- This topic has 100 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by urbanrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 1, 2008 at 1:50 PM #279254October 1, 2008 at 1:55 PM #278938LAAFTERHOURSParticipant
She has a side hobby which she calls a job but it brings no income. As I understand the alimony law, she will be required to go back to work.
October 1, 2008 at 1:55 PM #279206LAAFTERHOURSParticipantShe has a side hobby which she calls a job but it brings no income. As I understand the alimony law, she will be required to go back to work.
October 1, 2008 at 1:55 PM #279216LAAFTERHOURSParticipantShe has a side hobby which she calls a job but it brings no income. As I understand the alimony law, she will be required to go back to work.
October 1, 2008 at 1:55 PM #279253LAAFTERHOURSParticipantShe has a side hobby which she calls a job but it brings no income. As I understand the alimony law, she will be required to go back to work.
October 1, 2008 at 1:55 PM #279264LAAFTERHOURSParticipantShe has a side hobby which she calls a job but it brings no income. As I understand the alimony law, she will be required to go back to work.
October 1, 2008 at 1:59 PM #278943LAAFTERHOURSParticipant[quote=temeculaguy] It is doubtful either can swing the place with a 50% cut in pay. California does not recognize individual income, the family income is what it is and it gets divided based on a number of factors. [/quote]
Can you elaborate on what those factors are??
October 1, 2008 at 1:59 PM #279211LAAFTERHOURSParticipant[quote=temeculaguy] It is doubtful either can swing the place with a 50% cut in pay. California does not recognize individual income, the family income is what it is and it gets divided based on a number of factors. [/quote]
Can you elaborate on what those factors are??
October 1, 2008 at 1:59 PM #279221LAAFTERHOURSParticipant[quote=temeculaguy] It is doubtful either can swing the place with a 50% cut in pay. California does not recognize individual income, the family income is what it is and it gets divided based on a number of factors. [/quote]
Can you elaborate on what those factors are??
October 1, 2008 at 1:59 PM #279258LAAFTERHOURSParticipant[quote=temeculaguy] It is doubtful either can swing the place with a 50% cut in pay. California does not recognize individual income, the family income is what it is and it gets divided based on a number of factors. [/quote]
Can you elaborate on what those factors are??
October 1, 2008 at 1:59 PM #279269LAAFTERHOURSParticipant[quote=temeculaguy] It is doubtful either can swing the place with a 50% cut in pay. California does not recognize individual income, the family income is what it is and it gets divided based on a number of factors. [/quote]
Can you elaborate on what those factors are??
October 1, 2008 at 2:19 PM #278948patientlywaitingParticipantWomen always complain about their kids and family life especially if it’s not a happy situation.
Women always want something such as more money, help picking up the kids, help watching the kids, help cleaning, etc…, even if they already agreed to taking custody and even after the divorce.
I know it’s sexist to say so, but women always find little things to manipulate. Something always comes up that requires “modifications”.
It’s better to give her her share and get her out of his hair. Be fair to her financially but require that she goes back to work immediately.
If she can’t handle custody of the kids (which she will most likely demand) then take care of them himself, pay her alimony and say goodbye. But don’t let her nag and manipulate. Set up the responsibilities clearly and hold her to the agreement. He should make sure that he lives up to his end of bargain also, so not to give her any opportunity to complain.
Lay down the law and don’t deviate.
TG must be nuts to suggest that the dad continue to live in the same household with the mom until the kids grow up. That would be torture!
BTW, I’m not a bitter husband but I’ve seen too many divorces and I know how they usually go.
October 1, 2008 at 2:19 PM #279215patientlywaitingParticipantWomen always complain about their kids and family life especially if it’s not a happy situation.
Women always want something such as more money, help picking up the kids, help watching the kids, help cleaning, etc…, even if they already agreed to taking custody and even after the divorce.
I know it’s sexist to say so, but women always find little things to manipulate. Something always comes up that requires “modifications”.
It’s better to give her her share and get her out of his hair. Be fair to her financially but require that she goes back to work immediately.
If she can’t handle custody of the kids (which she will most likely demand) then take care of them himself, pay her alimony and say goodbye. But don’t let her nag and manipulate. Set up the responsibilities clearly and hold her to the agreement. He should make sure that he lives up to his end of bargain also, so not to give her any opportunity to complain.
Lay down the law and don’t deviate.
TG must be nuts to suggest that the dad continue to live in the same household with the mom until the kids grow up. That would be torture!
BTW, I’m not a bitter husband but I’ve seen too many divorces and I know how they usually go.
October 1, 2008 at 2:19 PM #279226patientlywaitingParticipantWomen always complain about their kids and family life especially if it’s not a happy situation.
Women always want something such as more money, help picking up the kids, help watching the kids, help cleaning, etc…, even if they already agreed to taking custody and even after the divorce.
I know it’s sexist to say so, but women always find little things to manipulate. Something always comes up that requires “modifications”.
It’s better to give her her share and get her out of his hair. Be fair to her financially but require that she goes back to work immediately.
If she can’t handle custody of the kids (which she will most likely demand) then take care of them himself, pay her alimony and say goodbye. But don’t let her nag and manipulate. Set up the responsibilities clearly and hold her to the agreement. He should make sure that he lives up to his end of bargain also, so not to give her any opportunity to complain.
Lay down the law and don’t deviate.
TG must be nuts to suggest that the dad continue to live in the same household with the mom until the kids grow up. That would be torture!
BTW, I’m not a bitter husband but I’ve seen too many divorces and I know how they usually go.
October 1, 2008 at 2:19 PM #279263patientlywaitingParticipantWomen always complain about their kids and family life especially if it’s not a happy situation.
Women always want something such as more money, help picking up the kids, help watching the kids, help cleaning, etc…, even if they already agreed to taking custody and even after the divorce.
I know it’s sexist to say so, but women always find little things to manipulate. Something always comes up that requires “modifications”.
It’s better to give her her share and get her out of his hair. Be fair to her financially but require that she goes back to work immediately.
If she can’t handle custody of the kids (which she will most likely demand) then take care of them himself, pay her alimony and say goodbye. But don’t let her nag and manipulate. Set up the responsibilities clearly and hold her to the agreement. He should make sure that he lives up to his end of bargain also, so not to give her any opportunity to complain.
Lay down the law and don’t deviate.
TG must be nuts to suggest that the dad continue to live in the same household with the mom until the kids grow up. That would be torture!
BTW, I’m not a bitter husband but I’ve seen too many divorces and I know how they usually go.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.