Wow Equalizer, way to jump to irrational conclusions.
My point was quite simple, she just gaffed. I could understand people be riled if she was promoting hate, I don’t think she was. That’s the point. Everybody is screaming like she’s promoting hate and they are over reacting.
As for public broadcast channels, people have a right to react to what is said on them. As for Imus, I didn’t pay any attention at all. I simply don’t care.
I’m more concerned about the Farrakhans and Dukes of the world. Should they be stifled? No, unless they go to far.
Can you scream fire in a crowded theatre, No. It is the same thing.
equalizer: Spence, huh? I preferred “Justice for None”. It seemed more coherent, at least to me. Aren’t you supposed to recommend “Anarchist’s Cookbook” when recommending “Turner Diaries”? I thought they were a matched set.
Only problem with the “Turner Diaries” is that I start seeing black helicopters every time I read it.
equalizer: Spence, huh? I preferred “Justice for None”. It seemed more coherent, at least to me. Aren’t you supposed to recommend “Anarchist’s Cookbook” when recommending “Turner Diaries”? I thought they were a matched set.
Only problem with the “Turner Diaries” is that I start seeing black helicopters every time I read it.
equalizer: Spence, huh? I preferred “Justice for None”. It seemed more coherent, at least to me. Aren’t you supposed to recommend “Anarchist’s Cookbook” when recommending “Turner Diaries”? I thought they were a matched set.
Only problem with the “Turner Diaries” is that I start seeing black helicopters every time I read it.
equalizer: Spence, huh? I preferred “Justice for None”. It seemed more coherent, at least to me. Aren’t you supposed to recommend “Anarchist’s Cookbook” when recommending “Turner Diaries”? I thought they were a matched set.
Only problem with the “Turner Diaries” is that I start seeing black helicopters every time I read it.
