- This topic has 125 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 1 month ago by LAAFTERHOURS.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 20, 2011 at 11:51 AM #657598January 20, 2011 at 12:11 PM #656481DataAgentParticipant
Check out this fake camera with flashing red lite for less than $5:
A couple of ADT signs and a fake camera or two should keep most people away.
January 20, 2011 at 12:11 PM #656542DataAgentParticipantCheck out this fake camera with flashing red lite for less than $5:
A couple of ADT signs and a fake camera or two should keep most people away.
January 20, 2011 at 12:11 PM #657140DataAgentParticipantCheck out this fake camera with flashing red lite for less than $5:
A couple of ADT signs and a fake camera or two should keep most people away.
January 20, 2011 at 12:11 PM #657279DataAgentParticipantCheck out this fake camera with flashing red lite for less than $5:
A couple of ADT signs and a fake camera or two should keep most people away.
January 20, 2011 at 12:11 PM #657608DataAgentParticipantCheck out this fake camera with flashing red lite for less than $5:
A couple of ADT signs and a fake camera or two should keep most people away.
January 20, 2011 at 12:14 PM #656486briansd1GuestThanks, all. The ADT alarm system is working now and monitored without the contract.
I want to change the designated entry/exit door and they want $175 for that.
There is no wiring to be redone. It’s software. I know there is a way to change the designated door.
I talked the neighbor with the same system. And they want $175 from him too.
January 20, 2011 at 12:14 PM #656547briansd1GuestThanks, all. The ADT alarm system is working now and monitored without the contract.
I want to change the designated entry/exit door and they want $175 for that.
There is no wiring to be redone. It’s software. I know there is a way to change the designated door.
I talked the neighbor with the same system. And they want $175 from him too.
January 20, 2011 at 12:14 PM #657145briansd1GuestThanks, all. The ADT alarm system is working now and monitored without the contract.
I want to change the designated entry/exit door and they want $175 for that.
There is no wiring to be redone. It’s software. I know there is a way to change the designated door.
I talked the neighbor with the same system. And they want $175 from him too.
January 20, 2011 at 12:14 PM #657284briansd1GuestThanks, all. The ADT alarm system is working now and monitored without the contract.
I want to change the designated entry/exit door and they want $175 for that.
There is no wiring to be redone. It’s software. I know there is a way to change the designated door.
I talked the neighbor with the same system. And they want $175 from him too.
January 20, 2011 at 12:14 PM #657613briansd1GuestThanks, all. The ADT alarm system is working now and monitored without the contract.
I want to change the designated entry/exit door and they want $175 for that.
There is no wiring to be redone. It’s software. I know there is a way to change the designated door.
I talked the neighbor with the same system. And they want $175 from him too.
January 20, 2011 at 12:17 PM #656491briansd1Guest[quote=flu]Consider it as a private company trying to pass on additional costs from the Healthcare Reform onto the consumer π
[/quote]Not the same thing IMO. There’s a lot of gouging and unnecessary costs in the health care business.
If everyone had insurance, the idea is that the large insurance companies and/or government can drive down costs by forcing the industry’s hands. The idea is to cap the growth of health care costs as a proportion of GPD so that resources can be more efficiently allocated to other areas of the economy.
January 20, 2011 at 12:17 PM #656552briansd1Guest[quote=flu]Consider it as a private company trying to pass on additional costs from the Healthcare Reform onto the consumer π
[/quote]Not the same thing IMO. There’s a lot of gouging and unnecessary costs in the health care business.
If everyone had insurance, the idea is that the large insurance companies and/or government can drive down costs by forcing the industry’s hands. The idea is to cap the growth of health care costs as a proportion of GPD so that resources can be more efficiently allocated to other areas of the economy.
January 20, 2011 at 12:17 PM #657150briansd1Guest[quote=flu]Consider it as a private company trying to pass on additional costs from the Healthcare Reform onto the consumer π
[/quote]Not the same thing IMO. There’s a lot of gouging and unnecessary costs in the health care business.
If everyone had insurance, the idea is that the large insurance companies and/or government can drive down costs by forcing the industry’s hands. The idea is to cap the growth of health care costs as a proportion of GPD so that resources can be more efficiently allocated to other areas of the economy.
January 20, 2011 at 12:17 PM #657289briansd1Guest[quote=flu]Consider it as a private company trying to pass on additional costs from the Healthcare Reform onto the consumer π
[/quote]Not the same thing IMO. There’s a lot of gouging and unnecessary costs in the health care business.
If everyone had insurance, the idea is that the large insurance companies and/or government can drive down costs by forcing the industry’s hands. The idea is to cap the growth of health care costs as a proportion of GPD so that resources can be more efficiently allocated to other areas of the economy.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.