=jstoesz]you guys are killing me…
Do you think for one second that the aggregate republicans are any dumber than the aggregate democrats?
You hold up the ignorant conspiracy birthers on the right as some shining example of stupidity, but what about the 911 truthers (or whatever they are called)?
What about the inner city welfare queens, the white trash dole subsister? The fact is much of the american populace is not too impressively intelligent.
This onesided narcissism is killing me. If we realize that most people are not too intelligent about politics, isn’t that a powerful example of the need for limited government? After all I do not want some know nothing democrat or republican affecting my life…[/quote]
I’ve only noticed one poster making references to republicans being dumber than democrats, so the “you guys” is a gross generalization.
And the false equivilence you’ve made between the birthers and 911truthers is simply not credible. This morning’s news brought polling results showing only 38% of Republicans believe Obama was born in the US. The 911truthers never had ANY traction, among democrats or others. Not a single elected federal politician gave it the time of day, unless they were assailing it. The press barely did. The 911truth thing was seen by most as unquestionable stupidity. The birther thing, not so much among Republicans.
They do it too fails miserably.[/quote]
You should do some research on the issue.
April 28, 2011 at 11:51 AM #691224Participant[quote=SK in CV][quote=jstoesz]you guys are killing me…
Do you think for one second that the aggregate republicans are any dumber than the aggregate democrats?
You hold up the ignorant conspiracy birthers on the right as some shining example of stupidity, but what about the 911 truthers (or whatever they are called)?
What about the inner city welfare queens, the white trash dole subsister? The fact is much of the american populace is not too impressively intelligent.
This onesided narcissism is killing me. If we realize that most people are not too intelligent about politics, isn’t that a powerful example of the need for limited government? After all I do not want some know nothing democrat or republican affecting my life…[/quote]
I’ve only noticed one poster making references to republicans being dumber than democrats, so the “you guys” is a gross generalization.
And the false equivilence you’ve made between the birthers and 911truthers is simply not credible. This morning’s news brought polling results showing only 38% of Republicans believe Obama was born in the US. The 911truthers never had ANY traction, among democrats or others. Not a single elected federal politician gave it the time of day, unless they were assailing it. The press barely did. The 911truth thing was seen by most as unquestionable stupidity. The birther thing, not so much among Republicans.
They do it too fails miserably.[/quote]
You should do some research on the issue.
April 28, 2011 at 12:01 PM #690059Anonymous
Guest[quote=jstoesz]You should do some research on the issue.
[link][/quote]The movement draws adherents from people of diverse political beliefs including liberals, conservatives, and libertarians.
Are you trying to move the goalposts, or are you just totally missing the point?
Speaking of conspiracy theories and moving goalposts:
[…] he managed to be detained by police twice during his university years: once for stealing a Christmas wreath as a fraternity prank and once for trying to tear down the goalposts […]
Be sure to include the WHOLE article when you cut/paste and spam it to your friends!
April 28, 2011 at 12:01 PM #690128Guest[quote=jstoesz]You should do some research on the issue.
[link][/quote]The movement draws adherents from people of diverse political beliefs including liberals, conservatives, and libertarians.
Are you trying to move the goalposts, or are you just totally missing the point?
Speaking of conspiracy theories and moving goalposts:
[…] he managed to be detained by police twice during his university years: once for stealing a Christmas wreath as a fraternity prank and once for trying to tear down the goalposts […]
Be sure to include the WHOLE article when you cut/paste and spam it to your friends!
April 28, 2011 at 12:01 PM #690740Guest[quote=jstoesz]You should do some research on the issue.
[link][/quote]The movement draws adherents from people of diverse political beliefs including liberals, conservatives, and libertarians.
Are you trying to move the goalposts, or are you just totally missing the point?
Speaking of conspiracy theories and moving goalposts:
[…] he managed to be detained by police twice during his university years: once for stealing a Christmas wreath as a fraternity prank and once for trying to tear down the goalposts […]
Be sure to include the WHOLE article when you cut/paste and spam it to your friends!
April 28, 2011 at 12:01 PM #690884Guest[quote=jstoesz]You should do some research on the issue.
[link][/quote]The movement draws adherents from people of diverse political beliefs including liberals, conservatives, and libertarians.
Are you trying to move the goalposts, or are you just totally missing the point?
Speaking of conspiracy theories and moving goalposts:
[…] he managed to be detained by police twice during his university years: once for stealing a Christmas wreath as a fraternity prank and once for trying to tear down the goalposts […]
Be sure to include the WHOLE article when you cut/paste and spam it to your friends!
April 28, 2011 at 12:01 PM #691234Guest[quote=jstoesz]You should do some research on the issue.
[link][/quote]The movement draws adherents from people of diverse political beliefs including liberals, conservatives, and libertarians.
Are you trying to move the goalposts, or are you just totally missing the point?
Speaking of conspiracy theories and moving goalposts:
[…] he managed to be detained by police twice during his university years: once for stealing a Christmas wreath as a fraternity prank and once for trying to tear down the goalposts […]
Be sure to include the WHOLE article when you cut/paste and spam it to your friends!
April 28, 2011 at 12:06 PM #690064SK in CV
Participant[quote=jstoesz]
You should do some research on the issue.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_Truth_movement%5B/quote%5D
I have. I’m very familiar with it. From your link:
The movement draws adherents from people of diverse political beliefs including liberals, conservatives, and libertarians. A 2010 study of Facebook users affiliated with a 9/11 Truth group known as “We Are Change” found that most members of this group are males in their late 20s. Most members of this group are involved in right-wing politics, particularly with libertarianism and Ron Paul.
So I’ll just repeat myself. Absurd false equivilence. Epic fail.
April 28, 2011 at 12:06 PM #690133Participant[quote=jstoesz]
You should do some research on the issue.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_Truth_movement%5B/quote%5D
I have. I’m very familiar with it. From your link:
The movement draws adherents from people of diverse political beliefs including liberals, conservatives, and libertarians. A 2010 study of Facebook users affiliated with a 9/11 Truth group known as “We Are Change” found that most members of this group are males in their late 20s. Most members of this group are involved in right-wing politics, particularly with libertarianism and Ron Paul.
So I’ll just repeat myself. Absurd false equivilence. Epic fail.
April 28, 2011 at 12:06 PM #690745Participant[quote=jstoesz]
You should do some research on the issue.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_Truth_movement%5B/quote%5D
I have. I’m very familiar with it. From your link:
The movement draws adherents from people of diverse political beliefs including liberals, conservatives, and libertarians. A 2010 study of Facebook users affiliated with a 9/11 Truth group known as “We Are Change” found that most members of this group are males in their late 20s. Most members of this group are involved in right-wing politics, particularly with libertarianism and Ron Paul.
So I’ll just repeat myself. Absurd false equivilence. Epic fail.
April 28, 2011 at 12:06 PM #690889Participant[quote=jstoesz]
You should do some research on the issue.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_Truth_movement%5B/quote%5D
I have. I’m very familiar with it. From your link:
The movement draws adherents from people of diverse political beliefs including liberals, conservatives, and libertarians. A 2010 study of Facebook users affiliated with a 9/11 Truth group known as “We Are Change” found that most members of this group are males in their late 20s. Most members of this group are involved in right-wing politics, particularly with libertarianism and Ron Paul.
So I’ll just repeat myself. Absurd false equivilence. Epic fail.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.