Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Non-salary CA budget cuts
- This topic has 380 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 6 months ago by NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 20, 2009 at 3:19 PM #403845May 20, 2009 at 3:25 PM #403152Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipant
[quote=Eugene][quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]
So what about City and county salaries ???I bet it get above $100B once you count thoese.
I wonder where it all fits in,
This should be interesting, It’s going to be painful but I think a mass Local (city/county) and State BK is the only answer.
[/quote]
City and county salaries are not paid from state budgets. [/quote]
Yes but the governator is thinking of taking these funds as well.
May 20, 2009 at 3:25 PM #403404Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipant[quote=Eugene][quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]
So what about City and county salaries ???I bet it get above $100B once you count thoese.
I wonder where it all fits in,
This should be interesting, It’s going to be painful but I think a mass Local (city/county) and State BK is the only answer.
[/quote]
City and county salaries are not paid from state budgets. [/quote]
Yes but the governator is thinking of taking these funds as well.
May 20, 2009 at 3:25 PM #403641Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipant[quote=Eugene][quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]
So what about City and county salaries ???I bet it get above $100B once you count thoese.
I wonder where it all fits in,
This should be interesting, It’s going to be painful but I think a mass Local (city/county) and State BK is the only answer.
[/quote]
City and county salaries are not paid from state budgets. [/quote]
Yes but the governator is thinking of taking these funds as well.
May 20, 2009 at 3:25 PM #403700Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipant[quote=Eugene][quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]
So what about City and county salaries ???I bet it get above $100B once you count thoese.
I wonder where it all fits in,
This should be interesting, It’s going to be painful but I think a mass Local (city/county) and State BK is the only answer.
[/quote]
City and county salaries are not paid from state budgets. [/quote]
Yes but the governator is thinking of taking these funds as well.
May 20, 2009 at 3:25 PM #403850Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipant[quote=Eugene][quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]
So what about City and county salaries ???I bet it get above $100B once you count thoese.
I wonder where it all fits in,
This should be interesting, It’s going to be painful but I think a mass Local (city/county) and State BK is the only answer.
[/quote]
City and county salaries are not paid from state budgets. [/quote]
Yes but the governator is thinking of taking these funds as well.
May 20, 2009 at 3:26 PM #403157EugeneParticipant[quote=meadandale]
There is no justification for salaries AS HIGH or higher than the private sector IN CONJUNCTION WITH gold plated retirement benefits.I mean, come on, retiring at 50 with 100% of your highest salary FOR LIFE?[/quote]
If you believe that, why are you still employed in the private sector?
Senior programmers often make 100-120K in San Diego, to 150K in Silicon Valley. An equivalent state job for a guy with similar experience would pay 60-75K. People ONLY take those public sector jobs because of benefits. Because public sector salaries suck.
May 20, 2009 at 3:26 PM #403409EugeneParticipant[quote=meadandale]
There is no justification for salaries AS HIGH or higher than the private sector IN CONJUNCTION WITH gold plated retirement benefits.I mean, come on, retiring at 50 with 100% of your highest salary FOR LIFE?[/quote]
If you believe that, why are you still employed in the private sector?
Senior programmers often make 100-120K in San Diego, to 150K in Silicon Valley. An equivalent state job for a guy with similar experience would pay 60-75K. People ONLY take those public sector jobs because of benefits. Because public sector salaries suck.
May 20, 2009 at 3:26 PM #403646EugeneParticipant[quote=meadandale]
There is no justification for salaries AS HIGH or higher than the private sector IN CONJUNCTION WITH gold plated retirement benefits.I mean, come on, retiring at 50 with 100% of your highest salary FOR LIFE?[/quote]
If you believe that, why are you still employed in the private sector?
Senior programmers often make 100-120K in San Diego, to 150K in Silicon Valley. An equivalent state job for a guy with similar experience would pay 60-75K. People ONLY take those public sector jobs because of benefits. Because public sector salaries suck.
May 20, 2009 at 3:26 PM #403705EugeneParticipant[quote=meadandale]
There is no justification for salaries AS HIGH or higher than the private sector IN CONJUNCTION WITH gold plated retirement benefits.I mean, come on, retiring at 50 with 100% of your highest salary FOR LIFE?[/quote]
If you believe that, why are you still employed in the private sector?
