- This topic has 225 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 2 months ago by gandalf.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 29, 2008 at 5:23 PM #263577August 29, 2008 at 6:30 PM #263280TuVuParticipant
[quote=Aecetia]A female President… sounds good to me.[/quote]
Aecetia–It’s not gonna work. How many female middle-aged former Hillary supporters like me would cross the line to vote for the antithesis of Hillary? Sarah is anti-abortion, anti-gay, and a creationist. I am pissed that the McCain people are insulting us. Many of us on this board have probably seen my sentiments expressed by other women on other boards today? Even my very elderly father, a strict Goldwater Repub, was horrified by the news this morning. He’s going to write in someone else (I don’t know who).
Kind regards because of our genial PMs of the past.
August 29, 2008 at 6:30 PM #263488TuVuParticipant[quote=Aecetia]A female President… sounds good to me.[/quote]
Aecetia–It’s not gonna work. How many female middle-aged former Hillary supporters like me would cross the line to vote for the antithesis of Hillary? Sarah is anti-abortion, anti-gay, and a creationist. I am pissed that the McCain people are insulting us. Many of us on this board have probably seen my sentiments expressed by other women on other boards today? Even my very elderly father, a strict Goldwater Repub, was horrified by the news this morning. He’s going to write in someone else (I don’t know who).
Kind regards because of our genial PMs of the past.
August 29, 2008 at 6:30 PM #263492TuVuParticipant[quote=Aecetia]A female President… sounds good to me.[/quote]
Aecetia–It’s not gonna work. How many female middle-aged former Hillary supporters like me would cross the line to vote for the antithesis of Hillary? Sarah is anti-abortion, anti-gay, and a creationist. I am pissed that the McCain people are insulting us. Many of us on this board have probably seen my sentiments expressed by other women on other boards today? Even my very elderly father, a strict Goldwater Repub, was horrified by the news this morning. He’s going to write in someone else (I don’t know who).
Kind regards because of our genial PMs of the past.
August 29, 2008 at 6:30 PM #263546TuVuParticipant[quote=Aecetia]A female President… sounds good to me.[/quote]
Aecetia–It’s not gonna work. How many female middle-aged former Hillary supporters like me would cross the line to vote for the antithesis of Hillary? Sarah is anti-abortion, anti-gay, and a creationist. I am pissed that the McCain people are insulting us. Many of us on this board have probably seen my sentiments expressed by other women on other boards today? Even my very elderly father, a strict Goldwater Repub, was horrified by the news this morning. He’s going to write in someone else (I don’t know who).
Kind regards because of our genial PMs of the past.
August 29, 2008 at 6:30 PM #263582TuVuParticipant[quote=Aecetia]A female President… sounds good to me.[/quote]
Aecetia–It’s not gonna work. How many female middle-aged former Hillary supporters like me would cross the line to vote for the antithesis of Hillary? Sarah is anti-abortion, anti-gay, and a creationist. I am pissed that the McCain people are insulting us. Many of us on this board have probably seen my sentiments expressed by other women on other boards today? Even my very elderly father, a strict Goldwater Repub, was horrified by the news this morning. He’s going to write in someone else (I don’t know who).
Kind regards because of our genial PMs of the past.
August 29, 2008 at 6:46 PM #263285AnonymousGuestTuVu –
Couldn’t agree more. If they did this to motivate the Christian conservatives out of their houses come November, I’ll buy it. If they truly thought they were going to get female Hillary supporters just by putting a woman on the ticket, they are even more stupid than I thought. And truly insulting to women – that they will vote for a woman just because she is a woman. As if women don’t know anything about issues and the candidates positions on them.
August 29, 2008 at 6:46 PM #263493AnonymousGuestTuVu –
Couldn’t agree more. If they did this to motivate the Christian conservatives out of their houses come November, I’ll buy it. If they truly thought they were going to get female Hillary supporters just by putting a woman on the ticket, they are even more stupid than I thought. And truly insulting to women – that they will vote for a woman just because she is a woman. As if women don’t know anything about issues and the candidates positions on them.
August 29, 2008 at 6:46 PM #263497AnonymousGuestTuVu –
Couldn’t agree more. If they did this to motivate the Christian conservatives out of their houses come November, I’ll buy it. If they truly thought they were going to get female Hillary supporters just by putting a woman on the ticket, they are even more stupid than I thought. And truly insulting to women – that they will vote for a woman just because she is a woman. As if women don’t know anything about issues and the candidates positions on them.
August 29, 2008 at 6:46 PM #263551AnonymousGuestTuVu –
Couldn’t agree more. If they did this to motivate the Christian conservatives out of their houses come November, I’ll buy it. If they truly thought they were going to get female Hillary supporters just by putting a woman on the ticket, they are even more stupid than I thought. And truly insulting to women – that they will vote for a woman just because she is a woman. As if women don’t know anything about issues and the candidates positions on them.
August 29, 2008 at 6:46 PM #263587AnonymousGuestTuVu –
Couldn’t agree more. If they did this to motivate the Christian conservatives out of their houses come November, I’ll buy it. If they truly thought they were going to get female Hillary supporters just by putting a woman on the ticket, they are even more stupid than I thought. And truly insulting to women – that they will vote for a woman just because she is a woman. As if women don’t know anything about issues and the candidates positions on them.
August 29, 2008 at 8:06 PM #263305VeritasParticipantBetter than Lieberman.
August 29, 2008 at 8:06 PM #263514VeritasParticipantBetter than Lieberman.
August 29, 2008 at 8:06 PM #263517VeritasParticipantBetter than Lieberman.
August 29, 2008 at 8:06 PM #263571VeritasParticipantBetter than Lieberman.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.