- This topic has 550 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by
eccen in esc.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 8, 2008 at 9:20 PM #132594January 8, 2008 at 9:22 PM #132311
equalizer
Participant“Its obvious that all YOU people obsess about race and catergorize everything and everyone by it. Maybe if YOU people had some smarts you would have real jobs and not have to be jealous of worthy people and call us names. Instead of “earning” social science degree or getting law degrees to sue wealth creators like Angelo Mozillo, you people should start working and stop being socialist Piggts. You people need to take personal responsibility.”
Anonymous
January 8, 2008 at 9:22 PM #132495Participant“Its obvious that all YOU people obsess about race and catergorize everything and everyone by it. Maybe if YOU people had some smarts you would have real jobs and not have to be jealous of worthy people and call us names. Instead of “earning” social science degree or getting law degrees to sue wealth creators like Angelo Mozillo, you people should start working and stop being socialist Piggts. You people need to take personal responsibility.”
Anonymous
January 8, 2008 at 9:22 PM #132501Participant“Its obvious that all YOU people obsess about race and catergorize everything and everyone by it. Maybe if YOU people had some smarts you would have real jobs and not have to be jealous of worthy people and call us names. Instead of “earning” social science degree or getting law degrees to sue wealth creators like Angelo Mozillo, you people should start working and stop being socialist Piggts. You people need to take personal responsibility.”
Anonymous
January 8, 2008 at 9:22 PM #132563Participant“Its obvious that all YOU people obsess about race and catergorize everything and everyone by it. Maybe if YOU people had some smarts you would have real jobs and not have to be jealous of worthy people and call us names. Instead of “earning” social science degree or getting law degrees to sue wealth creators like Angelo Mozillo, you people should start working and stop being socialist Piggts. You people need to take personal responsibility.”
Anonymous
January 8, 2008 at 9:22 PM #132599Participant“Its obvious that all YOU people obsess about race and catergorize everything and everyone by it. Maybe if YOU people had some smarts you would have real jobs and not have to be jealous of worthy people and call us names. Instead of “earning” social science degree or getting law degrees to sue wealth creators like Angelo Mozillo, you people should start working and stop being socialist Piggts. You people need to take personal responsibility.”
Anonymous
January 8, 2008 at 9:45 PM #132321ParticipantFrom FOX:
During their usual post-round banter as they wrapped up Day 2 at the Plantation Course at Kapalua, Tilghman and cohort Nick Faldo discussed young players who could possibly challenge Tiger. Faldo, ever the joker, said perhaps the youngsters should “gang up (on Tiger) for a while.” The pair laughed a bit before Tilghman responded by saying, “Lynch him in a back alley.” The pair chuckled awkwardly before moving on.This happended on Fri or Sun and you people still cant get over it, Woods did.
Mark Steinberg, Woods’ agent, said, “It is a complete non-issue. Kelly and Tiger are friends. It might have been a poor choice of words, but there was absolutely no ill intent whatsoever.”
Associated content said it best:
“What will become of Tilghman remains to be seen. Perhaps in a show that we have grown past the point of overreacting to this type of public guffaw, nothing will become of the incident. Maybe then, we can truly move beyond racism in sports.”I read 8000+ comments on yahoo and 500 on Fox page. its pretty clear you people are just jealous of this beautiful lady who obviously earns her 100,000+ salary with her alluring beauty not her witty dialogue. Here is good one that descibes most of the comments:
“I don’t think being a minority makes you a victim of anything except numbers.”
January 8, 2008 at 9:45 PM #132505ParticipantFrom FOX:
During their usual post-round banter as they wrapped up Day 2 at the Plantation Course at Kapalua, Tilghman and cohort Nick Faldo discussed young players who could possibly challenge Tiger. Faldo, ever the joker, said perhaps the youngsters should “gang up (on Tiger) for a while.” The pair laughed a bit before Tilghman responded by saying, “Lynch him in a back alley.” The pair chuckled awkwardly before moving on.This happended on Fri or Sun and you people still cant get over it, Woods did.
Mark Steinberg, Woods’ agent, said, “It is a complete non-issue. Kelly and Tiger are friends. It might have been a poor choice of words, but there was absolutely no ill intent whatsoever.”
Associated content said it best:
“What will become of Tilghman remains to be seen. Perhaps in a show that we have grown past the point of overreacting to this type of public guffaw, nothing will become of the incident. Maybe then, we can truly move beyond racism in sports.”I read 8000+ comments on yahoo and 500 on Fox page. its pretty clear you people are just jealous of this beautiful lady who obviously earns her 100,000+ salary with her alluring beauty not her witty dialogue. Here is good one that descibes most of the comments:
“I don’t think being a minority makes you a victim of anything except numbers.”
January 8, 2008 at 9:45 PM #132511ParticipantFrom FOX:
During their usual post-round banter as they wrapped up Day 2 at the Plantation Course at Kapalua, Tilghman and cohort Nick Faldo discussed young players who could possibly challenge Tiger. Faldo, ever the joker, said perhaps the youngsters should “gang up (on Tiger) for a while.” The pair laughed a bit before Tilghman responded by saying, “Lynch him in a back alley.” The pair chuckled awkwardly before moving on.This happended on Fri or Sun and you people still cant get over it, Woods did.
Mark Steinberg, Woods’ agent, said, “It is a complete non-issue. Kelly and Tiger are friends. It might have been a poor choice of words, but there was absolutely no ill intent whatsoever.”
Associated content said it best:
“What will become of Tilghman remains to be seen. Perhaps in a show that we have grown past the point of overreacting to this type of public guffaw, nothing will become of the incident. Maybe then, we can truly move beyond racism in sports.”I read 8000+ comments on yahoo and 500 on Fox page. its pretty clear you people are just jealous of this beautiful lady who obviously earns her 100,000+ salary with her alluring beauty not her witty dialogue. Here is good one that descibes most of the comments:
“I don’t think being a minority makes you a victim of anything except numbers.”
