- This topic has 6 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 5 months ago by .
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
660 million is nothing.
With a population of over 10 million that works out to about 66 dollars per person. That doesn’t even buy a pair of jeans, much less a house. And that’s assuming it’s all being paid to people who still live in the city (which it’s not)
660 million is nothing.
With a population of over 10 million that works out to about 66 dollars per person. That doesn’t even buy a pair of jeans, much less a house. And that’s assuming it’s all being paid to people who still live in the city (which it’s not)
Not only that, this is LA. People will spend it on boob jobs, Ferraris, and a platinum plated grill, before they do something sensible like buy a house entirely.
Not only that, this is LA. People will spend it on boob jobs, Ferraris, and a platinum plated grill, before they do something sensible like buy a house entirely.
Actually it is more like a million+ $ for 500 or so plaintiffs. A drop in the bucket in LA. And sadly, a good chunk of that goes to lawyers.
Another question: How many of you think the LA Archdiocese will go bankruptcy route to save their assets. It happened here with Portland Diocese. If that happens, the plaintiffs will collect even less than the 660 million judgment.
Actually it is more like a million+ $ for 500 or so plaintiffs. A drop in the bucket in LA. And sadly, a good chunk of that goes to lawyers.
Another question: How many of you think the LA Archdiocese will go bankruptcy route to save their assets. It happened here with Portland Diocese. If that happens, the plaintiffs will collect even less than the 660 million judgment.