- This topic has 381 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 10 months ago by
scaredyclassic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 29, 2011 at 11:07 AM #726949August 29, 2011 at 11:12 AM #725748
briansd1
Guest[quote=walterwhite]and that’s visible on HEAVY that different people use and burn at differing rates. but at the end of the day, some people earn more money than others, some burn up a few more calories a day. but at the end of the day, everyone can get out of the obese category if they eat real food and move around. sure some will be heavier than others, even with the same foods.
maybe like financial education, where the rich just get to acquire and spend more, some slower burners will have to be told, look, bad luck, but you don’t get to eat as much as your faster burner colleagues.
it’s not unrealisticto get 4 hours of exercise to save your lfie. hell, it’s pretty easy to get 4 hours of tv/internet usage. 4 hourscould include brisk housework, a little gardening, a bike ride to the store,a jog…4 hours of movement…[/quote]
That’s pretty much it, walter.
Some need more calaries than others. Who said we all get to eat the same?
Some need more money than others.
Some are perfectly happy living on little. I have a relative like that. She only wants to stay home and garden. She’s happiest when people come visit her. And her money? She gives it away to the relatives who are youngest, poorest and need it most.
August 29, 2011 at 11:12 AM #725835Guest[quote=walterwhite]and that’s visible on HEAVY that different people use and burn at differing rates. but at the end of the day, some people earn more money than others, some burn up a few more calories a day. but at the end of the day, everyone can get out of the obese category if they eat real food and move around. sure some will be heavier than others, even with the same foods.
maybe like financial education, where the rich just get to acquire and spend more, some slower burners will have to be told, look, bad luck, but you don’t get to eat as much as your faster burner colleagues.
it’s not unrealisticto get 4 hours of exercise to save your lfie. hell, it’s pretty easy to get 4 hours of tv/internet usage. 4 hourscould include brisk housework, a little gardening, a bike ride to the store,a jog…4 hours of movement…[/quote]
That’s pretty much it, walter.
Some need more calaries than others. Who said we all get to eat the same?
Some need more money than others.
Some are perfectly happy living on little. I have a relative like that. She only wants to stay home and garden. She’s happiest when people come visit her. And her money? She gives it away to the relatives who are youngest, poorest and need it most.
August 29, 2011 at 11:12 AM #726434Guest[quote=walterwhite]and that’s visible on HEAVY that different people use and burn at differing rates. but at the end of the day, some people earn more money than others, some burn up a few more calories a day. but at the end of the day, everyone can get out of the obese category if they eat real food and move around. sure some will be heavier than others, even with the same foods.
maybe like financial education, where the rich just get to acquire and spend more, some slower burners will have to be told, look, bad luck, but you don’t get to eat as much as your faster burner colleagues.
it’s not unrealisticto get 4 hours of exercise to save your lfie. hell, it’s pretty easy to get 4 hours of tv/internet usage. 4 hourscould include brisk housework, a little gardening, a bike ride to the store,a jog…4 hours of movement…[/quote]
That’s pretty much it, walter.
Some need more calaries than others. Who said we all get to eat the same?
Some need more money than others.
Some are perfectly happy living on little. I have a relative like that. She only wants to stay home and garden. She’s happiest when people come visit her. And her money? She gives it away to the relatives who are youngest, poorest and need it most.
August 29, 2011 at 11:12 AM #726591Guest[quote=walterwhite]and that’s visible on HEAVY that different people use and burn at differing rates. but at the end of the day, some people earn more money than others, some burn up a few more calories a day. but at the end of the day, everyone can get out of the obese category if they eat real food and move around. sure some will be heavier than others, even with the same foods.
maybe like financial education, where the rich just get to acquire and spend more, some slower burners will have to be told, look, bad luck, but you don’t get to eat as much as your faster burner colleagues.
it’s not unrealisticto get 4 hours of exercise to save your lfie. hell, it’s pretty easy to get 4 hours of tv/internet usage. 4 hourscould include brisk housework, a little gardening, a bike ride to the store,a jog…4 hours of movement…[/quote]
That’s pretty much it, walter.
Some need more calaries than others. Who said we all get to eat the same?
Some need more money than others.
Some are perfectly happy living on little. I have a relative like that. She only wants to stay home and garden. She’s happiest when people come visit her. And her money? She gives it away to the relatives who are youngest, poorest and need it most.
August 29, 2011 at 11:12 AM #726959Guest[quote=walterwhite]and that’s visible on HEAVY that different people use and burn at differing rates. but at the end of the day, some people earn more money than others, some burn up a few more calories a day. but at the end of the day, everyone can get out of the obese category if they eat real food and move around. sure some will be heavier than others, even with the same foods.
maybe like financial education, where the rich just get to acquire and spend more, some slower burners will have to be told, look, bad luck, but you don’t get to eat as much as your faster burner colleagues.
it’s not unrealisticto get 4 hours of exercise to save your lfie. hell, it’s pretty easy to get 4 hours of tv/internet usage. 4 hourscould include brisk housework, a little gardening, a bike ride to the store,a jog…4 hours of movement…[/quote]
That’s pretty much it, walter.
