- This topic has 1,260 replies, 39 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by
ucodegen.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 9, 2009 at 12:25 PM #467066October 9, 2009 at 12:27 PM #466259
CricketOnTheHearth
ParticipantBut what were the choices?
Would Clinton (Hillary edition) have done any different? I’m sure McSame wouldn’t.
Ron Paul would have taken names, I bet. A few “executive orders” or something.
… nnnn, and maybe not lasted through May, either.
(disclaimer: I’m not a Paulie but he seems to be one of the few in Congress with a backbone re the Fed, banks etc)
October 9, 2009 at 12:27 PM #466444ParticipantBut what were the choices?
Would Clinton (Hillary edition) have done any different? I’m sure McSame wouldn’t.
Ron Paul would have taken names, I bet. A few “executive orders” or something.
… nnnn, and maybe not lasted through May, either.
(disclaimer: I’m not a Paulie but he seems to be one of the few in Congress with a backbone re the Fed, banks etc)
October 9, 2009 at 12:27 PM #466794ParticipantBut what were the choices?
Would Clinton (Hillary edition) have done any different? I’m sure McSame wouldn’t.
Ron Paul would have taken names, I bet. A few “executive orders” or something.
… nnnn, and maybe not lasted through May, either.
(disclaimer: I’m not a Paulie but he seems to be one of the few in Congress with a backbone re the Fed, banks etc)
October 9, 2009 at 12:27 PM #466865ParticipantBut what were the choices?
Would Clinton (Hillary edition) have done any different? I’m sure McSame wouldn’t.
Ron Paul would have taken names, I bet. A few “executive orders” or something.
… nnnn, and maybe not lasted through May, either.
(disclaimer: I’m not a Paulie but he seems to be one of the few in Congress with a backbone re the Fed, banks etc)
October 9, 2009 at 12:27 PM #467071ParticipantBut what were the choices?
Would Clinton (Hillary edition) have done any different? I’m sure McSame wouldn’t.
Ron Paul would have taken names, I bet. A few “executive orders” or something.
… nnnn, and maybe not lasted through May, either.
(disclaimer: I’m not a Paulie but he seems to be one of the few in Congress with a backbone re the Fed, banks etc)
October 9, 2009 at 12:40 PM #466269XBoxBoy
Participant[quote=scaredycat]hasn’t the moon been screwing with our moods long enough/ Affecting women’s cycles and causing lycanthropy.[/quote]
Yeah, and those wandering planets better get in line fast I tell you, or they’re next!
October 9, 2009 at 12:40 PM #466454Participant[quote=scaredycat]hasn’t the moon been screwing with our moods long enough/ Affecting women’s cycles and causing lycanthropy.[/quote]
Yeah, and those wandering planets better get in line fast I tell you, or they’re next!
October 9, 2009 at 12:40 PM #466804Participant[quote=scaredycat]hasn’t the moon been screwing with our moods long enough/ Affecting women’s cycles and causing lycanthropy.[/quote]
Yeah, and those wandering planets better get in line fast I tell you, or they’re next!
October 9, 2009 at 12:40 PM #466875Participant[quote=scaredycat]hasn’t the moon been screwing with our moods long enough/ Affecting women’s cycles and causing lycanthropy.[/quote]
Yeah, and those wandering planets better get in line fast I tell you, or they’re next!
October 9, 2009 at 12:40 PM #467081Participant[quote=scaredycat]hasn’t the moon been screwing with our moods long enough/ Affecting women’s cycles and causing lycanthropy.[/quote]
Yeah, and those wandering planets better get in line fast I tell you, or they’re next!
October 9, 2009 at 1:13 PM #466279Portlock
Participant[quote=afx114]Wow that’s pretty stupid that the voting happened before he even had a chance to do anything. I’m an Obama supporter and I think this is weird. All my Obama-supporting friends think it’s weird too.
Maybe it was his speech on race relations from March 08?
But still, it’s weird.[/quote]
Agreed, it is weird. But I guess the guy just inspired so many people during a time when they really needed to be inspired, that he was recognized for it.
What does this say about the previous administration or the direction of the country before he was elected?
October 9, 2009 at 1:13 PM #466464Participant[quote=afx114]Wow that’s pretty stupid that the voting happened before he even had a chance to do anything. I’m an Obama supporter and I think this is weird. All my Obama-supporting friends think it’s weird too.
Maybe it was his speech on race relations from March 08?
But still, it’s weird.[/quote]
Agreed, it is weird. But I guess the guy just inspired so many people during a time when they really needed to be inspired, that he was recognized for it.
What does this say about the previous administration or the direction of the country before he was elected?
October 9, 2009 at 1:13 PM #466814Participant[quote=afx114]Wow that’s pretty stupid that the voting happened before he even had a chance to do anything. I’m an Obama supporter and I think this is weird. All my Obama-supporting friends think it’s weird too.
Maybe it was his speech on race relations from March 08?
But still, it’s weird.[/quote]
Agreed, it is weird. But I guess the guy just inspired so many people during a time when they really needed to be inspired, that he was recognized for it.
What does this say about the previous administration or the direction of the country before he was elected?
October 9, 2009 at 1:13 PM #466885Participant[quote=afx114]Wow that’s pretty stupid that the voting happened before he even had a chance to do anything. I’m an Obama supporter and I think this is weird. All my Obama-supporting friends think it’s weird too.
Maybe it was his speech on race relations from March 08?
But still, it’s weird.[/quote]
Agreed, it is weird. But I guess the guy just inspired so many people during a time when they really needed to be inspired, that he was recognized for it.
What does this say about the previous administration or the direction of the country before he was elected?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
