- This topic has 1,004 replies, 42 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by
urbanrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 14, 2011 at 4:58 PM #704596June 14, 2011 at 5:01 PM #703411
Zeitgeist
ParticipantGood job Brian. Any idea how many of those banks donated to his campaign?
June 14, 2011 at 5:01 PM #703506ParticipantGood job Brian. Any idea how many of those banks donated to his campaign?
June 14, 2011 at 5:01 PM #704098ParticipantGood job Brian. Any idea how many of those banks donated to his campaign?
June 14, 2011 at 5:01 PM #704246ParticipantGood job Brian. Any idea how many of those banks donated to his campaign?
June 14, 2011 at 5:01 PM #704607ParticipantGood job Brian. Any idea how many of those banks donated to his campaign?
June 14, 2011 at 5:10 PM #703416briansd1
Guest[quote=Zeitgeist]Good job Brian. Any idea how many of those banks donated to his campaign?[/quote]
Wall Street supported Obama prior to the 2008 financial crisis, but the financial industry has been very unhappy lately with Obama’s support of financial regulations and consumer protection.
It looks like many Wall Street executives have shifted support to the Republicans.
There is bad blood better Wall Street and Obama.
Obama is however looking to regain support by the financial industry.
June 14, 2011 at 5:10 PM #703511Guest[quote=Zeitgeist]Good job Brian. Any idea how many of those banks donated to his campaign?[/quote]
Wall Street supported Obama prior to the 2008 financial crisis, but the financial industry has been very unhappy lately with Obama’s support of financial regulations and consumer protection.
It looks like many Wall Street executives have shifted support to the Republicans.
There is bad blood better Wall Street and Obama.
Obama is however looking to regain support by the financial industry.
June 14, 2011 at 5:10 PM #704103Guest[quote=Zeitgeist]Good job Brian. Any idea how many of those banks donated to his campaign?[/quote]
Wall Street supported Obama prior to the 2008 financial crisis, but the financial industry has been very unhappy lately with Obama’s support of financial regulations and consumer protection.
It looks like many Wall Street executives have shifted support to the Republicans.
There is bad blood better Wall Street and Obama.
Obama is however looking to regain support by the financial industry.
June 14, 2011 at 5:10 PM #704251Guest[quote=Zeitgeist]Good job Brian. Any idea how many of those banks donated to his campaign?[/quote]
Wall Street supported Obama prior to the 2008 financial crisis, but the financial industry has been very unhappy lately with Obama’s support of financial regulations and consumer protection.
It looks like many Wall Street executives have shifted support to the Republicans.
There is bad blood better Wall Street and Obama.
Obama is however looking to regain support by the financial industry.
June 14, 2011 at 5:10 PM #704612Guest[quote=Zeitgeist]Good job Brian. Any idea how many of those banks donated to his campaign?[/quote]
Wall Street supported Obama prior to the 2008 financial crisis, but the financial industry has been very unhappy lately with Obama’s support of financial regulations and consumer protection.
It looks like many Wall Street executives have shifted support to the Republicans.
There is bad blood better Wall Street and Obama.
Obama is however looking to regain support by the financial industry.
June 14, 2011 at 6:20 PM #703421Allan from Fallbrook
Participant[quote=briansd1]
I absolutely agree that both parties are to blame.
But there’s such thing as proportional liability, and I contend that Republicans are more at fault.
[/quote]
Brian: You crack me up. You’re like a dog with a bone. Or a badger.
Your comment above about proportional liability is akin to saying, “Yes, both Dems and Repubs set the house afire. It is now fully engulfed in flames. However, the Repubs set MORE of the house alight than the Dems”.
Given that the house is burning down, does it really matter? Shouldn’t putting the fire out be the major priority? At some point, it becomes the question of how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.
