- This topic has 195 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 7 months ago by
Sly.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 13, 2008 at 11:59 AM #186114April 13, 2008 at 12:29 PM #186062
svelteParticipantThere seems to be more timeless male names that female.
If you *really* want to see what names have staying power, this is a good site:
http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/babynames/
Scroll down to the bottom..you can look at any year back to 1879. Even going back 50 years, if the name has been highly ranked all those years it stands a good chance of remaining highly ranked.
We went back and forth on whether a common name or an unusual name was better. We ended up with one kid with a common name and one with an unusual one.
Now, 20 yrs down the road, I think the unusual name is better (as long as it doesn’t sound dated). It tends to stick in people’s minds easier, and helps the person stand out from the crowd.
April 13, 2008 at 12:29 PM #186081
svelteParticipantThere seems to be more timeless male names that female.
If you *really* want to see what names have staying power, this is a good site:
http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/babynames/
Scroll down to the bottom..you can look at any year back to 1879. Even going back 50 years, if the name has been highly ranked all those years it stands a good chance of remaining highly ranked.
We went back and forth on whether a common name or an unusual name was better. We ended up with one kid with a common name and one with an unusual one.
Now, 20 yrs down the road, I think the unusual name is better (as long as it doesn’t sound dated). It tends to stick in people’s minds easier, and helps the person stand out from the crowd.
April 13, 2008 at 12:29 PM #186112
svelteParticipantThere seems to be more timeless male names that female.
If you *really* want to see what names have staying power, this is a good site:
http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/babynames/
Scroll down to the bottom..you can look at any year back to 1879. Even going back 50 years, if the name has been highly ranked all those years it stands a good chance of remaining highly ranked.
We went back and forth on whether a common name or an unusual name was better. We ended up with one kid with a common name and one with an unusual one.
Now, 20 yrs down the road, I think the unusual name is better (as long as it doesn’t sound dated). It tends to stick in people’s minds easier, and helps the person stand out from the crowd.
April 13, 2008 at 12:29 PM #186115
svelteParticipantThere seems to be more timeless male names that female.
If you *really* want to see what names have staying power, this is a good site:
http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/babynames/
Scroll down to the bottom..you can look at any year back to 1879. Even going back 50 years, if the name has been highly ranked all those years it stands a good chance of remaining highly ranked.
We went back and forth on whether a common name or an unusual name was better. We ended up with one kid with a common name and one with an unusual one.
Now, 20 yrs down the road, I think the unusual name is better (as long as it doesn’t sound dated). It tends to stick in people’s minds easier, and helps the person stand out from the crowd.
April 13, 2008 at 12:29 PM #186119
svelteParticipantThere seems to be more timeless male names that female.
If you *really* want to see what names have staying power, this is a good site:
http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/babynames/
Scroll down to the bottom..you can look at any year back to 1879. Even going back 50 years, if the name has been highly ranked all those years it stands a good chance of remaining highly ranked.
We went back and forth on whether a common name or an unusual name was better. We ended up with one kid with a common name and one with an unusual one.
Now, 20 yrs down the road, I think the unusual name is better (as long as it doesn’t sound dated). It tends to stick in people’s minds easier, and helps the person stand out from the crowd.
April 13, 2008 at 12:41 PM #186065tc
ParticipantZOE
Simple and Beautiful.April 13, 2008 at 12:41 PM #186087tc
ParticipantZOE
Simple and Beautiful.April 13, 2008 at 12:41 PM #186117tc
ParticipantZOE
Simple and Beautiful.April 13, 2008 at 12:41 PM #186120tc
ParticipantZOE
Simple and Beautiful.April 13, 2008 at 12:41 PM #186124tc
ParticipantZOE
Simple and Beautiful.April 13, 2008 at 12:43 PM #186077CMcG
ParticipantThanks, svelte, for the link. I scrolled back to my own birth year and found “Mary” was the most popular name. My daughter is about to turn 20 and she has never known anyone her age with that name. We are Irish in ethnicity and there are plenty of “Mary” ancestors. I think that might have been a Catholic “requirement.” Astonishing that “Michael” has held up all these years.
April 13, 2008 at 12:43 PM #186097CMcG
ParticipantThanks, svelte, for the link. I scrolled back to my own birth year and found “Mary” was the most popular name. My daughter is about to turn 20 and she has never known anyone her age with that name. We are Irish in ethnicity and there are plenty of “Mary” ancestors. I think that might have been a Catholic “requirement.” Astonishing that “Michael” has held up all these years.
April 13, 2008 at 12:43 PM #186127CMcG
ParticipantThanks, svelte, for the link. I scrolled back to my own birth year and found “Mary” was the most popular name. My daughter is about to turn 20 and she has never known anyone her age with that name. We are Irish in ethnicity and there are plenty of “Mary” ancestors. I think that might have been a Catholic “requirement.” Astonishing that “Michael” has held up all these years.
April 13, 2008 at 12:43 PM #186130CMcG
ParticipantThanks, svelte, for the link. I scrolled back to my own birth year and found “Mary” was the most popular name. My daughter is about to turn 20 and she has never known anyone her age with that name. We are Irish in ethnicity and there are plenty of “Mary” ancestors. I think that might have been a Catholic “requirement.” Astonishing that “Michael” has held up all these years.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
