- This topic has 225 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by gandalf.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 1, 2008 at 11:15 AM #264859September 1, 2008 at 11:16 AM #264559NotCrankyParticipant
In honor of true conservative values she will not be applying for social benefits and the family says that this should be the norm. Even for girls who come from broken and destitute families who similiarly value getting pregnant at 17. It is all about “choice” after all.
September 1, 2008 at 11:16 AM #264768NotCrankyParticipantIn honor of true conservative values she will not be applying for social benefits and the family says that this should be the norm. Even for girls who come from broken and destitute families who similiarly value getting pregnant at 17. It is all about “choice” after all.
September 1, 2008 at 11:16 AM #264772NotCrankyParticipantIn honor of true conservative values she will not be applying for social benefits and the family says that this should be the norm. Even for girls who come from broken and destitute families who similiarly value getting pregnant at 17. It is all about “choice” after all.
September 1, 2008 at 11:16 AM #264827NotCrankyParticipantIn honor of true conservative values she will not be applying for social benefits and the family says that this should be the norm. Even for girls who come from broken and destitute families who similiarly value getting pregnant at 17. It is all about “choice” after all.
September 1, 2008 at 11:16 AM #264864NotCrankyParticipantIn honor of true conservative values she will not be applying for social benefits and the family says that this should be the norm. Even for girls who come from broken and destitute families who similiarly value getting pregnant at 17. It is all about “choice” after all.
September 1, 2008 at 11:34 AM #264563EugeneParticipantThat’s what happens when you have abstinence-only education – shotgun weddings and pregnant teens.
No, that’s what happens when you have four kids, you’re pregnant with the fifth, and you’re trying to do a decent job as a governor of a big state.
she will not be applying for social benefits and the family says that this should be the norm.
Hold on, what benefits? Her income as a governor should disqualify her household from getting any social benefits by a large margin.
September 1, 2008 at 11:34 AM #264773EugeneParticipantThat’s what happens when you have abstinence-only education – shotgun weddings and pregnant teens.
No, that’s what happens when you have four kids, you’re pregnant with the fifth, and you’re trying to do a decent job as a governor of a big state.
she will not be applying for social benefits and the family says that this should be the norm.
Hold on, what benefits? Her income as a governor should disqualify her household from getting any social benefits by a large margin.
September 1, 2008 at 11:34 AM #264777EugeneParticipantThat’s what happens when you have abstinence-only education – shotgun weddings and pregnant teens.
No, that’s what happens when you have four kids, you’re pregnant with the fifth, and you’re trying to do a decent job as a governor of a big state.
she will not be applying for social benefits and the family says that this should be the norm.
Hold on, what benefits? Her income as a governor should disqualify her household from getting any social benefits by a large margin.
September 1, 2008 at 11:34 AM #264832EugeneParticipantThat’s what happens when you have abstinence-only education – shotgun weddings and pregnant teens.
No, that’s what happens when you have four kids, you’re pregnant with the fifth, and you’re trying to do a decent job as a governor of a big state.
she will not be applying for social benefits and the family says that this should be the norm.
Hold on, what benefits? Her income as a governor should disqualify her household from getting any social benefits by a large margin.
September 1, 2008 at 11:34 AM #264869EugeneParticipantThat’s what happens when you have abstinence-only education – shotgun weddings and pregnant teens.
No, that’s what happens when you have four kids, you’re pregnant with the fifth, and you’re trying to do a decent job as a governor of a big state.
she will not be applying for social benefits and the family says that this should be the norm.
Hold on, what benefits? Her income as a governor should disqualify her household from getting any social benefits by a large margin.
September 1, 2008 at 11:37 AM #264578afx114Participant[quote=esmith]No, that’s what happens when you have four kids, you’re pregnant with the fifth, and you’re trying to do a decent job as a governor of a big state.[/quote]
Makes you wonder how she’ll perform when she has 5 kids, 1 grandkid, is President of the United States, and Putin is breathing down her neck.
September 1, 2008 at 11:37 AM #264788afx114Participant[quote=esmith]No, that’s what happens when you have four kids, you’re pregnant with the fifth, and you’re trying to do a decent job as a governor of a big state.[/quote]
Makes you wonder how she’ll perform when she has 5 kids, 1 grandkid, is President of the United States, and Putin is breathing down her neck.
September 1, 2008 at 11:37 AM #264791afx114Participant[quote=esmith]No, that’s what happens when you have four kids, you’re pregnant with the fifth, and you’re trying to do a decent job as a governor of a big state.[/quote]
Makes you wonder how she’ll perform when she has 5 kids, 1 grandkid, is President of the United States, and Putin is breathing down her neck.
September 1, 2008 at 11:37 AM #264847afx114Participant[quote=esmith]No, that’s what happens when you have four kids, you’re pregnant with the fifth, and you’re trying to do a decent job as a governor of a big state.[/quote]
Makes you wonder how she’ll perform when she has 5 kids, 1 grandkid, is President of the United States, and Putin is breathing down her neck.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.