Orange County and San Diego flagged as “fairly valued”

This topic has 55 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 8 months ago by Doofrat.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 56 total)

1 2 3 4 →

Author

Posts
March 9, 2008 at 5:06 PM #12044

kev374
Participant

https://www.nationalcity.com/main/micro-site/economics/commentary-analysis/pages/housing-valuation-analysis.asp?WT.redirect=%2Fcorporate%2Feconomicinsight%2Fhousingvaluation%2F

Is this for real? According to them San Diego is .4% overvalued.

March 9, 2008 at 5:20 PM #166382

Ex-SD
Participant

Someone posted that chart in another thread several days ago.

Anybody who uses that information to make a buying decision for a home in SD/Orange County is going to be in for a rude awakening over the next 3-5 years, aren’t they?

March 9, 2008 at 5:20 PM #166804

Ex-SD
Participant

Someone posted that chart in another thread several days ago.

Anybody who uses that information to make a buying decision for a home in SD/Orange County is going to be in for a rude awakening over the next 3-5 years, aren’t they?

March 9, 2008 at 5:20 PM #166742

Ex-SD
Participant

Someone posted that chart in another thread several days ago.

Anybody who uses that information to make a buying decision for a home in SD/Orange County is going to be in for a rude awakening over the next 3-5 years, aren’t they?

March 9, 2008 at 5:20 PM #166710

Ex-SD
Participant

Someone posted that chart in another thread several days ago.

Anybody who uses that information to make a buying decision for a home in SD/Orange County is going to be in for a rude awakening over the next 3-5 years, aren’t they?

March 9, 2008 at 5:20 PM #166702

Ex-SD
Participant

Someone posted that chart in another thread several days ago.

Anybody who uses that information to make a buying decision for a home in SD/Orange County is going to be in for a rude awakening over the next 3-5 years, aren’t they?

March 9, 2008 at 5:33 PM #166713

TheBreeze
Participant

Maybe they meant 0.4x overvalued as opposed to 0.4% overvalued.

March 9, 2008 at 5:33 PM #166720

TheBreeze
Participant

Maybe they meant 0.4x overvalued as opposed to 0.4% overvalued.

March 9, 2008 at 5:33 PM #166394

TheBreeze
Participant

Maybe they meant 0.4x overvalued as opposed to 0.4% overvalued.

March 9, 2008 at 5:33 PM #166752

TheBreeze
Participant

Maybe they meant 0.4x overvalued as opposed to 0.4% overvalued.

March 9, 2008 at 5:33 PM #166814

TheBreeze
Participant

Maybe they meant 0.4x overvalued as opposed to 0.4% overvalued.

March 9, 2008 at 5:34 PM #166819

xironman
Participant

If they rely on that kind of analysis they might make a good short, but it looks like you could have made some money already http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=64242&p=irol-stockQuoteChart

March 9, 2008 at 5:34 PM #166398

xironman
Participant

If they rely on that kind of analysis they might make a good short, but it looks like you could have made some money already http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=64242&p=irol-stockQuoteChart

March 9, 2008 at 5:34 PM #166718

xironman
Participant

If they rely on that kind of analysis they might make a good short, but it looks like you could have made some money already http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=64242&p=irol-stockQuoteChart

March 9, 2008 at 5:34 PM #166725

xironman
Participant

If they rely on that kind of analysis they might make a good short, but it looks like you could have made some money already http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=64242&p=irol-stockQuoteChart
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 56 total)

1 2 3 4 →

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.