OT: Obama is Conservative

[surveyor]

snl

Personally I’m wondering if he’ll go back to SNL. He did a pretty decent job. I like his “invading her personal space” husband.

Hahaha, watch out, he might hit piggington’s!

[gandalf]

Wow, surveyor, it’s kind of a joke at this point… You don’t really have any specific views on Obama’s foreign policy positions, do you?

Newsweek article says Obama is taking a more pragmatic and conservative approach to AQ, Iraq, Iran, Afg/Pak, Isr/Pal. Would you agree? Extra credit: Discuss the merits of a return to realism in American foreign policy.

That’s the topic. Not sure why you’re here if that doesn’t interest you.

[gandalf]

Wow, surveyor, it’s kind of a joke at this point… You don’t really have any specific views on Obama’s foreign policy positions, do you?

Newsweek article says Obama is taking a more pragmatic and conservative approach to AQ, Iraq, Iran, Afg/Pak, Isr/Pal. Would you agree? Extra credit: Discuss the merits of a return to realism in American foreign policy.

That’s the topic. Not sure why you’re here if that doesn’t interest you.

[gandalf]

Wow, surveyor, it’s kind of a joke at this point… You don’t really have any specific views on Obama’s foreign policy positions, do you?

Newsweek article says Obama is taking a more pragmatic and conservative approach to AQ, Iraq, Iran, Afg/Pak, Isr/Pal. Would you agree? Extra credit: Discuss the merits of a return to realism in American foreign policy.

That’s the topic. Not sure why you’re here if that doesn’t interest you.

[gandalf]

Wow, surveyor, it’s kind of a joke at this point… You don’t really have any specific views on Obama’s foreign policy positions, do you?

Newsweek article says Obama is taking a more pragmatic and conservative approach to AQ, Iraq, Iran, Afg/Pak, Isr/Pal. Would you agree? Extra credit: Discuss the merits of a return to realism in American foreign policy.

That’s the topic. Not sure why you’re here if that doesn’t interest you.

[gandalf]

Wow, surveyor, it’s kind of a joke at this point… You don’t really have any specific views on Obama’s foreign policy positions, do you?

Newsweek article says Obama is taking a more pragmatic and conservative approach to AQ, Iraq, Iran, Afg/Pak, Isr/Pal. Would you agree? Extra credit: Discuss the merits of a return to realism in American foreign policy.

That’s the topic. Not sure why you’re here if that doesn’t interest you.

[surveyor]

gandalf:

I don’t have “specific views” on Obama’s foreign policy? With your reading comprehension already lacking credibility, now it’s taken a turn for the worse. I’ve already stated at length my views of Obama’s foreign policies.

Do yourself a favor and learn how to read.

“Question: Newsweek article says Obama is taking a more pragmatic and conservative approach to AQ, Iraq, Iran, Afg/Pak, Isr/Pal. Would you agree?”

Already asked and answered: IRRELEVANT. (see previous posts).

“Question: Discuss the merits of a return to realism in American foreign policy.”

Already asked and answered: IRRELEVANT. (see previous posts).

There. I’ve spelled it out for you.

=sigh= I think if there’s any joke around here, it’s continuing evidence of your dotage…

[surveyor]

gandalf:

I don’t have “specific views” on Obama’s foreign policy? With your reading comprehension already lacking credibility, now it’s taken a turn for the worse. I’ve already stated at length my views of Obama’s foreign policies.

Do yourself a favor and learn how to read.

“Question: Newsweek article says Obama is taking a more pragmatic and conservative approach to AQ, Iraq, Iran, Afg/Pak, Isr/Pal. Would you agree?”

Already asked and answered: IRRELEVANT. (see previous posts).

“Question: Discuss the merits of a return to realism in American foreign policy.”

Already asked and answered: IRRELEVANT. (see previous posts).

There. I’ve spelled it out for you.

=sigh= I think if there’s any joke around here, it’s continuing evidence of your dotage…

[surveyor]

gandalf:

I don’t have “specific views” on Obama’s foreign policy? With your reading comprehension already lacking credibility, now it’s taken a turn for the worse. I’ve already stated at length my views of Obama’s foreign policies.

Do yourself a favor and learn how to read.

“Question: Newsweek article says Obama is taking a more pragmatic and conservative approach to AQ, Iraq, Iran, Afg/Pak, Isr/Pal. Would you agree?”

Already asked and answered: IRRELEVANT. (see previous posts).

“Question: Discuss the merits of a return to realism in American foreign policy.”

Already asked and answered: IRRELEVANT. (see previous posts).

