- This topic has 145 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 7 months ago by no_such_reality.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 30, 2010 at 10:51 AM #546260April 30, 2010 at 12:45 PM #545349DWCAPParticipant
I say good for the kid. He paid for his own stuff, instead of getting dad to do it. No different than if dad had forgotten the bread or something, and sent his son to get it, cept that the extra transaction will take like 30 seconds. Considering all the ‘Etiquette’ transgressions that happen in markets, that is a non-starter to me.
My personal favorite is the blank look people give when they are suppose to pay. As if they didnt realize the food wasnt free. “you waited till NOW to pull out your damn wallet!”
April 30, 2010 at 12:45 PM #545462DWCAPParticipantI say good for the kid. He paid for his own stuff, instead of getting dad to do it. No different than if dad had forgotten the bread or something, and sent his son to get it, cept that the extra transaction will take like 30 seconds. Considering all the ‘Etiquette’ transgressions that happen in markets, that is a non-starter to me.
My personal favorite is the blank look people give when they are suppose to pay. As if they didnt realize the food wasnt free. “you waited till NOW to pull out your damn wallet!”
April 30, 2010 at 12:45 PM #545941DWCAPParticipantI say good for the kid. He paid for his own stuff, instead of getting dad to do it. No different than if dad had forgotten the bread or something, and sent his son to get it, cept that the extra transaction will take like 30 seconds. Considering all the ‘Etiquette’ transgressions that happen in markets, that is a non-starter to me.
My personal favorite is the blank look people give when they are suppose to pay. As if they didnt realize the food wasnt free. “you waited till NOW to pull out your damn wallet!”
April 30, 2010 at 12:45 PM #546038DWCAPParticipantI say good for the kid. He paid for his own stuff, instead of getting dad to do it. No different than if dad had forgotten the bread or something, and sent his son to get it, cept that the extra transaction will take like 30 seconds. Considering all the ‘Etiquette’ transgressions that happen in markets, that is a non-starter to me.
My personal favorite is the blank look people give when they are suppose to pay. As if they didnt realize the food wasnt free. “you waited till NOW to pull out your damn wallet!”
April 30, 2010 at 12:45 PM #546310DWCAPParticipantI say good for the kid. He paid for his own stuff, instead of getting dad to do it. No different than if dad had forgotten the bread or something, and sent his son to get it, cept that the extra transaction will take like 30 seconds. Considering all the ‘Etiquette’ transgressions that happen in markets, that is a non-starter to me.
My personal favorite is the blank look people give when they are suppose to pay. As if they didnt realize the food wasnt free. “you waited till NOW to pull out your damn wallet!”
April 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM #545359cdesilva44ParticipantI vote for #2. I probably wouldn’t have been annoyed as long as the kid paid with cash, but if he pulled out a checkbook I might have lost it.
April 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM #545472cdesilva44ParticipantI vote for #2. I probably wouldn’t have been annoyed as long as the kid paid with cash, but if he pulled out a checkbook I might have lost it.
April 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM #545951cdesilva44ParticipantI vote for #2. I probably wouldn’t have been annoyed as long as the kid paid with cash, but if he pulled out a checkbook I might have lost it.
April 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM #546048cdesilva44ParticipantI vote for #2. I probably wouldn’t have been annoyed as long as the kid paid with cash, but if he pulled out a checkbook I might have lost it.
April 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM #546320cdesilva44ParticipantI vote for #2. I probably wouldn’t have been annoyed as long as the kid paid with cash, but if he pulled out a checkbook I might have lost it.
April 30, 2010 at 1:50 PM #545364anParticipant[quote=cdesilva44]I vote for #2. I probably wouldn’t have been annoyed as long as the kid paid with cash, but if he pulled out a checkbook I might have lost it.[/quote]
Why would you? Did the kid stand in line before you got there? Would you have lost it if the kid waited till it’s time for him to check out and he tell the clerk to get the candy for him instead?April 30, 2010 at 1:50 PM #545477anParticipant[quote=cdesilva44]I vote for #2. I probably wouldn’t have been annoyed as long as the kid paid with cash, but if he pulled out a checkbook I might have lost it.[/quote]
Why would you? Did the kid stand in line before you got there? Would you have lost it if the kid waited till it’s time for him to check out and he tell the clerk to get the candy for him instead?April 30, 2010 at 1:50 PM #545956anParticipant[quote=cdesilva44]I vote for #2. I probably wouldn’t have been annoyed as long as the kid paid with cash, but if he pulled out a checkbook I might have lost it.[/quote]
Why would you? Did the kid stand in line before you got there? Would you have lost it if the kid waited till it’s time for him to check out and he tell the clerk to get the candy for him instead?April 30, 2010 at 1:50 PM #546053anParticipant[quote=cdesilva44]I vote for #2. I probably wouldn’t have been annoyed as long as the kid paid with cash, but if he pulled out a checkbook I might have lost it.[/quote]
Why would you? Did the kid stand in line before you got there? Would you have lost it if the kid waited till it’s time for him to check out and he tell the clerk to get the candy for him instead? -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.