- This topic has 55 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 12 months ago by larrylujack.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 10, 2008 at 11:56 AM #133653January 10, 2008 at 12:15 PM #133609drunkleParticipant
negative campaigning at the highest levels… npr being corrupted by bush appointees…
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/27/pageoneplus/27correx.html
edit:
the rumors of ron paul’s white supremecy links have been circulating for a while. why is npr now bringing it up? especially when everyone (msm) is trying to slag him off as a non candidate?
January 10, 2008 at 12:15 PM #133701drunkleParticipantnegative campaigning at the highest levels… npr being corrupted by bush appointees…
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/27/pageoneplus/27correx.html
edit:
the rumors of ron paul’s white supremecy links have been circulating for a while. why is npr now bringing it up? especially when everyone (msm) is trying to slag him off as a non candidate?
January 10, 2008 at 12:15 PM #133663drunkleParticipantnegative campaigning at the highest levels… npr being corrupted by bush appointees…
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/27/pageoneplus/27correx.html
edit:
the rumors of ron paul’s white supremecy links have been circulating for a while. why is npr now bringing it up? especially when everyone (msm) is trying to slag him off as a non candidate?
January 10, 2008 at 12:15 PM #133595drunkleParticipantnegative campaigning at the highest levels… npr being corrupted by bush appointees…
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/27/pageoneplus/27correx.html
edit:
the rumors of ron paul’s white supremecy links have been circulating for a while. why is npr now bringing it up? especially when everyone (msm) is trying to slag him off as a non candidate?
January 10, 2008 at 12:15 PM #133408drunkleParticipantnegative campaigning at the highest levels… npr being corrupted by bush appointees…
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/27/pageoneplus/27correx.html
edit:
the rumors of ron paul’s white supremecy links have been circulating for a while. why is npr now bringing it up? especially when everyone (msm) is trying to slag him off as a non candidate?
January 10, 2008 at 4:50 PM #133956CricketOnTheHearthParticipant“This simply shows that those districts that like romney and clinton are the same that have an electronic voter system rather than a paper method.”
I don’t understand… this seems to actually prove the poster’s point.
Rather suspicious, all right.
I am noticing massive institutional resistance to the grassroots-favored candidates on both the right and the left… neither Ron Paul, nor Gravel and Kucinich are getting any respect from the establishment, nor equal opportunity to go to the debates. Edwards is barely getting the time of day.
The “Ron Paul rEVOLution” banners strung up on the overpasses around town are an absolute hoot. I’ve never seen such grassroots activism on the Republican side; usually seems like R’s move in lockstep with their party’s leadership. Not this year.
>chirp<
January 10, 2008 at 4:50 PM #133662CricketOnTheHearthParticipant“This simply shows that those districts that like romney and clinton are the same that have an electronic voter system rather than a paper method.”
I don’t understand… this seems to actually prove the poster’s point.
Rather suspicious, all right.
I am noticing massive institutional resistance to the grassroots-favored candidates on both the right and the left… neither Ron Paul, nor Gravel and Kucinich are getting any respect from the establishment, nor equal opportunity to go to the debates. Edwards is barely getting the time of day.
The “Ron Paul rEVOLution” banners strung up on the overpasses around town are an absolute hoot. I’ve never seen such grassroots activism on the Republican side; usually seems like R’s move in lockstep with their party’s leadership. Not this year.
>chirp<
January 10, 2008 at 4:50 PM #133918CricketOnTheHearthParticipant“This simply shows that those districts that like romney and clinton are the same that have an electronic voter system rather than a paper method.”
I don’t understand… this seems to actually prove the poster’s point.
Rather suspicious, all right.
I am noticing massive institutional resistance to the grassroots-favored candidates on both the right and the left… neither Ron Paul, nor Gravel and Kucinich are getting any respect from the establishment, nor equal opportunity to go to the debates. Edwards is barely getting the time of day.
The “Ron Paul rEVOLution” banners strung up on the overpasses around town are an absolute hoot. I’ve never seen such grassroots activism on the Republican side; usually seems like R’s move in lockstep with their party’s leadership. Not this year.
>chirp<
January 10, 2008 at 4:50 PM #133865CricketOnTheHearthParticipant“This simply shows that those districts that like romney and clinton are the same that have an electronic voter system rather than a paper method.”
I don’t understand… this seems to actually prove the poster’s point.
Rather suspicious, all right.
I am noticing massive institutional resistance to the grassroots-favored candidates on both the right and the left… neither Ron Paul, nor Gravel and Kucinich are getting any respect from the establishment, nor equal opportunity to go to the debates. Edwards is barely getting the time of day.
The “Ron Paul rEVOLution” banners strung up on the overpasses around town are an absolute hoot. I’ve never seen such grassroots activism on the Republican side; usually seems like R’s move in lockstep with their party’s leadership. Not this year.
>chirp<
January 10, 2008 at 4:50 PM #133854CricketOnTheHearthParticipant“This simply shows that those districts that like romney and clinton are the same that have an electronic voter system rather than a paper method.”
I don’t understand… this seems to actually prove the poster’s point.
Rather suspicious, all right.
I am noticing massive institutional resistance to the grassroots-favored candidates on both the right and the left… neither Ron Paul, nor Gravel and Kucinich are getting any respect from the establishment, nor equal opportunity to go to the debates. Edwards is barely getting the time of day.
The “Ron Paul rEVOLution” banners strung up on the overpasses around town are an absolute hoot. I’ve never seen such grassroots activism on the Republican side; usually seems like R’s move in lockstep with their party’s leadership. Not this year.
>chirp<
January 10, 2008 at 5:39 PM #133924gold_dredger_phdParticipantThis is just typical corruption due to the dysfunctional two-party system in this country.
The presidential election in 1988 in Indiana had no option for voting for a third party candidate since some functionary in Indiana rigged it that way. He said that the election was about voters getting to select the “Democrat or Republican” of their choice.
There’s alot of corruption in this country and people just put their heads in the sand.
January 10, 2008 at 5:39 PM #133935gold_dredger_phdParticipantThis is just typical corruption due to the dysfunctional two-party system in this country.
The presidential election in 1988 in Indiana had no option for voting for a third party candidate since some functionary in Indiana rigged it that way. He said that the election was about voters getting to select the “Democrat or Republican” of their choice.
There’s alot of corruption in this country and people just put their heads in the sand.
January 10, 2008 at 5:39 PM #133732gold_dredger_phdParticipantThis is just typical corruption due to the dysfunctional two-party system in this country.
The presidential election in 1988 in Indiana had no option for voting for a third party candidate since some functionary in Indiana rigged it that way. He said that the election was about voters getting to select the “Democrat or Republican” of their choice.
There’s alot of corruption in this country and people just put their heads in the sand.
January 10, 2008 at 5:39 PM #133988gold_dredger_phdParticipantThis is just typical corruption due to the dysfunctional two-party system in this country.
The presidential election in 1988 in Indiana had no option for voting for a third party candidate since some functionary in Indiana rigged it that way. He said that the election was about voters getting to select the “Democrat or Republican” of their choice.
There’s alot of corruption in this country and people just put their heads in the sand.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.