- This topic has 70 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 7 months ago by
gandalf.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 3, 2008 at 6:50 PM #251647August 3, 2008 at 8:04 PM #251446
gandalf
ParticipantYeah, but not suggesting speech restrictions or revoking accounts. Suggesting an abuse link, where over the line posts could be ‘voted’ on and if the votes were above a certain threshold, deleted. The community would take care of itself. Seems like it would be easy to implement. I’d be willing to help.
August 3, 2008 at 8:04 PM #251679gandalf
ParticipantYeah, but not suggesting speech restrictions or revoking accounts. Suggesting an abuse link, where over the line posts could be ‘voted’ on and if the votes were above a certain threshold, deleted. The community would take care of itself. Seems like it would be easy to implement. I’d be willing to help.
August 3, 2008 at 8:04 PM #251671gandalf
ParticipantYeah, but not suggesting speech restrictions or revoking accounts. Suggesting an abuse link, where over the line posts could be ‘voted’ on and if the votes were above a certain threshold, deleted. The community would take care of itself. Seems like it would be easy to implement. I’d be willing to help.
August 3, 2008 at 8:04 PM #251605gandalf
ParticipantYeah, but not suggesting speech restrictions or revoking accounts. Suggesting an abuse link, where over the line posts could be ‘voted’ on and if the votes were above a certain threshold, deleted. The community would take care of itself. Seems like it would be easy to implement. I’d be willing to help.
August 3, 2008 at 8:04 PM #251615gandalf
ParticipantYeah, but not suggesting speech restrictions or revoking accounts. Suggesting an abuse link, where over the line posts could be ‘voted’ on and if the votes were above a certain threshold, deleted. The community would take care of itself. Seems like it would be easy to implement. I’d be willing to help.
August 3, 2008 at 8:43 PM #251626urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=gandalf]Yeah, but not suggesting speech restrictions or revoking accounts. Suggesting an abuse link, where over the line posts could be ‘voted’ on and if the votes were above a certain threshold, deleted. The community would take care of itself. Seems like it would be easy to implement. I’d be willing to help.[/quote]
I don’t even like that a little bit.
I agree with the slashdot school of nothing being off limits with regard to discourse.
While I do not agree with many of the people that post here (eg: Ron Paul loving wizards), I think they have the right to do so. I mean its a private blog but the exchange of ideas I consider to be somewhat sacrosanct. Sorry if that seems cheesy but I really do believe it.
August 3, 2008 at 8:43 PM #251699urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=gandalf]Yeah, but not suggesting speech restrictions or revoking accounts. Suggesting an abuse link, where over the line posts could be ‘voted’ on and if the votes were above a certain threshold, deleted. The community would take care of itself. Seems like it would be easy to implement. I’d be willing to help.[/quote]
I don’t even like that a little bit.
I agree with the slashdot school of nothing being off limits with regard to discourse.
While I do not agree with many of the people that post here (eg: Ron Paul loving wizards), I think they have the right to do so. I mean its a private blog but the exchange of ideas I consider to be somewhat sacrosanct. Sorry if that seems cheesy but I really do believe it.
August 3, 2008 at 8:43 PM #251692urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=gandalf]Yeah, but not suggesting speech restrictions or revoking accounts. Suggesting an abuse link, where over the line posts could be ‘voted’ on and if the votes were above a certain threshold, deleted. The community would take care of itself. Seems like it would be easy to implement. I’d be willing to help.[/quote]
I don’t even like that a little bit.
I agree with the slashdot school of nothing being off limits with regard to discourse.
While I do not agree with many of the people that post here (eg: Ron Paul loving wizards), I think they have the right to do so. I mean its a private blog but the exchange of ideas I consider to be somewhat sacrosanct. Sorry if that seems cheesy but I really do believe it.
August 3, 2008 at 8:43 PM #251635urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=gandalf]Yeah, but not suggesting speech restrictions or revoking accounts. Suggesting an abuse link, where over the line posts could be ‘voted’ on and if the votes were above a certain threshold, deleted. The community would take care of itself. Seems like it would be easy to implement. I’d be willing to help.[/quote]
I don’t even like that a little bit.
I agree with the slashdot school of nothing being off limits with regard to discourse.
While I do not agree with many of the people that post here (eg: Ron Paul loving wizards), I think they have the right to do so. I mean its a private blog but the exchange of ideas I consider to be somewhat sacrosanct. Sorry if that seems cheesy but I really do believe it.
August 3, 2008 at 8:43 PM #251466urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=gandalf]Yeah, but not suggesting speech restrictions or revoking accounts. Suggesting an abuse link, where over the line posts could be ‘voted’ on and if the votes were above a certain threshold, deleted. The community would take care of itself. Seems like it would be easy to implement. I’d be willing to help.[/quote]
I don’t even like that a little bit.
I agree with the slashdot school of nothing being off limits with regard to discourse.
While I do not agree with many of the people that post here (eg: Ron Paul loving wizards), I think they have the right to do so. I mean its a private blog but the exchange of ideas I consider to be somewhat sacrosanct. Sorry if that seems cheesy but I really do believe it.
August 3, 2008 at 8:51 PM #251706Aecetia
ParticipantAfter reading some other blogs, even the political bickering on Piggington’s is fairly civilized. I was surprised to see what gets printed and is not deleted elsewhere.
August 3, 2008 at 8:51 PM #251713Aecetia
ParticipantAfter reading some other blogs, even the political bickering on Piggington’s is fairly civilized. I was surprised to see what gets printed and is not deleted elsewhere.
August 3, 2008 at 8:51 PM #251481Aecetia
ParticipantAfter reading some other blogs, even the political bickering on Piggington’s is fairly civilized. I was surprised to see what gets printed and is not deleted elsewhere.
August 3, 2008 at 8:51 PM #251650Aecetia
ParticipantAfter reading some other blogs, even the political bickering on Piggington’s is fairly civilized. I was surprised to see what gets printed and is not deleted elsewhere.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.