OT: Addendum to “I Have the Pu**y…” thread – Ladder Theory

[davelj]

This is an off-shoot of the “I Have the Pu**y…” thread. Since the referenced thread seems to be popular, I introduce you to Ladder Theory.

http://www.laddertheory.com/

While I don’t agree with 100% of the Ladder Theory’s conclusions, I agree with probably two-thirds of them, which makes the theory quite robust – in my eyes, at least. (For example, I disagree with one of the major sub-theses that “Men cannot be friends with any woman in which there is no sexual sub-text.”) Now, it’s pretty clear that the guy who came up with this theory has some serious issues with women – the writing is fairly bitter and caustic – but if you can get past that, you’ll see some underlying truths despite that fact.

The most important thing about Ladder Theory is that even if you don’t agree with ANY of it, you’ll find a lot of it pretty funny. And the guy has spent years answering and debating its critics on the internet, which is also pretty funny. You may disagree with his conclusions (as I do on several issues), but he’s clearly not stupid. Anyhow, enjoy.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Dave: You have the courage of a lion. I’m not entirely sure about your sense of self-preservation, but I would strongly advocating bunkering in and getting ready for the cannonade that’s about to follow from the female posters.

Wow. Do you think that guy’s been toasted by a woman once or twice?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Dave: You have the courage of a lion. I’m not entirely sure about your sense of self-preservation, but I would strongly advocating bunkering in and getting ready for the cannonade that’s about to follow from the female posters.

Wow. Do you think that guy’s been toasted by a woman once or twice?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Dave: You have the courage of a lion. I’m not entirely sure about your sense of self-preservation, but I would strongly advocating bunkering in and getting ready for the cannonade that’s about to follow from the female posters.

Wow. Do you think that guy’s been toasted by a woman once or twice?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Dave: You have the courage of a lion. I’m not entirely sure about your sense of self-preservation, but I would strongly advocating bunkering in and getting ready for the cannonade that’s about to follow from the female posters.

Wow. Do you think that guy’s been toasted by a woman once or twice?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Dave: You have the courage of a lion. I’m not entirely sure about your sense of self-preservation, but I would strongly advocating bunkering in and getting ready for the cannonade that’s about to follow from the female posters.

Wow. Do you think that guy’s been toasted by a woman once or twice?

[sdduuuude]

The level of detail in that theory is quite impressive.

[sdduuuude]

The level of detail in that theory is quite impressive.

[sdduuuude]

The level of detail in that theory is quite impressive.

[sdduuuude]

The level of detail in that theory is quite impressive.

[sdduuuude]

The level of detail in that theory is quite impressive.

[davelj]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Dave: You have the courage of a lion. I’m not entirely sure about your sense of self-preservation, but I would strongly advocating bunkering in and getting ready for the cannonade that’s about to follow from the female posters.

Wow. Do you think that guy’s been toasted by a woman once or twice?[/quote]

Oh my, yes – I’d take the over on the once or twice. Part of the problem with his theory is its presentation. It’s over the top. But… try to read past some of that and you’ll see some underlying truths. Again, I don’t advocate Ladder Theory as a Universal Explanation for how men and women interact – by a long shot. But, you have to admit that there’s more truth to it than most would like to admit.

[davelj]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Dave: You have the courage of a lion. I’m not entirely sure about your sense of self-preservation, but I would strongly advocating bunkering in and getting ready for the cannonade that’s about to follow from the female posters.

Wow. Do you think that guy’s been toasted by a woman once or twice?[/quote]

Oh my, yes – I’d take the over on the once or twice. Part of the problem with his theory is its presentation. It’s over the top. But… try to read past some of that and you’ll see some underlying truths. Again, I don’t advocate Ladder Theory as a Universal Explanation for how men and women interact – by a long shot. But, you have to admit that there’s more truth to it than most would like to admit.

[davelj]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Dave: You have the courage of a lion. I’m not entirely sure about your sense of self-preservation, but I would strongly advocating bunkering in and getting ready for the cannonade that’s about to follow from the female posters.

Wow. Do you think that guy’s been toasted by a woman once or twice?[/quote]

Oh my, yes – I’d take the over on the once or twice. Part of the problem with his theory is its presentation. It’s over the top. But… try to read past some of that and you’ll see some underlying truths. Again, I don’t advocate Ladder Theory as a Universal Explanation for how men and women interact – by a long shot. But, you have to admit that there’s more truth to it than most would like to admit.

[davelj]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Dave: You have the courage of a lion. I’m not entirely sure about your sense of self-preservation, but I would strongly advocating bunkering in and getting ready for the cannonade that’s about to follow from the female posters.

Wow. Do you think that guy’s been toasted by a woman once or twice?[/quote]

Oh my, yes – I’d take the over on the once or twice. Part of the problem with his theory is its presentation. It’s over the top. But… try to read past some of that and you’ll see some underlying truths. Again, I don’t advocate Ladder Theory as a Universal Explanation for how men and women interact – by a long shot. But, you have to admit that there’s more truth to it than most would like to admit.

[Author]

Posts