- This topic has 785 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 9 months ago by SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 8, 2010 at 9:09 AM #511428February 8, 2010 at 9:24 AM #510536blahblahblahParticipant
You get 3 months or until the end of the current lease, whichever is greater.
That’s great actually, I didn’t know that. Did you see the videos in Vegas where the sheriff shows up and then tenants have to move that day? I guess the laws in CA are better for tenants. Still it sucks to have to move, it sucks to have to find a rent house, even with 3 months notice. The guy can afford a $500K house on his $250K income, no problem. So what if he bought a house. Hell he deserves a medal as far as I’m concerned, because most people with that kind of income would have tried to buy (and probably succeeded) a $1M McMansion.
February 8, 2010 at 9:24 AM #510681blahblahblahParticipantYou get 3 months or until the end of the current lease, whichever is greater.
That’s great actually, I didn’t know that. Did you see the videos in Vegas where the sheriff shows up and then tenants have to move that day? I guess the laws in CA are better for tenants. Still it sucks to have to move, it sucks to have to find a rent house, even with 3 months notice. The guy can afford a $500K house on his $250K income, no problem. So what if he bought a house. Hell he deserves a medal as far as I’m concerned, because most people with that kind of income would have tried to buy (and probably succeeded) a $1M McMansion.
February 8, 2010 at 9:24 AM #511094blahblahblahParticipantYou get 3 months or until the end of the current lease, whichever is greater.
That’s great actually, I didn’t know that. Did you see the videos in Vegas where the sheriff shows up and then tenants have to move that day? I guess the laws in CA are better for tenants. Still it sucks to have to move, it sucks to have to find a rent house, even with 3 months notice. The guy can afford a $500K house on his $250K income, no problem. So what if he bought a house. Hell he deserves a medal as far as I’m concerned, because most people with that kind of income would have tried to buy (and probably succeeded) a $1M McMansion.
February 8, 2010 at 9:24 AM #511187blahblahblahParticipantYou get 3 months or until the end of the current lease, whichever is greater.
That’s great actually, I didn’t know that. Did you see the videos in Vegas where the sheriff shows up and then tenants have to move that day? I guess the laws in CA are better for tenants. Still it sucks to have to move, it sucks to have to find a rent house, even with 3 months notice. The guy can afford a $500K house on his $250K income, no problem. So what if he bought a house. Hell he deserves a medal as far as I’m concerned, because most people with that kind of income would have tried to buy (and probably succeeded) a $1M McMansion.
February 8, 2010 at 9:24 AM #511438blahblahblahParticipantYou get 3 months or until the end of the current lease, whichever is greater.
That’s great actually, I didn’t know that. Did you see the videos in Vegas where the sheriff shows up and then tenants have to move that day? I guess the laws in CA are better for tenants. Still it sucks to have to move, it sucks to have to find a rent house, even with 3 months notice. The guy can afford a $500K house on his $250K income, no problem. So what if he bought a house. Hell he deserves a medal as far as I’m concerned, because most people with that kind of income would have tried to buy (and probably succeeded) a $1M McMansion.
February 8, 2010 at 9:40 AM #510551sdduuuudeParticipant[quote=sdrealtor] … the vast majority of your neighbors are just as responsible as you are.[/quote]
Probably so, but it takes a vast minority of households to go bad to affect the market. The market is priced on the margin, which means all house values fluctuate based on only those that sell.
I can’t argue that this market is currently stable, but I can’t see round 2 missing this market. A nasty stock market year could really hurt the high end, though it would take time to manifest itself.
February 8, 2010 at 9:40 AM #510696sdduuuudeParticipant[quote=sdrealtor] … the vast majority of your neighbors are just as responsible as you are.[/quote]
Probably so, but it takes a vast minority of households to go bad to affect the market. The market is priced on the margin, which means all house values fluctuate based on only those that sell.
I can’t argue that this market is currently stable, but I can’t see round 2 missing this market. A nasty stock market year could really hurt the high end, though it would take time to manifest itself.
