Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Opinion requested on 92104 South Park Area – please
- This topic has 320 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by jpinpb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 25, 2010 at 9:14 AM #572355June 25, 2010 at 9:24 AM #571358sdrealtorParticipant
Just to clarify on CAR’s example and the necessity to peel back the layers:
The house was initially unsellable on the last sale and required all cash. There were many issues with it so it sold below market.
The tax records show $350K not the $330K reported in the MLS.
The flipper did a tremendous job fixing, upgrading and adding to it.
It looks like it fell out of escrow initially because of appraisal issues (thus apparaiser does not = crazy).
The eventual buyer had a loan of $387,500 which suggest they had an 80% LTV at an appraised price at $483,750 and came up with the buyer bringing an additional $41,250 of cash to get the deal done.
Thus it looks like the flipper added about $130K of appraisable value by making it financable and adding considerable improvements.
Not making a judgement here but rather clarifying the facts on this one.
June 25, 2010 at 9:24 AM #571454sdrealtorParticipantJust to clarify on CAR’s example and the necessity to peel back the layers:
The house was initially unsellable on the last sale and required all cash. There were many issues with it so it sold below market.
The tax records show $350K not the $330K reported in the MLS.
The flipper did a tremendous job fixing, upgrading and adding to it.
It looks like it fell out of escrow initially because of appraisal issues (thus apparaiser does not = crazy).
The eventual buyer had a loan of $387,500 which suggest they had an 80% LTV at an appraised price at $483,750 and came up with the buyer bringing an additional $41,250 of cash to get the deal done.
Thus it looks like the flipper added about $130K of appraisable value by making it financable and adding considerable improvements.
Not making a judgement here but rather clarifying the facts on this one.
June 25, 2010 at 9:24 AM #571973sdrealtorParticipantJust to clarify on CAR’s example and the necessity to peel back the layers:
The house was initially unsellable on the last sale and required all cash. There were many issues with it so it sold below market.
The tax records show $350K not the $330K reported in the MLS.
The flipper did a tremendous job fixing, upgrading and adding to it.
It looks like it fell out of escrow initially because of appraisal issues (thus apparaiser does not = crazy).
The eventual buyer had a loan of $387,500 which suggest they had an 80% LTV at an appraised price at $483,750 and came up with the buyer bringing an additional $41,250 of cash to get the deal done.
Thus it looks like the flipper added about $130K of appraisable value by making it financable and adding considerable improvements.
Not making a judgement here but rather clarifying the facts on this one.
June 25, 2010 at 9:24 AM #572081sdrealtorParticipantJust to clarify on CAR’s example and the necessity to peel back the layers:
The house was initially unsellable on the last sale and required all cash. There were many issues with it so it sold below market.
The tax records show $350K not the $330K reported in the MLS.
The flipper did a tremendous job fixing, upgrading and adding to it.
It looks like it fell out of escrow initially because of appraisal issues (thus apparaiser does not = crazy).
The eventual buyer had a loan of $387,500 which suggest they had an 80% LTV at an appraised price at $483,750 and came up with the buyer bringing an additional $41,250 of cash to get the deal done.
Thus it looks like the flipper added about $130K of appraisable value by making it financable and adding considerable improvements.
Not making a judgement here but rather clarifying the facts on this one.
June 25, 2010 at 9:24 AM #572370sdrealtorParticipantJust to clarify on CAR’s example and the necessity to peel back the layers:
The house was initially unsellable on the last sale and required all cash. There were many issues with it so it sold below market.
The tax records show $350K not the $330K reported in the MLS.
The flipper did a tremendous job fixing, upgrading and adding to it.
It looks like it fell out of escrow initially because of appraisal issues (thus apparaiser does not = crazy).
The eventual buyer had a loan of $387,500 which suggest they had an 80% LTV at an appraised price at $483,750 and came up with the buyer bringing an additional $41,250 of cash to get the deal done.
Thus it looks like the flipper added about $130K of appraisable value by making it financable and adding considerable improvements.
Not making a judgement here but rather clarifying the facts on this one.
June 25, 2010 at 11:56 AM #571463pemelizaParticipantjp, have you looked at this one yet:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100035651-92117
I don’t know much about the area but it seems similar to the type of stuff you are looking at.
June 25, 2010 at 11:56 AM #571558pemelizaParticipantjp, have you looked at this one yet:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100035651-92117
I don’t know much about the area but it seems similar to the type of stuff you are looking at.
June 25, 2010 at 11:56 AM #572079pemelizaParticipantjp, have you looked at this one yet:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100035651-92117
I don’t know much about the area but it seems similar to the type of stuff you are looking at.
June 25, 2010 at 11:56 AM #572184pemelizaParticipantjp, have you looked at this one yet:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100035651-92117
I don’t know much about the area but it seems similar to the type of stuff you are looking at.
June 25, 2010 at 11:56 AM #572474pemelizaParticipantjp, have you looked at this one yet:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100035651-92117
I don’t know much about the area but it seems similar to the type of stuff you are looking at.
June 25, 2010 at 1:45 PM #571526jpinpbParticipantThanks, pemeliza. It was on my list to go check out. Does fit many criteria. I’ll have to look at it to see how much of that 12k lot is usable. It might work.
June 25, 2010 at 1:45 PM #571621jpinpbParticipantThanks, pemeliza. It was on my list to go check out. Does fit many criteria. I’ll have to look at it to see how much of that 12k lot is usable. It might work.
June 25, 2010 at 1:45 PM #572141jpinpbParticipantThanks, pemeliza. It was on my list to go check out. Does fit many criteria. I’ll have to look at it to see how much of that 12k lot is usable. It might work.
June 25, 2010 at 1:45 PM #572247jpinpbParticipantThanks, pemeliza. It was on my list to go check out. Does fit many criteria. I’ll have to look at it to see how much of that 12k lot is usable. It might work.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.