Some need more calaries than others. Who said we all get to eat the same?
Some need more money than others.
Some are perfectly happy living on little. I have a relative like that. She only wants to stay home and garden. She’s happiest when people come visit her. And her money? She gives it away to the relatives who are youngest, poorest and need it most.
August 29, 2011 at 11:29 AM #725753Guest[quote=Navydoc] The concept is called fetal programming,
.[/quote]Moms do affect their children’s eating habits.
Research shows mothers’ eating habits influence babies in the womb.
[quote=Navydoc]
In regions of the world where calorie restriction is the norm the thrifty phenotype individual looks normal, but in our high sugar/high fat environment this type of metabolism can be a disaster.[/quote]
That could explain why people in poor countries become fat and obese with sudden caloric wealth within a generation (Philippines, Iran, India, China, Mexico, etc..)
[quote=Navydoc]
In the US today it is theorized that poor prenatal care (I’m not insinuating anything about your pregnancies-please don’t be offended) relates to poor fetal nutrition and growth, which is reversed once the babies are born. Very often a pregnancy in an otherwise healthy woman has an abnormal placenta, either through a separation, or leading to preeclampsia, in which case the placenta is unable to meet the nutritional needs of the fetus, leading to the same problem.
[/quote]I wonder why such high cases of thrifty phenotypes in America. It’s definitely not calorie restriction that’s causing it.
Something in the environment or the food is causing abnormal placenta.
August 29, 2011 at 11:29 AM #725840Guest[quote=Navydoc] The concept is called fetal programming,
.[/quote]Moms do affect their children’s eating habits.
Research shows mothers’ eating habits influence babies in the womb.
[quote=Navydoc]
In regions of the world where calorie restriction is the norm the thrifty phenotype individual looks normal, but in our high sugar/high fat environment this type of metabolism can be a disaster.[/quote]
That could explain why people in poor countries become fat and obese with sudden caloric wealth within a generation (Philippines, Iran, India, China, Mexico, etc..)
[quote=Navydoc]
In the US today it is theorized that poor prenatal care (I’m not insinuating anything about your pregnancies-please don’t be offended) relates to poor fetal nutrition and growth, which is reversed once the babies are born. Very often a pregnancy in an otherwise healthy woman has an abnormal placenta, either through a separation, or leading to preeclampsia, in which case the placenta is unable to meet the nutritional needs of the fetus, leading to the same problem.
[/quote]I wonder why such high cases of thrifty phenotypes in America. It’s definitely not calorie restriction that’s causing it.
Something in the environment or the food is causing abnormal placenta.
August 29, 2011 at 11:29 AM #726439Guest[quote=Navydoc] The concept is called fetal programming,
.[/quote]Moms do affect their children’s eating habits.
Research shows mothers’ eating habits influence babies in the womb.
[quote=Navydoc]
In regions of the world where calorie restriction is the norm the thrifty phenotype individual looks normal, but in our high sugar/high fat environment this type of metabolism can be a disaster.[/quote]
That could explain why people in poor countries become fat and obese with sudden caloric wealth within a generation (Philippines, Iran, India, China, Mexico, etc..)
[quote=Navydoc]
In the US today it is theorized that poor prenatal care (I’m not insinuating anything about your pregnancies-please don’t be offended) relates to poor fetal nutrition and growth, which is reversed once the babies are born. Very often a pregnancy in an otherwise healthy woman has an abnormal placenta, either through a separation, or leading to preeclampsia, in which case the placenta is unable to meet the nutritional needs of the fetus, leading to the same problem.
[/quote]I wonder why such high cases of thrifty phenotypes in America. It’s definitely not calorie restriction that’s causing it.
Something in the environment or the food is causing abnormal placenta.
August 29, 2011 at 11:29 AM #726596Guest[quote=Navydoc] The concept is called fetal programming,
.[/quote]Moms do affect their children’s eating habits.
Research shows mothers’ eating habits influence babies in the womb.
[quote=Navydoc]
In regions of the world where calorie restriction is the norm the thrifty phenotype individual looks normal, but in our high sugar/high fat environment this type of metabolism can be a disaster.[/quote]
That could explain why people in poor countries become fat and obese with sudden caloric wealth within a generation (Philippines, Iran, India, China, Mexico, etc..)
[quote=Navydoc]
In the US today it is theorized that poor prenatal care (I’m not insinuating anything about your pregnancies-please don’t be offended) relates to poor fetal nutrition and growth, which is reversed once the babies are born. Very often a pregnancy in an otherwise healthy woman has an abnormal placenta, either through a separation, or leading to preeclampsia, in which case the placenta is unable to meet the nutritional needs of the fetus, leading to the same problem.