January 8, 2008 at 9:45 PM #132573ParticipantFrom FOX:
During their usual post-round banter as they wrapped up Day 2 at the Plantation Course at Kapalua, Tilghman and cohort Nick Faldo discussed young players who could possibly challenge Tiger. Faldo, ever the joker, said perhaps the youngsters should “gang up (on Tiger) for a while.” The pair laughed a bit before Tilghman responded by saying, “Lynch him in a back alley.” The pair chuckled awkwardly before moving on.This happended on Fri or Sun and you people still cant get over it, Woods did.
Mark Steinberg, Woods’ agent, said, “It is a complete non-issue. Kelly and Tiger are friends. It might have been a poor choice of words, but there was absolutely no ill intent whatsoever.”
Associated content said it best:
“What will become of Tilghman remains to be seen. Perhaps in a show that we have grown past the point of overreacting to this type of public guffaw, nothing will become of the incident. Maybe then, we can truly move beyond racism in sports.”I read 8000+ comments on yahoo and 500 on Fox page. its pretty clear you people are just jealous of this beautiful lady who obviously earns her 100,000+ salary with her alluring beauty not her witty dialogue. Here is good one that descibes most of the comments:
“I don’t think being a minority makes you a victim of anything except numbers.”
January 8, 2008 at 9:45 PM #132609ParticipantFrom FOX:
During their usual post-round banter as they wrapped up Day 2 at the Plantation Course at Kapalua, Tilghman and cohort Nick Faldo discussed young players who could possibly challenge Tiger. Faldo, ever the joker, said perhaps the youngsters should “gang up (on Tiger) for a while.” The pair laughed a bit before Tilghman responded by saying, “Lynch him in a back alley.” The pair chuckled awkwardly before moving on.This happended on Fri or Sun and you people still cant get over it, Woods did.
Mark Steinberg, Woods’ agent, said, “It is a complete non-issue. Kelly and Tiger are friends. It might have been a poor choice of words, but there was absolutely no ill intent whatsoever.”
Associated content said it best:
“What will become of Tilghman remains to be seen. Perhaps in a show that we have grown past the point of overreacting to this type of public guffaw, nothing will become of the incident. Maybe then, we can truly move beyond racism in sports.”I read 8000+ comments on yahoo and 500 on Fox page. its pretty clear you people are just jealous of this beautiful lady who obviously earns her 100,000+ salary with her alluring beauty not her witty dialogue. Here is good one that descibes most of the comments:
“I don’t think being a minority makes you a victim of anything except numbers.”
January 8, 2008 at 10:16 PM #132366NotCranky
ParticipantThink about that for a moment; and then ask yourself whether you would be willing to vote for a Catholic…
Why not? I think a persons faith is not automatically a big issue. If a candidate panders and plys believers that is a big strike against them in my book. Rejection of equal political representation, on the basis religious opinion, however superior in the soundness of its derivation, is a failure on the part of the politician who practices that way.
I am not against atheism either but from what I have seen atheists are not generally speaking evolved significantly so that rule by them would make things better. Main benefit would be no religious schizms to ply domestically or internationally.Being what we are we would probably try to force the world to comply with our national atheism and find them coming up short so that we could justify taking their lives, oil or whatever. Didn’t someone do that already?
Somebody pass me a bottle!
January 8, 2008 at 10:16 PM #132550ParticipantThink about that for a moment; and then ask yourself whether you would be willing to vote for a Catholic…
Why not? I think a persons faith is not automatically a big issue. If a candidate panders and plys believers that is a big strike against them in my book. Rejection of equal political representation, on the basis religious opinion, however superior in the soundness of its derivation, is a failure on the part of the politician who practices that way.
I am not against atheism either but from what I have seen atheists are not generally speaking evolved significantly so that rule by them would make things better. Main benefit would be no religious schizms to ply domestically or internationally.Being what we are we would probably try to force the world to comply with our national atheism and find them coming up short so that we could justify taking their lives, oil or whatever. Didn’t someone do that already?
Somebody pass me a bottle!
January 8, 2008 at 10:16 PM #132556ParticipantThink about that for a moment; and then ask yourself whether you would be willing to vote for a Catholic…
Why not? I think a persons faith is not automatically a big issue. If a candidate panders and plys believers that is a big strike against them in my book. Rejection of equal political representation, on the basis religious opinion, however superior in the soundness of its derivation, is a failure on the part of the politician who practices that way.
I am not against atheism either but from what I have seen atheists are not generally speaking evolved significantly so that rule by them would make things better. Main benefit would be no religious schizms to ply domestically or internationally.Being what we are we would probably try to force the world to comply with our national atheism and find them coming up short so that we could justify taking their lives, oil or whatever. Didn’t someone do that already?
Somebody pass me a bottle!
January 8, 2008 at 10:16 PM #132618ParticipantThink about that for a moment; and then ask yourself whether you would be willing to vote for a Catholic…
Why not? I think a persons faith is not automatically a big issue. If a candidate panders and plys believers that is a big strike against them in my book. Rejection of equal political representation, on the basis religious opinion, however superior in the soundness of its derivation, is a failure on the part of the politician who practices that way.
I am not against atheism either but from what I have seen atheists are not generally speaking evolved significantly so that rule by them would make things better. Main benefit would be no religious schizms to ply domestically or internationally.Being what we are we would probably try to force the world to comply with our national atheism and find them coming up short so that we could justify taking their lives, oil or whatever. Didn’t someone do that already?
Somebody pass me a bottle!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.