- This topic has 1,004 replies, 42 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by
urbanrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 13, 2009 at 8:35 PM #483561November 13, 2009 at 9:06 PM #482728
briansd1
Guest[quote=patb]
What Bush couldn’t run the government run media?
just another item of incompetence.[/quote]
hahahaha… hillarious. Made my evening!!
November 13, 2009 at 9:06 PM #482895Guest[quote=patb]
What Bush couldn’t run the government run media?
just another item of incompetence.[/quote]
hahahaha… hillarious. Made my evening!!
November 13, 2009 at 9:06 PM #483265Guest[quote=patb]
What Bush couldn’t run the government run media?
just another item of incompetence.[/quote]
hahahaha… hillarious. Made my evening!!
November 13, 2009 at 9:06 PM #483345Guest[quote=patb]
What Bush couldn’t run the government run media?
just another item of incompetence.[/quote]
hahahaha… hillarious. Made my evening!!
November 13, 2009 at 9:06 PM #483571Guest[quote=patb]
What Bush couldn’t run the government run media?
just another item of incompetence.[/quote]
hahahaha… hillarious. Made my evening!!
November 13, 2009 at 10:52 PM #482774Jim Jones
ParticipantWhy is that every defense of Obama’s behavior has to be(minimized, justified, validated) ect. by the missteps of Bush. All most all of the replies on this thread defending Obama’s actions are fallacies.
To those who many no know…… a straw man is a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue.
Why not address the specific behavior of Obama? Is it really that difficult to defend his positions?
November 13, 2009 at 10:52 PM #482940ParticipantWhy is that every defense of Obama’s behavior has to be(minimized, justified, validated) ect. by the missteps of Bush. All most all of the replies on this thread defending Obama’s actions are fallacies.
To those who many no know…… a straw man is a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue.
Why not address the specific behavior of Obama? Is it really that difficult to defend his positions?
November 13, 2009 at 10:52 PM #483311ParticipantWhy is that every defense of Obama’s behavior has to be(minimized, justified, validated) ect. by the missteps of Bush. All most all of the replies on this thread defending Obama’s actions are fallacies.
To those who many no know…… a straw man is a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue.
Why not address the specific behavior of Obama? Is it really that difficult to defend his positions?
November 13, 2009 at 10:52 PM #483391ParticipantWhy is that every defense of Obama’s behavior has to be(minimized, justified, validated) ect. by the missteps of Bush. All most all of the replies on this thread defending Obama’s actions are fallacies.
To those who many no know…… a straw man is a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue.
Why not address the specific behavior of Obama? Is it really that difficult to defend his positions?
November 13, 2009 at 10:52 PM #483616ParticipantWhy is that every defense of Obama’s behavior has to be(minimized, justified, validated) ect. by the missteps of Bush. All most all of the replies on this thread defending Obama’s actions are fallacies.
To those who many no know…… a straw man is a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue.
Why not address the specific behavior of Obama? Is it really that difficult to defend his positions?
November 13, 2009 at 11:05 PM #482783Arraya
Participant[quote=Casca]John, add to the list the decision this morning to try Khalid Sheik Mohammad (KSM), the 911 mastermind, in federal court in NYC. An absolute travesty of justice. Had the current course with the military tribunals been allowed to run in Gitmo, he was a month away from a death sentance. Now we’ll spend a prince’s ransom to both defend and prosecute him in a court where he will be allowed full constitutional protections. This fuck should have been dead a long time ago. There is evil upon the land.[/quote]
haha… A travesty of justice is to let the justice department to work
Doublethink at it’s best.
to hold simultaneously two opinions which canceled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic
The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them….To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed
November 13, 2009 at 11:05 PM #482950Participant[quote=Casca]John, add to the list the decision this morning to try Khalid Sheik Mohammad (KSM), the 911 mastermind, in federal court in NYC. An absolute travesty of justice. Had the current course with the military tribunals been allowed to run in Gitmo, he was a month away from a death sentance. Now we’ll spend a prince’s ransom to both defend and prosecute him in a court where he will be allowed full constitutional protections. This fuck should have been dead a long time ago. There is evil upon the land.[/quote]
haha… A travesty of justice is to let the justice department to work
Doublethink at it’s best.
to hold simultaneously two opinions which canceled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic
The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them….To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed
November 13, 2009 at 11:05 PM #483320Participant[quote=Casca]John, add to the list the decision this morning to try Khalid Sheik Mohammad (KSM), the 911 mastermind, in federal court in NYC. An absolute travesty of justice. Had the current course with the military tribunals been allowed to run in Gitmo, he was a month away from a death sentance. Now we’ll spend a prince’s ransom to both defend and prosecute him in a court where he will be allowed full constitutional protections. This fuck should have been dead a long time ago. There is evil upon the land.[/quote]
haha… A travesty of justice is to let the justice department to work
Doublethink at it’s best.
to hold simultaneously two opinions which canceled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic
The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them….To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed
November 13, 2009 at 11:05 PM #483401Participant[quote=Casca]John, add to the list the decision this morning to try Khalid Sheik Mohammad (KSM), the 911 mastermind, in federal court in NYC. An absolute travesty of justice. Had the current course with the military tribunals been allowed to run in Gitmo, he was a month away from a death sentance. Now we’ll spend a prince’s ransom to both defend and prosecute him in a court where he will be allowed full constitutional protections. This fuck should have been dead a long time ago. There is evil upon the land.[/quote]
haha… A travesty of justice is to let the justice department to work
Doublethink at it’s best.
to hold simultaneously two opinions which canceled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic
The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them….To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.