- This topic has 10 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 6 months ago by
Sandi Egan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
September 18, 2007 at 9:15 AM #10330
-
September 18, 2007 at 9:27 AM #84955
lonestar2000
ParticipantThe news just keeps getting uglier. It continues to amaze me how some people can STILL come on this board and make statements to the contrary.
The writing is on the wall, we have seen nothing yet and it’s all down hill from here.
-
September 18, 2007 at 9:32 AM #84958
no_such_reality
ParticipantMaybe people would get it if they translated it to a yearly number. 5% of ALL homes will forclose this year in California.
Foreclosures cluster, currently monthly new foreclosures exceed sales volume in most communities with notable foreclosures.
-
September 18, 2007 at 9:57 AM #84963
patientlywaiting
ParticipantI didn’t expect things to get this bad, this fast. The economy is apparently still strong. What will happen as the economy weakens and teeters on the verge of recession?
-
September 18, 2007 at 10:02 AM #84962
NotCranky
Participant“Maybe people would get it if they translated it to a yearly number. 5% of ALL homes will forclose this year in California.”
That is 1 in 20 houses this year. That can’t be right?
Edit: Perusing Craig’s list I got an idea for a new monitor. “The Second Hand Office Furniture Monitor.” There is a ton of it and many of the adds include indications that it is RE office related, naturally.
-
September 18, 2007 at 10:15 AM #84967
cr
ParticipantRustico, the number should be 0.5%, 1 in 200. The article said 1 in 224 so that’s 0.446%.
Still it’s astounding. How many homes are sold a year in CA?
-
September 18, 2007 at 10:30 AM #84971
brian_in_la
ParticipantHere are the ugly Realtytrac numbers
NOD NTS REO
Jul-07 27,071 7,498 4,444
Aug-07 41,714 7,590 8,571
Yikes…very nasty months ahead…isn't about now that someone piles on with that ARM reset chart?
ps…
Aug-06 10,862 1,437 207
-
September 18, 2007 at 10:36 AM #84974
NotCranky
ParticipantThanks Coop,
The 5% comment got me looking at it as 1 in 224 for August alone, or roughly 12 per year from the same 224. I didn’t follow that the month was already adjusted to an annual rate. Actually, from a causual look, on the street looks a lot more serious than 1-224 per year.
-
September 18, 2007 at 10:58 AM #84981
CardiffBaseball
ParticipantCombine these sorts of numbers with Jim the Realtor’s recent report on Sales figures and you have ugliness.
-
September 18, 2007 at 11:07 AM #84982
ibjames
Participantyou would think blatent ugliness like this would have a bigger impact on pricing
-
September 18, 2007 at 11:19 AM #84985
Sandi Egan
ParticipantREO
Jul-07 4,444
Aug-07 8,571Hovnanian did one good thing – showed the overstocked builders and banks the way out.
-
-
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.