- This topic has 65 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 7 months ago by meadandale.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 28, 2010 at 9:54 AM #545036April 28, 2010 at 10:11 AM #545148meadandaleParticipant
[quote=flu][quote=meadandale][quote=flu]
I wish I was CPU bound, but it’s mainly disk at this point. The makefiles (yeah, I know…Makefile, not ant or maven) do massive copies and recopies… (Don’t ask me, ask google)[/quote]Makefiles…ouch. You guys have a continuous integration server setup somewhere? Use your local machine for module builds and have your CI server do full builds?[/quote]
Ha ha ha. CI… That’s a good one. No, unfortunately, my private stuff has no CI (yet)..
No, I don’t work for google. Just use their opensource project(s). And my builds are for private project use. So I have a server at home that does builds and one for the road. I spend more time with me and laptop than me and server.[/quote]You don’t need to work for google to use CI π
You should setup a SCM/CI server to host your code and do your builds. If you only have a copy of your code on your laptop you are just setting yourself up for pain. I’ve had 3 harddrive failures on development machines over the last couple of years. If I didn’t have my code in SCM on another machine (that is backed up) I’d have been screwed.
April 28, 2010 at 10:11 AM #544459meadandaleParticipant[quote=flu][quote=meadandale][quote=flu]
I wish I was CPU bound, but it’s mainly disk at this point. The makefiles (yeah, I know…Makefile, not ant or maven) do massive copies and recopies… (Don’t ask me, ask google)[/quote]Makefiles…ouch. You guys have a continuous integration server setup somewhere? Use your local machine for module builds and have your CI server do full builds?[/quote]
Ha ha ha. CI… That’s a good one. No, unfortunately, my private stuff has no CI (yet)..
No, I don’t work for google. Just use their opensource project(s). And my builds are for private project use. So I have a server at home that does builds and one for the road. I spend more time with me and laptop than me and server.[/quote]You don’t need to work for google to use CI π
You should setup a SCM/CI server to host your code and do your builds. If you only have a copy of your code on your laptop you are just setting yourself up for pain. I’ve had 3 harddrive failures on development machines over the last couple of years. If I didn’t have my code in SCM on another machine (that is backed up) I’d have been screwed.
April 28, 2010 at 10:11 AM #545051meadandaleParticipant[quote=flu][quote=meadandale][quote=flu]
I wish I was CPU bound, but it’s mainly disk at this point. The makefiles (yeah, I know…Makefile, not ant or maven) do massive copies and recopies… (Don’t ask me, ask google)[/quote]Makefiles…ouch. You guys have a continuous integration server setup somewhere? Use your local machine for module builds and have your CI server do full builds?[/quote]
Ha ha ha. CI… That’s a good one. No, unfortunately, my private stuff has no CI (yet)..
No, I don’t work for google. Just use their opensource project(s). And my builds are for private project use. So I have a server at home that does builds and one for the road. I spend more time with me and laptop than me and server.[/quote]You don’t need to work for google to use CI π
You should setup a SCM/CI server to host your code and do your builds. If you only have a copy of your code on your laptop you are just setting yourself up for pain. I’ve had 3 harddrive failures on development machines over the last couple of years. If I didn’t have my code in SCM on another machine (that is backed up) I’d have been screwed.
April 28, 2010 at 10:11 AM #544574meadandaleParticipant[quote=flu][quote=meadandale][quote=flu]
I wish I was CPU bound, but it’s mainly disk at this point. The makefiles (yeah, I know…Makefile, not ant or maven) do massive copies and recopies… (Don’t ask me, ask google)[/quote]Makefiles…ouch. You guys have a continuous integration server setup somewhere? Use your local machine for module builds and have your CI server do full builds?[/quote]
Ha ha ha. CI… That’s a good one. No, unfortunately, my private stuff has no CI (yet)..
No, I don’t work for google. Just use their opensource project(s). And my builds are for private project use. So I have a server at home that does builds and one for the road. I spend more time with me and laptop than me and server.[/quote]You don’t need to work for google to use CI π
You should setup a SCM/CI server to host your code and do your builds. If you only have a copy of your code on your laptop you are just setting yourself up for pain. I’ve had 3 harddrive failures on development machines over the last couple of years. If I didn’t have my code in SCM on another machine (that is backed up) I’d have been screwed.
April 28, 2010 at 10:11 AM #545420meadandaleParticipant[quote=flu][quote=meadandale][quote=flu]
I wish I was CPU bound, but it’s mainly disk at this point. The makefiles (yeah, I know…Makefile, not ant or maven) do massive copies and recopies… (Don’t ask me, ask google)[/quote]Makefiles…ouch. You guys have a continuous integration server setup somewhere? Use your local machine for module builds and have your CI server do full builds?[/quote]
Ha ha ha. CI… That’s a good one. No, unfortunately, my private stuff has no CI (yet)..
No, I don’t work for google. Just use their opensource project(s). And my builds are for private project use. So I have a server at home that does builds and one for the road. I spend more time with me and laptop than me and server.[/quote]You don’t need to work for google to use CI π
You should setup a SCM/CI server to host your code and do your builds. If you only have a copy of your code on your laptop you are just setting yourself up for pain. I’ve had 3 harddrive failures on development machines over the last couple of years. If I didn’t have my code in SCM on another machine (that is backed up) I’d have been screwed.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.