- This topic has 330 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 6 months ago by
KSMountain.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 4, 2011 at 7:38 PM #693572May 4, 2011 at 7:48 PM #692402
zippythepinhead
Participanta commited athiest can never be to careful about what he might read. A young athiest named C.S. Lewis read Chesterton’s The Everlasting Man and his life was forever changed. C.S. Lewis later wrote Mere Christianity which is recommended as an intro to those seeking reasons for faith.
May 4, 2011 at 7:48 PM #692478Participanta commited athiest can never be to careful about what he might read. A young athiest named C.S. Lewis read Chesterton’s The Everlasting Man and his life was forever changed. C.S. Lewis later wrote Mere Christianity which is recommended as an intro to those seeking reasons for faith.
May 4, 2011 at 7:48 PM #693080Participanta commited athiest can never be to careful about what he might read. A young athiest named C.S. Lewis read Chesterton’s The Everlasting Man and his life was forever changed. C.S. Lewis later wrote Mere Christianity which is recommended as an intro to those seeking reasons for faith.
May 4, 2011 at 7:48 PM #693226Participanta commited athiest can never be to careful about what he might read. A young athiest named C.S. Lewis read Chesterton’s The Everlasting Man and his life was forever changed. C.S. Lewis later wrote Mere Christianity which is recommended as an intro to those seeking reasons for faith.
May 4, 2011 at 7:48 PM #693577Participanta commited athiest can never be to careful about what he might read. A young athiest named C.S. Lewis read Chesterton’s The Everlasting Man and his life was forever changed. C.S. Lewis later wrote Mere Christianity which is recommended as an intro to those seeking reasons for faith.
May 4, 2011 at 8:10 PM #692407briansd1
Guest[quote=deadzone]I’m not too impressed with our intelligence services if it took them 10 years to find this guy. And even worse, over 6 years in this very suspicious compount right under their noses?
[/quote]Better late than never.
[quote=deadzone]
Of course these guys also thought Iraq had WMD so their track record in Middle Eastern affairs is not good.[/quote]The intelligence services knew there were no WMDs in Iraq. Bush, Cheney & Co. twisted the data to argue that there were WMDs.
May 4, 2011 at 8:10 PM #692483Guest[quote=deadzone]I’m not too impressed with our intelligence services if it took them 10 years to find this guy. And even worse, over 6 years in this very suspicious compount right under their noses?
[/quote]Better late than never.
[quote=deadzone]
Of course these guys also thought Iraq had WMD so their track record in Middle Eastern affairs is not good.[/quote]The intelligence services knew there were no WMDs in Iraq. Bush, Cheney & Co. twisted the data to argue that there were WMDs.
May 4, 2011 at 8:10 PM #693085Guest[quote=deadzone]I’m not too impressed with our intelligence services if it took them 10 years to find this guy. And even worse, over 6 years in this very suspicious compount right under their noses?
[/quote]Better late than never.
[quote=deadzone]
Of course these guys also thought Iraq had WMD so their track record in Middle Eastern affairs is not good.[/quote]The intelligence services knew there were no WMDs in Iraq. Bush, Cheney & Co. twisted the data to argue that there were WMDs.
May 4, 2011 at 8:10 PM #693231Guest[quote=deadzone]I’m not too impressed with our intelligence services if it took them 10 years to find this guy. And even worse, over 6 years in this very suspicious compount right under their noses?
[/quote]Better late than never.
[quote=deadzone]
Of course these guys also thought Iraq had WMD so their track record in Middle Eastern affairs is not good.[/quote]The intelligence services knew there were no WMDs in Iraq. Bush, Cheney & Co. twisted the data to argue that there were WMDs.
May 4, 2011 at 8:10 PM #693582Guest[quote=deadzone]I’m not too impressed with our intelligence services if it took them 10 years to find this guy. And even worse, over 6 years in this very suspicious compount right under their noses?
[/quote]Better late than never.
[quote=deadzone]
Of course these guys also thought Iraq had WMD so their track record in Middle Eastern affairs is not good.[/quote]The intelligence services knew there were no WMDs in Iraq. Bush, Cheney & Co. twisted the data to argue that there were WMDs.
May 5, 2011 at 10:42 AM #692532GuestAccording to a “historian” who has the ear of some politicians, we need biblical justifications for our policies.
That’s pretty extreme crazy, in my opinion.
Mr. Barton is a self-taught historian who is described by several conservative presidential aspirants as a valued adviser and a source of historical and biblical justification for their policies. He is so popular that evangelical pastors travel across states to hear his rapid-fire presentations on how the United States was founded as a Christian nation and is on the road to ruin, thanks to secularists and the Supreme Court, or on the lost political power of the clergy.
He also cites biblical passages that, he says, argue against deficit spending, graduated income taxes, the minimum wage and costly measures to fight global warming.
May 5, 2011 at 10:42 AM #692607GuestAccording to a “historian” who has the ear of some politicians, we need biblical justifications for our policies.
That’s pretty extreme crazy, in my opinion.
Mr. Barton is a self-taught historian who is described by several conservative presidential aspirants as a valued adviser and a source of historical and biblical justification for their policies. He is so popular that evangelical pastors travel across states to hear his rapid-fire presentations on how the United States was founded as a Christian nation and is on the road to ruin, thanks to secularists and the Supreme Court, or on the lost political power of the clergy.
He also cites biblical passages that, he says, argue against deficit spending, graduated income taxes, the minimum wage and costly measures to fight global warming.
May 5, 2011 at 10:42 AM #693208GuestAccording to a “historian” who has the ear of some politicians, we need biblical justifications for our policies.
That’s pretty extreme crazy, in my opinion.
Mr. Barton is a self-taught historian who is described by several conservative presidential aspirants as a valued adviser and a source of historical and biblical justification for their policies. He is so popular that evangelical pastors travel across states to hear his rapid-fire presentations on how the United States was founded as a Christian nation and is on the road to ruin, thanks to secularists and the Supreme Court, or on the lost political power of the clergy.
He also cites biblical passages that, he says, argue against deficit spending, graduated income taxes, the minimum wage and costly measures to fight global warming.
May 5, 2011 at 10:42 AM #693357GuestAccording to a “historian” who has the ear of some politicians, we need biblical justifications for our policies.
That’s pretty extreme crazy, in my opinion.
Mr. Barton is a self-taught historian who is described by several conservative presidential aspirants as a valued adviser and a source of historical and biblical justification for their policies. He is so popular that evangelical pastors travel across states to hear his rapid-fire presentations on how the United States was founded as a Christian nation and is on the road to ruin, thanks to secularists and the Supreme Court, or on the lost political power of the clergy.
He also cites biblical passages that, he says, argue against deficit spending, graduated income taxes, the minimum wage and costly measures to fight global warming.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.