February 8, 2010 at 9:40 AM #511109sdduuuudeParticipant[quote=sdrealtor] … the vast majority of your neighbors are just as responsible as you are.[/quote]
Probably so, but it takes a vast minority of households to go bad to affect the market. The market is priced on the margin, which means all house values fluctuate based on only those that sell.
I can’t argue that this market is currently stable, but I can’t see round 2 missing this market. A nasty stock market year could really hurt the high end, though it would take time to manifest itself.
February 8, 2010 at 9:40 AM #511202sdduuuudeParticipant[quote=sdrealtor] … the vast majority of your neighbors are just as responsible as you are.[/quote]
Probably so, but it takes a vast minority of households to go bad to affect the market. The market is priced on the margin, which means all house values fluctuate based on only those that sell.
I can’t argue that this market is currently stable, but I can’t see round 2 missing this market. A nasty stock market year could really hurt the high end, though it would take time to manifest itself.
February 8, 2010 at 9:40 AM #511453sdduuuudeParticipant[quote=sdrealtor] … the vast majority of your neighbors are just as responsible as you are.[/quote]
Probably so, but it takes a vast minority of households to go bad to affect the market. The market is priced on the margin, which means all house values fluctuate based on only those that sell.
I can’t argue that this market is currently stable, but I can’t see round 2 missing this market. A nasty stock market year could really hurt the high end, though it would take time to manifest itself.
February 8, 2010 at 11:04 AM #510626anParticipant[quote=JohnAlt91941]Since a realtor wrote it, and most realtors wouldn’t admit a bubble until it bit them, I took that to mean at least near the peak. 500k was entry level around that time.
Buying a home happens for most people once or twice. A lot more due dilegence is expected than from someone who regularly invests in a 401k. Timing the stock market is a fool’s game, but you’d think someone would notice the ridiculous appreciation during the most recent housing bubble. Maybe this guy pulling in 250k thought everyone else was too.[/quote]
That’s the thing. We don’t know enough information to make any judgment. So, to call something stupid for doing something you wouldn’t, although you don’t have all the information is well…February 8, 2010 at 11:04 AM #510772anParticipant[quote=JohnAlt91941]Since a realtor wrote it, and most realtors wouldn’t admit a bubble until it bit them, I took that to mean at least near the peak. 500k was entry level around that time.
Buying a home happens for most people once or twice. A lot more due dilegence is expected than from someone who regularly invests in a 401k. Timing the stock market is a fool’s game, but you’d think someone would notice the ridiculous appreciation during the most recent housing bubble. Maybe this guy pulling in 250k thought everyone else was too.[/quote]
That’s the thing. We don’t know enough information to make any judgment. So, to call something stupid for doing something you wouldn’t, although you don’t have all the information is well…February 8, 2010 at 11:04 AM #511184anParticipant[quote=JohnAlt91941]Since a realtor wrote it, and most realtors wouldn’t admit a bubble until it bit them, I took that to mean at least near the peak. 500k was entry level around that time.
Buying a home happens for most people once or twice. A lot more due dilegence is expected than from someone who regularly invests in a 401k. Timing the stock market is a fool’s game, but you’d think someone would notice the ridiculous appreciation during the most recent housing bubble. Maybe this guy pulling in 250k thought everyone else was too.[/quote]
That’s the thing. We don’t know enough information to make any judgment. So, to call something stupid for doing something you wouldn’t, although you don’t have all the information is well…February 8, 2010 at 11:04 AM #511277anParticipant[quote=JohnAlt91941]Since a realtor wrote it, and most realtors wouldn’t admit a bubble until it bit them, I took that to mean at least near the peak. 500k was entry level around that time.
Buying a home happens for most people once or twice. A lot more due dilegence is expected than from someone who regularly invests in a 401k. Timing the stock market is a fool’s game, but you’d think someone would notice the ridiculous appreciation during the most recent housing bubble. Maybe this guy pulling in 250k thought everyone else was too.[/quote]
That’s the thing. We don’t know enough information to make any judgment. So, to call something stupid for doing something you wouldn’t, although you don’t have all the information is well… -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.