There. I’ve spelled it out for you.

=sigh= I think if there’s any joke around here, it’s continuing evidence of your dotage…

[surveyor]

gandalf:

I don’t have “specific views” on Obama’s foreign policy? With your reading comprehension already lacking credibility, now it’s taken a turn for the worse. I’ve already stated at length my views of Obama’s foreign policies.

Do yourself a favor and learn how to read.

“Question: Newsweek article says Obama is taking a more pragmatic and conservative approach to AQ, Iraq, Iran, Afg/Pak, Isr/Pal. Would you agree?”

Already asked and answered: IRRELEVANT. (see previous posts).

“Question: Discuss the merits of a return to realism in American foreign policy.”

Already asked and answered: IRRELEVANT. (see previous posts).

There. I’ve spelled it out for you.

=sigh= I think if there’s any joke around here, it’s continuing evidence of your dotage…

[surveyor]

gandalf:

I don’t have “specific views” on Obama’s foreign policy? With your reading comprehension already lacking credibility, now it’s taken a turn for the worse. I’ve already stated at length my views of Obama’s foreign policies.

Do yourself a favor and learn how to read.

“Question: Newsweek article says Obama is taking a more pragmatic and conservative approach to AQ, Iraq, Iran, Afg/Pak, Isr/Pal. Would you agree?”

Already asked and answered: IRRELEVANT. (see previous posts).

“Question: Discuss the merits of a return to realism in American foreign policy.”

Already asked and answered: IRRELEVANT. (see previous posts).

There. I’ve spelled it out for you.

=sigh= I think if there’s any joke around here, it’s continuing evidence of your dotage…

[gandalf]

If you don’t have anything RELEVANT to say, WHY ARE YOU POSTING HERE???

Oh, and another thing. Stop lecturing me about reading comprehension. It’s not like I actually read your posts. They make me cross-eyed. You’re a regular Alice in Wonderland of truth and logic.

BTW, my reading comprehension is excellent. You don’t get to go to places like Columbia without reading comprehension skills. Not sure if you knew about that.

Although I do get bored easily. Especially with your condescending crap. And your partisan rants. I usually tune out when you go in that direction.

OTH, if you stay on topic and make a RELEVANT and cogent point, I might be able to follow.

Nothing substantive, relevant or respectful to contribute? You should try ‘not posting’. That would be the correct decision.

[gandalf]

If you don’t have anything RELEVANT to say, WHY ARE YOU POSTING HERE???

Oh, and another thing. Stop lecturing me about reading comprehension. It’s not like I actually read your posts. They make me cross-eyed. You’re a regular Alice in Wonderland of truth and logic.

BTW, my reading comprehension is excellent. You don’t get to go to places like Columbia without reading comprehension skills. Not sure if you knew about that.

Although I do get bored easily. Especially with your condescending crap. And your partisan rants. I usually tune out when you go in that direction.

OTH, if you stay on topic and make a RELEVANT and cogent point, I might be able to follow.

Nothing substantive, relevant or respectful to contribute? You should try ‘not posting’. That would be the correct decision.

[gandalf]

If you don’t have anything RELEVANT to say, WHY ARE YOU POSTING HERE???

Oh, and another thing. Stop lecturing me about reading comprehension. It’s not like I actually read your posts. They make me cross-eyed. You’re a regular Alice in Wonderland of truth and logic.

BTW, my reading comprehension is excellent. You don’t get to go to places like Columbia without reading comprehension skills. Not sure if you knew about that.

Although I do get bored easily. Especially with your condescending crap. And your partisan rants. I usually tune out when you go in that direction.

OTH, if you stay on topic and make a RELEVANT and cogent point, I might be able to follow.

Nothing substantive, relevant or respectful to contribute? You should try ‘not posting’. That would be the correct decision.

[gandalf]

If you don’t have anything RELEVANT to say, WHY ARE YOU POSTING HERE???

Oh, and another thing. Stop lecturing me about reading comprehension. It’s not like I actually read your posts. They make me cross-eyed. You’re a regular Alice in Wonderland of truth and logic.

BTW, my reading comprehension is excellent. You don’t get to go to places like Columbia without reading comprehension skills. Not sure if you knew about that.

Although I do get bored easily. Especially with your condescending crap. And your partisan rants. I usually tune out when you go in that direction.

OTH, if you stay on topic and make a RELEVANT and cogent point, I might be able to follow.

Nothing substantive, relevant or respectful to contribute? You should try ‘not posting’. That would be the correct decision.

[Author]

Posts