- This topic has 125 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 9 months ago by
robson.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 23, 2008 at 10:59 PM #159112February 23, 2008 at 11:27 PM #158767
one_muggle
ParticipantReal estate always comes back
I don’t know dude, there are a couple of significant trends that could make any significant rebound pretty far off.
For the last 30 yrs housing prices have gotten a boost from ever lower interest rates, and that will almost certainly not be the case over the next 30 yrs.
Baby boomers are beginning to switch from net home buyers to net home sellers, which is a trend that will get worse since a large fraction of them planned (and/or will need) to sell their house to fund retirement.
RE in some areas, like NYC and San Fran will probably always bounce back, but one industry towns, like Vegas, have a history of staying busted. Post-steel boom areas like Pennsylvania and upstate NY have never recovered the loss of that industry.
I don’t doubt that people will keep on gambling, but the water situation in the Southwest is getting dire, and will put a limit on growth, while surrounding states relax ordinances on local gambling. Though, the crappy dollar is keeping people in the states, so you have that going for you.
IMHO the odds on an eventual (~decade) RE recovery in Vegas are not bad, but I don’t think it is a certainty. There’s an awful lot of still-overpriced inventory, and not all that much demand. It’s kind of hard to see what is going to fuel another boom.
Good luck.February 23, 2008 at 11:27 PM #159059one_muggle
ParticipantReal estate always comes back
I don’t know dude, there are a couple of significant trends that could make any significant rebound pretty far off.
For the last 30 yrs housing prices have gotten a boost from ever lower interest rates, and that will almost certainly not be the case over the next 30 yrs.
Baby boomers are beginning to switch from net home buyers to net home sellers, which is a trend that will get worse since a large fraction of them planned (and/or will need) to sell their house to fund retirement.
RE in some areas, like NYC and San Fran will probably always bounce back, but one industry towns, like Vegas, have a history of staying busted. Post-steel boom areas like Pennsylvania and upstate NY have never recovered the loss of that industry.
I don’t doubt that people will keep on gambling, but the water situation in the Southwest is getting dire, and will put a limit on growth, while surrounding states relax ordinances on local gambling. Though, the crappy dollar is keeping people in the states, so you have that going for you.
IMHO the odds on an eventual (~decade) RE recovery in Vegas are not bad, but I don’t think it is a certainty. There’s an awful lot of still-overpriced inventory, and not all that much demand. It’s kind of hard to see what is going to fuel another boom.
Good luck.February 23, 2008 at 11:27 PM #159071one_muggle
ParticipantReal estate always comes back
I don’t know dude, there are a couple of significant trends that could make any significant rebound pretty far off.
For the last 30 yrs housing prices have gotten a boost from ever lower interest rates, and that will almost certainly not be the case over the next 30 yrs.
Baby boomers are beginning to switch from net home buyers to net home sellers, which is a trend that will get worse since a large fraction of them planned (and/or will need) to sell their house to fund retirement.
RE in some areas, like NYC and San Fran will probably always bounce back, but one industry towns, like Vegas, have a history of staying busted. Post-steel boom areas like Pennsylvania and upstate NY have never recovered the loss of that industry.
I don’t doubt that people will keep on gambling, but the water situation in the Southwest is getting dire, and will put a limit on growth, while surrounding states relax ordinances on local gambling. Though, the crappy dollar is keeping people in the states, so you have that going for you.
IMHO the odds on an eventual (~decade) RE recovery in Vegas are not bad, but I don’t think it is a certainty. There’s an awful lot of still-overpriced inventory, and not all that much demand. It’s kind of hard to see what is going to fuel another boom.
Good luck.February 23, 2008 at 11:27 PM #159078one_muggle
ParticipantReal estate always comes back
I don’t know dude, there are a couple of significant trends that could make any significant rebound pretty far off.
For the last 30 yrs housing prices have gotten a boost from ever lower interest rates, and that will almost certainly not be the case over the next 30 yrs.
Baby boomers are beginning to switch from net home buyers to net home sellers, which is a trend that will get worse since a large fraction of them planned (and/or will need) to sell their house to fund retirement.
RE in some areas, like NYC and San Fran will probably always bounce back, but one industry towns, like Vegas, have a history of staying busted. Post-steel boom areas like Pennsylvania and upstate NY have never recovered the loss of that industry.
I don’t doubt that people will keep on gambling, but the water situation in the Southwest is getting dire, and will put a limit on growth, while surrounding states relax ordinances on local gambling. Though, the crappy dollar is keeping people in the states, so you have that going for you.