I don’t bear any animus towards Obama and had a few minutes of hope that he’d be somewhat or somehow different from all of the other lying shitbags that hold public office. He isn’t. If he doesn’t focus on JOBS and tax reform and right now, come 2012 he’s toast. It really is that simple and all of the talk about which party is more responsible doesn’t mean shit to those families that cannot pay their bills, or cover their mortgage, or are dealing with a primary breadwinner out of work. We are looking catastrophe in the face and anyone not willing to confront THAT reality and have an adult conversation about saving our Goddamn country is an asshole.
June 14, 2011 at 6:20 PM #703516Participant[quote=briansd1]
I absolutely agree that both parties are to blame.
But there’s such thing as proportional liability, and I contend that Republicans are more at fault.
[/quote]
Brian: You crack me up. You’re like a dog with a bone. Or a badger.
Your comment above about proportional liability is akin to saying, “Yes, both Dems and Repubs set the house afire. It is now fully engulfed in flames. However, the Repubs set MORE of the house alight than the Dems”.
Given that the house is burning down, does it really matter? Shouldn’t putting the fire out be the major priority? At some point, it becomes the question of how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.
I don’t bear any animus towards Obama and had a few minutes of hope that he’d be somewhat or somehow different from all of the other lying shitbags that hold public office. He isn’t. If he doesn’t focus on JOBS and tax reform and right now, come 2012 he’s toast. It really is that simple and all of the talk about which party is more responsible doesn’t mean shit to those families that cannot pay their bills, or cover their mortgage, or are dealing with a primary breadwinner out of work. We are looking catastrophe in the face and anyone not willing to confront THAT reality and have an adult conversation about saving our Goddamn country is an asshole.
June 14, 2011 at 6:20 PM #704108Participant[quote=briansd1]
I absolutely agree that both parties are to blame.
But there’s such thing as proportional liability, and I contend that Republicans are more at fault.
[/quote]
Brian: You crack me up. You’re like a dog with a bone. Or a badger.
Your comment above about proportional liability is akin to saying, “Yes, both Dems and Repubs set the house afire. It is now fully engulfed in flames. However, the Repubs set MORE of the house alight than the Dems”.
Given that the house is burning down, does it really matter? Shouldn’t putting the fire out be the major priority? At some point, it becomes the question of how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.
I don’t bear any animus towards Obama and had a few minutes of hope that he’d be somewhat or somehow different from all of the other lying shitbags that hold public office. He isn’t. If he doesn’t focus on JOBS and tax reform and right now, come 2012 he’s toast. It really is that simple and all of the talk about which party is more responsible doesn’t mean shit to those families that cannot pay their bills, or cover their mortgage, or are dealing with a primary breadwinner out of work. We are looking catastrophe in the face and anyone not willing to confront THAT reality and have an adult conversation about saving our Goddamn country is an asshole.
June 14, 2011 at 6:20 PM #704256Participant[quote=briansd1]
I absolutely agree that both parties are to blame.
But there’s such thing as proportional liability, and I contend that Republicans are more at fault.
[/quote]
Brian: You crack me up. You’re like a dog with a bone. Or a badger.
Your comment above about proportional liability is akin to saying, “Yes, both Dems and Repubs set the house afire. It is now fully engulfed in flames. However, the Repubs set MORE of the house alight than the Dems”.
Given that the house is burning down, does it really matter? Shouldn’t putting the fire out be the major priority? At some point, it becomes the question of how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.
I don’t bear any animus towards Obama and had a few minutes of hope that he’d be somewhat or somehow different from all of the other lying shitbags that hold public office. He isn’t. If he doesn’t focus on JOBS and tax reform and right now, come 2012 he’s toast. It really is that simple and all of the talk about which party is more responsible doesn’t mean shit to those families that cannot pay their bills, or cover their mortgage, or are dealing with a primary breadwinner out of work. We are looking catastrophe in the face and anyone not willing to confront THAT reality and have an adult conversation about saving our Goddamn country is an asshole.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.