- This topic has 960 replies, 31 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 3 months ago by NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 31, 2011 at 6:32 PM #683479March 31, 2011 at 8:42 PM #682334scaredyclassicParticipant
I saw the videos of the maramallow tests not sure where. They are hilarious, utterly hilarious to watch.
March 31, 2011 at 8:42 PM #682388scaredyclassicParticipantI saw the videos of the maramallow tests not sure where. They are hilarious, utterly hilarious to watch.
March 31, 2011 at 8:42 PM #683008scaredyclassicParticipantI saw the videos of the maramallow tests not sure where. They are hilarious, utterly hilarious to watch.
March 31, 2011 at 8:42 PM #683150scaredyclassicParticipantI saw the videos of the maramallow tests not sure where. They are hilarious, utterly hilarious to watch.
March 31, 2011 at 8:42 PM #683504scaredyclassicParticipantI saw the videos of the maramallow tests not sure where. They are hilarious, utterly hilarious to watch.
April 1, 2011 at 10:18 AM #682428svelteParticipant[quote=eavesdropper]
Unfortunately, other cancers and diseases, for whatever reason, didn’t get the message, and sat by idly while Komen achieved unparalleled success in fundraising. Some of them have picked up on it in the past 5 or 6 years, but I think that the public may have reached the point where they have “ribbon fatigue”.[/quote]Excellent analysis eavesdropper and I suspect you are right on all points.
I also think women are more willing to donate/participate to breast cancer events because they are so attached to that part of their body (only hair ranks above that, in my experience with females) they will do whatever they can to find a cure, while with lung cancer they tend to think “meh, if I don’t smoke I won’t get it.” True or not, I think that is the mindset.
I’m not saying donating is bad, on the contrary. It’s just interesting to observe the trends.
April 1, 2011 at 10:18 AM #682482svelteParticipant[quote=eavesdropper]
Unfortunately, other cancers and diseases, for whatever reason, didn’t get the message, and sat by idly while Komen achieved unparalleled success in fundraising. Some of them have picked up on it in the past 5 or 6 years, but I think that the public may have reached the point where they have “ribbon fatigue”.[/quote]Excellent analysis eavesdropper and I suspect you are right on all points.
I also think women are more willing to donate/participate to breast cancer events because they are so attached to that part of their body (only hair ranks above that, in my experience with females) they will do whatever they can to find a cure, while with lung cancer they tend to think “meh, if I don’t smoke I won’t get it.” True or not, I think that is the mindset.
I’m not saying donating is bad, on the contrary. It’s just interesting to observe the trends.
April 1, 2011 at 10:18 AM #683103svelteParticipant[quote=eavesdropper]
Unfortunately, other cancers and diseases, for whatever reason, didn’t get the message, and sat by idly while Komen achieved unparalleled success in fundraising. Some of them have picked up on it in the past 5 or 6 years, but I think that the public may have reached the point where they have “ribbon fatigue”.[/quote]Excellent analysis eavesdropper and I suspect you are right on all points.
I also think women are more willing to donate/participate to breast cancer events because they are so attached to that part of their body (only hair ranks above that, in my experience with females) they will do whatever they can to find a cure, while with lung cancer they tend to think “meh, if I don’t smoke I won’t get it.” True or not, I think that is the mindset.
I’m not saying donating is bad, on the contrary. It’s just interesting to observe the trends.
April 1, 2011 at 10:18 AM #683246svelteParticipant[quote=eavesdropper]
Unfortunately, other cancers and diseases, for whatever reason, didn’t get the message, and sat by idly while Komen achieved unparalleled success in fundraising. Some of them have picked up on it in the past 5 or 6 years, but I think that the public may have reached the point where they have “ribbon fatigue”.[/quote]Excellent analysis eavesdropper and I suspect you are right on all points.
I also think women are more willing to donate/participate to breast cancer events because they are so attached to that part of their body (only hair ranks above that, in my experience with females) they will do whatever they can to find a cure, while with lung cancer they tend to think “meh, if I don’t smoke I won’t get it.” True or not, I think that is the mindset.
I’m not saying donating is bad, on the contrary. It’s just interesting to observe the trends.
April 1, 2011 at 10:18 AM #683600svelteParticipant[quote=eavesdropper]
Unfortunately, other cancers and diseases, for whatever reason, didn’t get the message, and sat by idly while Komen achieved unparalleled success in fundraising. Some of them have picked up on it in the past 5 or 6 years, but I think that the public may have reached the point where they have “ribbon fatigue”.[/quote]Excellent analysis eavesdropper and I suspect you are right on all points.
I also think women are more willing to donate/participate to breast cancer events because they are so attached to that part of their body (only hair ranks above that, in my experience with females) they will do whatever they can to find a cure, while with lung cancer they tend to think “meh, if I don’t smoke I won’t get it.” True or not, I think that is the mindset.
I’m not saying donating is bad, on the contrary. It’s just interesting to observe the trends.
April 1, 2011 at 11:39 AM #682458bearishgurlParticipantI think Michael Landon, Patrick Swayse and Randy Pausch put their faces on deadly pancreatic cancer, thus putting it on the map. Pausch even appealed to Congress for research funds just weeks before his death in 2008.
And Katie Couric pioneered a successful public information campaign directed to prevention of all colorectal cancers.
Cancer research for cures (and long remissions) is a slow process while many people die waiting. There’s nothing anyone can do about that except to catch it early enough. This is often easier said than done :=(
April 1, 2011 at 11:39 AM #682512bearishgurlParticipantI think Michael Landon, Patrick Swayse and Randy Pausch put their faces on deadly pancreatic cancer, thus putting it on the map. Pausch even appealed to Congress for research funds just weeks before his death in 2008.
And Katie Couric pioneered a successful public information campaign directed to prevention of all colorectal cancers.
Cancer research for cures (and long remissions) is a slow process while many people die waiting. There’s nothing anyone can do about that except to catch it early enough. This is often easier said than done :=(
April 1, 2011 at 11:39 AM #683134bearishgurlParticipantI think Michael Landon, Patrick Swayse and Randy Pausch put their faces on deadly pancreatic cancer, thus putting it on the map. Pausch even appealed to Congress for research funds just weeks before his death in 2008.
And Katie Couric pioneered a successful public information campaign directed to prevention of all colorectal cancers.
Cancer research for cures (and long remissions) is a slow process while many people die waiting. There’s nothing anyone can do about that except to catch it early enough. This is often easier said than done :=(
April 1, 2011 at 11:39 AM #683276bearishgurlParticipantI think Michael Landon, Patrick Swayse and Randy Pausch put their faces on deadly pancreatic cancer, thus putting it on the map. Pausch even appealed to Congress for research funds just weeks before his death in 2008.
And Katie Couric pioneered a successful public information campaign directed to prevention of all colorectal cancers.
Cancer research for cures (and long remissions) is a slow process while many people die waiting. There’s nothing anyone can do about that except to catch it early enough. This is often easier said than done :=(
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.