IMHO the odds on an eventual (~decade) RE recovery in Vegas are not bad, but I don’t think it is a certainty. There’s an awful lot of still-overpriced inventory, and not all that much demand. It’s kind of hard to see what is going to fuel another boom.
Good luck.February 23, 2008 at 11:27 PM #159153one_muggle
ParticipantReal estate always comes back
I don’t know dude, there are a couple of significant trends that could make any significant rebound pretty far off.
For the last 30 yrs housing prices have gotten a boost from ever lower interest rates, and that will almost certainly not be the case over the next 30 yrs.
Baby boomers are beginning to switch from net home buyers to net home sellers, which is a trend that will get worse since a large fraction of them planned (and/or will need) to sell their house to fund retirement.
RE in some areas, like NYC and San Fran will probably always bounce back, but one industry towns, like Vegas, have a history of staying busted. Post-steel boom areas like Pennsylvania and upstate NY have never recovered the loss of that industry.
I don’t doubt that people will keep on gambling, but the water situation in the Southwest is getting dire, and will put a limit on growth, while surrounding states relax ordinances on local gambling. Though, the crappy dollar is keeping people in the states, so you have that going for you.
IMHO the odds on an eventual (~decade) RE recovery in Vegas are not bad, but I don’t think it is a certainty. There’s an awful lot of still-overpriced inventory, and not all that much demand. It’s kind of hard to see what is going to fuel another boom.
Good luck.February 24, 2008 at 1:14 AM #158787Mean Reversion
ParticipantReal estate always comes back.
Sure it does. But isn’t it important how long it takes?
Are we talking 2 years or 20 years? That’s kinda important dontcha think?
February 24, 2008 at 1:14 AM #159079Mean Reversion
ParticipantReal estate always comes back.
Sure it does. But isn’t it important how long it takes?
Are we talking 2 years or 20 years? That’s kinda important dontcha think?
February 24, 2008 at 1:14 AM #159091Mean Reversion
ParticipantReal estate always comes back.
Sure it does. But isn’t it important how long it takes?
Are we talking 2 years or 20 years? That’s kinda important dontcha think?
February 24, 2008 at 1:14 AM #159098Mean Reversion
ParticipantReal estate always comes back.
Sure it does. But isn’t it important how long it takes?
Are we talking 2 years or 20 years? That’s kinda important dontcha think?
February 24, 2008 at 1:14 AM #159173Mean Reversion
ParticipantReal estate always comes back.
Sure it does. But isn’t it important how long it takes?
Are we talking 2 years or 20 years? That’s kinda important dontcha think?
February 24, 2008 at 1:20 AM #158792Eugene
ParticipantI personally know a guy who’s most likely underwater even though he bought his house with 20% down of his hard earned money. I tried to talk him out of the purchase, too.
Unless he loses his job, he won’t walk away. There’s no point. His monthly carrying costs are MAYBE $500 more than it would cost him to rent a comparable house. Is $500/month worth ruining your credit history?
Don’t assume that everyone who’s underwater will walk.
February 24, 2008 at 1:20 AM #159084Eugene
ParticipantI personally know a guy who’s most likely underwater even though he bought his house with 20% down of his hard earned money. I tried to talk him out of the purchase, too.
Unless he loses his job, he won’t walk away. There’s no point. His monthly carrying costs are MAYBE $500 more than it would cost him to rent a comparable house. Is $500/month worth ruining your credit history?
Don’t assume that everyone who’s underwater will walk.
February 24, 2008 at 1:20 AM #159096Eugene
ParticipantI personally know a guy who’s most likely underwater even though he bought his house with 20% down of his hard earned money. I tried to talk him out of the purchase, too.
Unless he loses his job, he won’t walk away. There’s no point. His monthly carrying costs are MAYBE $500 more than it would cost him to rent a comparable house. Is $500/month worth ruining your credit history?
Don’t assume that everyone who’s underwater will walk.
February 24, 2008 at 1:20 AM #159103Eugene
ParticipantI personally know a guy who’s most likely underwater even though he bought his house with 20% down of his hard earned money. I tried to talk him out of the purchase, too.
Unless he loses his job, he won’t walk away. There’s no point. His monthly carrying costs are MAYBE $500 more than it would cost him to rent a comparable house. Is $500/month worth ruining your credit history?
Don’t assume that everyone who’s underwater will walk.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