[/quote]I wonder why such high cases of thrifty phenotypes in America. It’s definitely not calorie restriction that’s causing it.
Something in the environment or the food is causing abnormal placenta.
August 29, 2011 at 11:29 AM #726964Guest[quote=Navydoc] The concept is called fetal programming,
.[/quote]Moms do affect their children’s eating habits.
Research shows mothers’ eating habits influence babies in the womb.
[quote=Navydoc]
In regions of the world where calorie restriction is the norm the thrifty phenotype individual looks normal, but in our high sugar/high fat environment this type of metabolism can be a disaster.[/quote]
That could explain why people in poor countries become fat and obese with sudden caloric wealth within a generation (Philippines, Iran, India, China, Mexico, etc..)
[quote=Navydoc]
In the US today it is theorized that poor prenatal care (I’m not insinuating anything about your pregnancies-please don’t be offended) relates to poor fetal nutrition and growth, which is reversed once the babies are born. Very often a pregnancy in an otherwise healthy woman has an abnormal placenta, either through a separation, or leading to preeclampsia, in which case the placenta is unable to meet the nutritional needs of the fetus, leading to the same problem.
[/quote]I wonder why such high cases of thrifty phenotypes in America. It’s definitely not calorie restriction that’s causing it.
Something in the environment or the food is causing abnormal placenta.
August 29, 2011 at 12:03 PM #725763Allan from Fallbrook
Participant[quote=briansd1][quote=aldante][quote=Allan from Fallbrook][quote=briansd1]What do you guys think of Bill Clinton going vegan?
I think that it’s smart of him. It will stop heart disease and allow him to live a long time.[/quote]
Brian: I do hope Slick Willie lives a long time. Hillary is going to need his wise counsel when she mounts a primary challenge in 2012.
Kidding aside, he looks healthier. Do you think Monica Lewinsky gave up meat, too?[/quote]
Allan,
I am howling right now…..thanks![/quote]haahaha, Allan…[/quote]
Brian: Ah, c’mon, I kid Clinton, I kid. Didn’t you mention the value of the occasional snide remark?
Aldante: You’re more than welcome. I’m still puzzled by Bill’s choice of Monica, but, hey, maybe the gal had some skills, if’n you know what I’m sayin’?
August 29, 2011 at 12:03 PM #725850Participant[quote=briansd1][quote=aldante][quote=Allan from Fallbrook][quote=briansd1]What do you guys think of Bill Clinton going vegan?
I think that it’s smart of him. It will stop heart disease and allow him to live a long time.[/quote]
Brian: I do hope Slick Willie lives a long time. Hillary is going to need his wise counsel when she mounts a primary challenge in 2012.
Kidding aside, he looks healthier. Do you think Monica Lewinsky gave up meat, too?[/quote]
Allan,
I am howling right now…..thanks![/quote]haahaha, Allan…[/quote]
Brian: Ah, c’mon, I kid Clinton, I kid. Didn’t you mention the value of the occasional snide remark?
Aldante: You’re more than welcome. I’m still puzzled by Bill’s choice of Monica, but, hey, maybe the gal had some skills, if’n you know what I’m sayin’?
August 29, 2011 at 12:03 PM #726449Participant[quote=briansd1][quote=aldante][quote=Allan from Fallbrook][quote=briansd1]What do you guys think of Bill Clinton going vegan?
I think that it’s smart of him. It will stop heart disease and allow him to live a long time.[/quote]
Brian: I do hope Slick Willie lives a long time. Hillary is going to need his wise counsel when she mounts a primary challenge in 2012.
Kidding aside, he looks healthier. Do you think Monica Lewinsky gave up meat, too?[/quote]
Allan,
I am howling right now…..thanks![/quote]haahaha, Allan…[/quote]
Brian: Ah, c’mon, I kid Clinton, I kid. Didn’t you mention the value of the occasional snide remark?
Aldante: You’re more than welcome. I’m still puzzled by Bill’s choice of Monica, but, hey, maybe the gal had some skills, if’n you know what I’m sayin’?
August 29, 2011 at 12:03 PM #726606Participant[quote=briansd1][quote=aldante][quote=Allan from Fallbrook][quote=briansd1]What do you guys think of Bill Clinton going vegan?
I think that it’s smart of him. It will stop heart disease and allow him to live a long time.[/quote]
Brian: I do hope Slick Willie lives a long time. Hillary is going to need his wise counsel when she mounts a primary challenge in 2012.
Kidding aside, he looks healthier. Do you think Monica Lewinsky gave up meat, too?[/quote]
Allan,
I am howling right now…..thanks![/quote]haahaha, Allan…[/quote]
Brian: Ah, c’mon, I kid Clinton, I kid. Didn’t you mention the value of the occasional snide remark?
Aldante: You’re more than welcome. I’m still puzzled by Bill’s choice of Monica, but, hey, maybe the gal had some skills, if’n you know what I’m sayin’?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.