Senior programmers often make 100-120K in San Diego, to 150K in Silicon Valley. An equivalent state job for a guy with similar experience would pay 60-75K. People ONLY take those public sector jobs because of benefits. Because public sector salaries suck.
May 20, 2009 at 3:26 PM #403855EugeneParticipant[quote=meadandale]
There is no justification for salaries AS HIGH or higher than the private sector IN CONJUNCTION WITH gold plated retirement benefits.I mean, come on, retiring at 50 with 100% of your highest salary FOR LIFE?[/quote]
If you believe that, why are you still employed in the private sector?
Senior programmers often make 100-120K in San Diego, to 150K in Silicon Valley. An equivalent state job for a guy with similar experience would pay 60-75K. People ONLY take those public sector jobs because of benefits. Because public sector salaries suck.
May 20, 2009 at 3:31 PM #403167Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipant[quote=Eugene][quote=meadandale]
There is no justification for salaries AS HIGH or higher than the private sector IN CONJUNCTION WITH gold plated retirement benefits.I mean, come on, retiring at 50 with 100% of your highest salary FOR LIFE?[/quote]
If you believe that, why are you still employed in the private sector?
Senior programmers often make 100-120K in San Diego, to 150K in Silicon Valley. An equivalent state job for a guy with similar experience would pay 60-75K. People ONLY take those public sector jobs because of benefits. Because public sector salaries suck.
[/quote]
Not L.A. city, I know line men working for LADWP making over 150K a year, same for fire men and police.
And yea I kick myself for not grabing one of these Jobs when I was young, I say if you are not going to really make something of your self (doctor etc…) then grab a city job while you are yong and stick with it, that would be my advice.
May 20, 2009 at 3:31 PM #403419Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipant[quote=Eugene][quote=meadandale]
There is no justification for salaries AS HIGH or higher than the private sector IN CONJUNCTION WITH gold plated retirement benefits.I mean, come on, retiring at 50 with 100% of your highest salary FOR LIFE?[/quote]
If you believe that, why are you still employed in the private sector?
Senior programmers often make 100-120K in San Diego, to 150K in Silicon Valley. An equivalent state job for a guy with similar experience would pay 60-75K. People ONLY take those public sector jobs because of benefits. Because public sector salaries suck.
[/quote]
Not L.A. city, I know line men working for LADWP making over 150K a year, same for fire men and police.
And yea I kick myself for not grabing one of these Jobs when I was young, I say if you are not going to really make something of your self (doctor etc…) then grab a city job while you are yong and stick with it, that would be my advice.
May 20, 2009 at 3:31 PM #403656Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipant[quote=Eugene][quote=meadandale]
There is no justification for salaries AS HIGH or higher than the private sector IN CONJUNCTION WITH gold plated retirement benefits.I mean, come on, retiring at 50 with 100% of your highest salary FOR LIFE?[/quote]
If you believe that, why are you still employed in the private sector?
Senior programmers often make 100-120K in San Diego, to 150K in Silicon Valley. An equivalent state job for a guy with similar experience would pay 60-75K. People ONLY take those public sector jobs because of benefits. Because public sector salaries suck.
[/quote]
Not L.A. city, I know line men working for LADWP making over 150K a year, same for fire men and police.
And yea I kick myself for not grabing one of these Jobs when I was young, I say if you are not going to really make something of your self (doctor etc…) then grab a city job while you are yong and stick with it, that would be my advice.
May 20, 2009 at 3:31 PM #403715Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipant[quote=Eugene][quote=meadandale]
There is no justification for salaries AS HIGH or higher than the private sector IN CONJUNCTION WITH gold plated retirement benefits.I mean, come on, retiring at 50 with 100% of your highest salary FOR LIFE?[/quote]
If you believe that, why are you still employed in the private sector?
Senior programmers often make 100-120K in San Diego, to 150K in Silicon Valley. An equivalent state job for a guy with similar experience would pay 60-75K. People ONLY take those public sector jobs because of benefits. Because public sector salaries suck.
[/quote]
Not L.A. city, I know line men working for LADWP making over 150K a year, same for fire men and police.
And yea I kick myself for not grabing one of these Jobs when I was young, I say if you are not going to really make something of your self (doctor etc…) then grab a city job while you are yong and stick with it, that would be my advice.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.