- This topic has 625 replies, 38 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 11 months ago by DataAgent.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 9, 2010 at 5:36 PM #589411August 17, 2010 at 7:55 PM #592320briansd1Guest
Invasion of the Country Snatchers
Same-sex marriage is legal in Mexico and Canada, which makes America the straight meat in a big gay sandwich. (03:04)August 17, 2010 at 7:55 PM #592417briansd1GuestInvasion of the Country Snatchers
Same-sex marriage is legal in Mexico and Canada, which makes America the straight meat in a big gay sandwich. (03:04)August 17, 2010 at 7:55 PM #592952briansd1GuestInvasion of the Country Snatchers
Same-sex marriage is legal in Mexico and Canada, which makes America the straight meat in a big gay sandwich. (03:04)August 17, 2010 at 7:55 PM #593064briansd1GuestInvasion of the Country Snatchers
Same-sex marriage is legal in Mexico and Canada, which makes America the straight meat in a big gay sandwich. (03:04)August 17, 2010 at 7:55 PM #593372briansd1GuestInvasion of the Country Snatchers
Same-sex marriage is legal in Mexico and Canada, which makes America the straight meat in a big gay sandwich. (03:04)August 18, 2010 at 12:00 PM #592576ucodegenParticipant[quote davelj]
Sounds like there are also some tax issues. Seems like a better idea might be just to “federalize” the civil union (that is, remove it as a state issue) and give it the same benefits that married couples have. I see no reason why a civil union shouldn’t hold the same rights as a marriage.
[/quote]This is definitely something I would agree on. The concept of getting a ‘license’ from the state to marry, is mixing a religious concept with the state (there is supposed to be a separation of church and state). Civil union is a legal term while marriage is religious(that has legal connotations)..
Besides, if homosexuals want a ‘marriage’.. they could then create their own church.. ie. Church of the Latter-day Gays.. whatever floats their boat. This way they are also free of the ‘mainstream’ church’s condemnation of homosexuality.
[quote flu]
The only issue with that is then pretty soon you’ll get folks challenging whether civil union must be with another person…. π (….No really, I bond more with my PC than my spouse…..) :..
[/quote]
Or the PETA group might push it… civil rights for animals and then civil unions? (Ick, the mental imagery)[quote flu]
Not necessarily.. I’ve learned that some of the most beautiful women are also the ones not interested in men, and if you go to some places like in Thailand, some of the beautiful “women” aren’t women at all π
[/quote]
That reminds me of a picture my sister took when she visited a ladyboy(Kathoey) contest out of curiosity. One of them really looked like a female…(wanna walk on the wild side?). Some of the ladyboys get breast implants to further their looks.. though not always the sex change.[quote briansd1]
Invasion of the Country Snatchers
Same-sex marriage is legal in Mexico and Canada, which makes America the straight meat in a big gay sandwich. (03:04)
[/quote]
I don’t know if you meant to word it that way or not.. ;-P..I’ve been working long hours (50% OT).. I think I am getting slap-happy already.
August 18, 2010 at 12:00 PM #592673ucodegenParticipant[quote davelj]
Sounds like there are also some tax issues. Seems like a better idea might be just to “federalize” the civil union (that is, remove it as a state issue) and give it the same benefits that married couples have. I see no reason why a civil union shouldn’t hold the same rights as a marriage.
[/quote]This is definitely something I would agree on. The concept of getting a ‘license’ from the state to marry, is mixing a religious concept with the state (there is supposed to be a separation of church and state). Civil union is a legal term while marriage is religious(that has legal connotations)..
Besides, if homosexuals want a ‘marriage’.. they could then create their own church.. ie. Church of the Latter-day Gays.. whatever floats their boat. This way they are also free of the ‘mainstream’ church’s condemnation of homosexuality.
[quote flu]
The only issue with that is then pretty soon you’ll get folks challenging whether civil union must be with another person…. π (….No really, I bond more with my PC than my spouse…..) :..
