- This topic has 180 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 5, 2009 at 9:28 AM #341702February 5, 2009 at 9:48 AM #341164DWCAPParticipant
[quote=barnaby33]Taxes must rise, employment must fall, all one or the other simply isn’t possible.
Josh[/quote]Why? What possible reason is there that we cant cut our way out of this? Companies and buisneess do it all the time. Some services will suffer, some may even end. If they were really that important, they will be picked up in the private sector for a fee. But I still dont see any reason why we couldnt cut our way out of this mess.
February 5, 2009 at 9:48 AM #341489DWCAPParticipant[quote=barnaby33]Taxes must rise, employment must fall, all one or the other simply isn’t possible.
Josh[/quote]Why? What possible reason is there that we cant cut our way out of this? Companies and buisneess do it all the time. Some services will suffer, some may even end. If they were really that important, they will be picked up in the private sector for a fee. But I still dont see any reason why we couldnt cut our way out of this mess.
February 5, 2009 at 9:48 AM #341591DWCAPParticipant[quote=barnaby33]Taxes must rise, employment must fall, all one or the other simply isn’t possible.
Josh[/quote]Why? What possible reason is there that we cant cut our way out of this? Companies and buisneess do it all the time. Some services will suffer, some may even end. If they were really that important, they will be picked up in the private sector for a fee. But I still dont see any reason why we couldnt cut our way out of this mess.
February 5, 2009 at 9:48 AM #341618DWCAPParticipant[quote=barnaby33]Taxes must rise, employment must fall, all one or the other simply isn’t possible.
Josh[/quote]Why? What possible reason is there that we cant cut our way out of this? Companies and buisneess do it all the time. Some services will suffer, some may even end. If they were really that important, they will be picked up in the private sector for a fee. But I still dont see any reason why we couldnt cut our way out of this mess.
February 5, 2009 at 9:48 AM #341712DWCAPParticipant[quote=barnaby33]Taxes must rise, employment must fall, all one or the other simply isn’t possible.
Josh[/quote]Why? What possible reason is there that we cant cut our way out of this? Companies and buisneess do it all the time. Some services will suffer, some may even end. If they were really that important, they will be picked up in the private sector for a fee. But I still dont see any reason why we couldnt cut our way out of this mess.
February 5, 2009 at 10:04 AM #341169fredo4ParticipantI have no problem paying taxes for programs that actually work and are run properly, but how often is that the case with the public sector? One of the best examples is our public schools. No matter how much money we dump into them, the test scores just go further and further down.
The reason for this is because the majority of families who send their kids to public schools don’t value education. If they did, they’d make sure their kids could read and do math.
I’ll tell you a public program that I’d support whole heartedly and that is cutting the amount of school administrators in half and putting that money towards trade programs (plumbing, mechanics, electricians, computer skills).
Unfortunately this will never happen. The teachers’ union thrives on poor test scores. That way they can blame it on a lack of funding and collect more and more money each year.
SD realtor is completely right about the fact that the unions have a complete stranglehold on California. It’s very sad and frustrating.
February 5, 2009 at 10:04 AM #341494fredo4ParticipantI have no problem paying taxes for programs that actually work and are run properly, but how often is that the case with the public sector? One of the best examples is our public schools. No matter how much money we dump into them, the test scores just go further and further down.
The reason for this is because the majority of families who send their kids to public schools don’t value education. If they did, they’d make sure their kids could read and do math.
I’ll tell you a public program that I’d support whole heartedly and that is cutting the amount of school administrators in half and putting that money towards trade programs (plumbing, mechanics, electricians, computer skills).
Unfortunately this will never happen. The teachers’ union thrives on poor test scores. That way they can blame it on a lack of funding and collect more and more money each year.
SD realtor is completely right about the fact that the unions have a complete stranglehold on California. It’s very sad and frustrating.
February 5, 2009 at 10:04 AM #341596fredo4ParticipantI have no problem paying taxes for programs that actually work and are run properly, but how often is that the case with the public sector? One of the best examples is our public schools. No matter how much money we dump into them, the test scores just go further and further down.
The reason for this is because the majority of families who send their kids to public schools don’t value education. If they did, they’d make sure their kids could read and do math.
I’ll tell you a public program that I’d support whole heartedly and that is cutting the amount of school administrators in half and putting that money towards trade programs (plumbing, mechanics, electricians, computer skills).
Unfortunately this will never happen. The teachers’ union thrives on poor test scores. That way they can blame it on a lack of funding and collect more and more money each year.
SD realtor is completely right about the fact that the unions have a complete stranglehold on California. It’s very sad and frustrating.
February 5, 2009 at 10:04 AM #341623fredo4ParticipantI have no problem paying taxes for programs that actually work and are run properly, but how often is that the case with the public sector? One of the best examples is our public schools. No matter how much money we dump into them, the test scores just go further and further down.
The reason for this is because the majority of families who send their kids to public schools don’t value education. If they did, they’d make sure their kids could read and do math.
I’ll tell you a public program that I’d support whole heartedly and that is cutting the amount of school administrators in half and putting that money towards trade programs (plumbing, mechanics, electricians, computer skills).
Unfortunately this will never happen. The teachers’ union thrives on poor test scores. That way they can blame it on a lack of funding and collect more and more money each year.
SD realtor is completely right about the fact that the unions have a complete stranglehold on California. It’s very sad and frustrating.
February 5, 2009 at 10:04 AM #341717fredo4ParticipantI have no problem paying taxes for programs that actually work and are run properly, but how often is that the case with the public sector? One of the best examples is our public schools. No matter how much money we dump into them, the test scores just go further and further down.
The reason for this is because the majority of families who send their kids to public schools don’t value education. If they did, they’d make sure their kids could read and do math.
I’ll tell you a public program that I’d support whole heartedly and that is cutting the amount of school administrators in half and putting that money towards trade programs (plumbing, mechanics, electricians, computer skills).
Unfortunately this will never happen. The teachers’ union thrives on poor test scores. That way they can blame it on a lack of funding and collect more and more money each year.
SD realtor is completely right about the fact that the unions have a complete stranglehold on California. It’s very sad and frustrating.
February 5, 2009 at 10:06 AM #341179crParticipantIt’s okay when Democrats want to raise taxes, but not Republicans. At least KFI isn’t biased.
Politicians should not be allowed to make more money than the average income of the state that pays their salary.
Problem solved.
February 5, 2009 at 10:06 AM #341504crParticipantIt’s okay when Democrats want to raise taxes, but not Republicans. At least KFI isn’t biased.
Politicians should not be allowed to make more money than the average income of the state that pays their salary.
Problem solved.
February 5, 2009 at 10:06 AM #341605crParticipantIt’s okay when Democrats want to raise taxes, but not Republicans. At least KFI isn’t biased.
Politicians should not be allowed to make more money than the average income of the state that pays their salary.
Problem solved.
February 5, 2009 at 10:06 AM #341633crParticipantIt’s okay when Democrats want to raise taxes, but not Republicans. At least KFI isn’t biased.
Politicians should not be allowed to make more money than the average income of the state that pays their salary.
Problem solved.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.