- This topic has 825 replies, 27 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 7 months ago by scaredyclassic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 27, 2011 at 7:57 AM #690742April 27, 2011 at 7:59 AM #689572CoronitaParticipant
[quote=UCGal]From the article:
But starting in the 2013-14 school year, it would prohibit districts and the California Board of Education from using textbooks or other instructional materials that reflect adversely on gay, bisexual and transgender Americans.
[/quote]
And here we go again on the gray of what “offensive” would mean.
April 27, 2011 at 7:59 AM #689638CoronitaParticipant[quote=UCGal]From the article:
But starting in the 2013-14 school year, it would prohibit districts and the California Board of Education from using textbooks or other instructional materials that reflect adversely on gay, bisexual and transgender Americans.
[/quote]
And here we go again on the gray of what “offensive” would mean.
April 27, 2011 at 7:59 AM #690251CoronitaParticipant[quote=UCGal]From the article:
But starting in the 2013-14 school year, it would prohibit districts and the California Board of Education from using textbooks or other instructional materials that reflect adversely on gay, bisexual and transgender Americans.
[/quote]
And here we go again on the gray of what “offensive” would mean.
April 27, 2011 at 7:59 AM #690394CoronitaParticipant[quote=UCGal]From the article:
But starting in the 2013-14 school year, it would prohibit districts and the California Board of Education from using textbooks or other instructional materials that reflect adversely on gay, bisexual and transgender Americans.
[/quote]
And here we go again on the gray of what “offensive” would mean.
April 27, 2011 at 7:59 AM #690747CoronitaParticipant[quote=UCGal]From the article:
But starting in the 2013-14 school year, it would prohibit districts and the California Board of Education from using textbooks or other instructional materials that reflect adversely on gay, bisexual and transgender Americans.
[/quote]
And here we go again on the gray of what “offensive” would mean.
April 27, 2011 at 8:12 AM #689577scaredyclassicParticipantAs if more time teaching means better skills.
April 27, 2011 at 8:12 AM #689643scaredyclassicParticipantAs if more time teaching means better skills.
April 27, 2011 at 8:12 AM #690256scaredyclassicParticipantAs if more time teaching means better skills.
April 27, 2011 at 8:12 AM #690399scaredyclassicParticipantAs if more time teaching means better skills.
April 27, 2011 at 8:12 AM #690752scaredyclassicParticipantAs if more time teaching means better skills.
April 27, 2011 at 9:19 AM #689587urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=flu][quote=UCGal]From the article:
But starting in the 2013-14 school year, it would prohibit districts and the California Board of Education from using textbooks or other instructional materials that reflect adversely on gay, bisexual and transgender Americans.
[/quote]
And here we go again on the gray of what “offensive” would mean.[/quote]
Well I went to school in CA and I think that learning things like how the Chinese built the railroads and had to fight for the right to vote (like blacks and women and mexicans and native americans) were hours and tax dollars well spent.
Maybe social studies and recent history is not as important to you.
I am glad you are not teaching our kids.
I agree that gray concepts of offensiveness are stupid but in practice, concepts of appropriate vs inappropriate speech in schools has not really presented too much of a problem.
Nobody finds banning epithets in the classroom particularly controversial.April 27, 2011 at 9:19 AM #689653urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=flu][quote=UCGal]From the article:
But starting in the 2013-14 school year, it would prohibit districts and the California Board of Education from using textbooks or other instructional materials that reflect adversely on gay, bisexual and transgender Americans.
[/quote]
And here we go again on the gray of what “offensive” would mean.[/quote]
Well I went to school in CA and I think that learning things like how the Chinese built the railroads and had to fight for the right to vote (like blacks and women and mexicans and native americans) were hours and tax dollars well spent.
Maybe social studies and recent history is not as important to you.
I am glad you are not teaching our kids.
I agree that gray concepts of offensiveness are stupid but in practice, concepts of appropriate vs inappropriate speech in schools has not really presented too much of a problem.
Nobody finds banning epithets in the classroom particularly controversial.April 27, 2011 at 9:19 AM #690266urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=flu][quote=UCGal]From the article:
But starting in the 2013-14 school year, it would prohibit districts and the California Board of Education from using textbooks or other instructional materials that reflect adversely on gay, bisexual and transgender Americans.
[/quote]
And here we go again on the gray of what “offensive” would mean.[/quote]
Well I went to school in CA and I think that learning things like how the Chinese built the railroads and had to fight for the right to vote (like blacks and women and mexicans and native americans) were hours and tax dollars well spent.
Maybe social studies and recent history is not as important to you.
I am glad you are not teaching our kids.
I agree that gray concepts of offensiveness are stupid but in practice, concepts of appropriate vs inappropriate speech in schools has not really presented too much of a problem.
Nobody finds banning epithets in the classroom particularly controversial.April 27, 2011 at 9:19 AM #690409urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=flu][quote=UCGal]From the article:
But starting in the 2013-14 school year, it would prohibit districts and the California Board of Education from using textbooks or other instructional materials that reflect adversely on gay, bisexual and transgender Americans.
[/quote]
And here we go again on the gray of what “offensive” would mean.[/quote]
Well I went to school in CA and I think that learning things like how the Chinese built the railroads and had to fight for the right to vote (like blacks and women and mexicans and native americans) were hours and tax dollars well spent.
Maybe social studies and recent history is not as important to you.
I am glad you are not teaching our kids.
I agree that gray concepts of offensiveness are stupid but in practice, concepts of appropriate vs inappropriate speech in schools has not really presented too much of a problem.
Nobody finds banning epithets in the classroom particularly controversial. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.