[/quote]
Or the PETA group might push it… civil rights for animals and then civil unions? (Ick, the mental imagery)[quote flu]
Not necessarily.. I’ve learned that some of the most beautiful women are also the ones not interested in men, and if you go to some places like in Thailand, some of the beautiful “women” aren’t women at all π
[/quote]
That reminds me of a picture my sister took when she visited a ladyboy(Kathoey) contest out of curiosity. One of them really looked like a female…(wanna walk on the wild side?). Some of the ladyboys get breast implants to further their looks.. though not always the sex change.[quote briansd1]
Invasion of the Country Snatchers
Same-sex marriage is legal in Mexico and Canada, which makes America the straight meat in a big gay sandwich. (03:04)
[/quote]
I don’t know if you meant to word it that way or not.. ;-P..I’ve been working long hours (50% OT).. I think I am getting slap-happy already.
August 18, 2010 at 12:00 PM #593208ucodegenParticipant[quote davelj]
Sounds like there are also some tax issues. Seems like a better idea might be just to “federalize” the civil union (that is, remove it as a state issue) and give it the same benefits that married couples have. I see no reason why a civil union shouldn’t hold the same rights as a marriage.
[/quote]This is definitely something I would agree on. The concept of getting a ‘license’ from the state to marry, is mixing a religious concept with the state (there is supposed to be a separation of church and state). Civil union is a legal term while marriage is religious(that has legal connotations)..
Besides, if homosexuals want a ‘marriage’.. they could then create their own church.. ie. Church of the Latter-day Gays.. whatever floats their boat. This way they are also free of the ‘mainstream’ church’s condemnation of homosexuality.
[quote flu]
The only issue with that is then pretty soon you’ll get folks challenging whether civil union must be with another person…. π (….No really, I bond more with my PC than my spouse…..) :..
[/quote]
Or the PETA group might push it… civil rights for animals and then civil unions? (Ick, the mental imagery)[quote flu]
Not necessarily.. I’ve learned that some of the most beautiful women are also the ones not interested in men, and if you go to some places like in Thailand, some of the beautiful “women” aren’t women at all π
[/quote]
That reminds me of a picture my sister took when she visited a ladyboy(Kathoey) contest out of curiosity. One of them really looked like a female…(wanna walk on the wild side?). Some of the ladyboys get breast implants to further their looks.. though not always the sex change.[quote briansd1]
Invasion of the Country Snatchers
Same-sex marriage is legal in Mexico and Canada, which makes America the straight meat in a big gay sandwich. (03:04)
[/quote]
I don’t know if you meant to word it that way or not.. ;-P..I’ve been working long hours (50% OT).. I think I am getting slap-happy already.
August 18, 2010 at 12:00 PM #593319ucodegenParticipant[quote davelj]
Sounds like there are also some tax issues. Seems like a better idea might be just to “federalize” the civil union (that is, remove it as a state issue) and give it the same benefits that married couples have. I see no reason why a civil union shouldn’t hold the same rights as a marriage.
[/quote]This is definitely something I would agree on. The concept of getting a ‘license’ from the state to marry, is mixing a religious concept with the state (there is supposed to be a separation of church and state). Civil union is a legal term while marriage is religious(that has legal connotations)..
Besides, if homosexuals want a ‘marriage’.. they could then create their own church.. ie. Church of the Latter-day Gays.. whatever floats their boat. This way they are also free of the ‘mainstream’ church’s condemnation of homosexuality.
[quote flu]
The only issue with that is then pretty soon you’ll get folks challenging whether civil union must be with another person…. π (….No really, I bond more with my PC than my spouse…..) :..
[/quote]
Or the PETA group might push it… civil rights for animals and then civil unions? (Ick, the mental imagery)[quote flu]
Not necessarily.. I’ve learned that some of the most beautiful women are also the ones not interested in men, and if you go to some places like in Thailand, some of the beautiful “women” aren’t women at all π
[/quote]
That reminds me of a picture my sister took when she visited a ladyboy(Kathoey) contest out of curiosity. One of them really looked like a female…(wanna walk on the wild side?). Some of the ladyboys get breast implants to further their looks.. though not always the sex change.[quote briansd1]
Invasion of the Country Snatchers
Same-sex marriage is legal in Mexico and Canada, which makes America the straight meat in a big gay sandwich. (03:04)
[/quote]
I don’t know if you meant to word it that way or not.. ;-P..I’ve been working long hours (50% OT).. I think I am getting slap-happy already.
August 18, 2010 at 12:00 PM #593629ucodegenParticipant[quote davelj]
Sounds like there are also some tax issues. Seems like a better idea might be just to “federalize” the civil union (that is, remove it as a state issue) and give it the same benefits that married couples have. I see no reason why a civil union shouldn’t hold the same rights as a marriage.
[/quote]This is definitely something I would agree on. The concept of getting a ‘license’ from the state to marry, is mixing a religious concept with the state (there is supposed to be a separation of church and state). Civil union is a legal term while marriage is religious(that has legal connotations)..
Besides, if homosexuals want a ‘marriage’.. they could then create their own church.. ie. Church of the Latter-day Gays.. whatever floats their boat. This way they are also free of the ‘mainstream’ church’s condemnation of homosexuality.
[quote flu]
The only issue with that is then pretty soon you’ll get folks challenging whether civil union must be with another person…. π (….No really, I bond more with my PC than my spouse…..) :..
[/quote]
Or the PETA group might push it… civil rights for animals and then civil unions? (Ick, the mental imagery)[quote flu]
Not necessarily.. I’ve learned that some of the most beautiful women are also the ones not interested in men, and if you go to some places like in Thailand, some of the beautiful “women” aren’t women at all π
[/quote]
That reminds me of a picture my sister took when she visited a ladyboy(Kathoey) contest out of curiosity. One of them really looked like a female…(wanna walk on the wild side?). Some of the ladyboys get breast implants to further their looks.. though not always the sex change.[quote briansd1]
Invasion of the Country Snatchers
Same-sex marriage is legal in Mexico and Canada, which makes America the straight meat in a big gay sandwich. (03:04)
[/quote]
I don’t know if you meant to word it that way or not.. ;-P..I’ve been working long hours (50% OT).. I think I am getting slap-happy already.
August 26, 2010 at 8:30 PM #596830briansd1GuestI think we already know which side is winning the culture war.
Like I said before, progressive ideas always win the day, sooner or later.
Now he joins several other members of the Bush inner circle who have publicly stated their support for same-sex marriage. Former Vice President Dick Cheney, who has a daughter who is gay, has said he supports the right of gay people to marry, as has the former first lady Laura Bush.
August 26, 2010 at 8:30 PM #596924briansd1GuestI think we already know which side is winning the culture war.
Like I said before, progressive ideas always win the day, sooner or later.
Now he joins several other members of the Bush inner circle who have publicly stated their support for same-sex marriage. Former Vice President Dick Cheney, who has a daughter who is gay, has said he supports the right of gay people to marry, as has the former first lady Laura Bush.
August 26, 2010 at 8:30 PM #597468briansd1GuestI think we already know which side is winning the culture war.
Like I said before, progressive ideas always win the day, sooner or later.
Now he joins several other members of the Bush inner circle who have publicly stated their support for same-sex marriage. Former Vice President Dick Cheney, who has a daughter who is gay, has said he supports the right of gay people to marry, as has the former first lady Laura Bush.
August 26, 2010 at 8:30 PM #597576briansd1GuestI think we already know which side is winning the culture war.
Like I said before, progressive ideas always win the day, sooner or later.
Now he joins several other members of the Bush inner circle who have publicly stated their support for same-sex marriage. Former Vice President Dick Cheney, who has a daughter who is gay, has said he supports the right of gay people to marry, as has the former first lady Laura Bush.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.