- This topic has 500 replies, 40 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 3 months ago by ucodegen.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 1, 2010 at 10:36 PM #559301June 1, 2010 at 11:56 PM #558330OxfordParticipant
[quote=NewtoSanDiego]No way in hell am I giving up my dog! I am an American citizen and I have a right to own what ever dog I want.
You liberal, nanny state proponents….whine, whine, whine. I have my rights.
I’m gonna have to take my dog for walks around your house. Go ahead stop me. I am a free to do this, it is not illegal[/quote]
Response 137 to the statement: “You just might be a redneck if you post the following on internet forums”.
OX
…make that dumbassJune 1, 2010 at 11:56 PM #558432OxfordParticipant[quote=NewtoSanDiego]No way in hell am I giving up my dog! I am an American citizen and I have a right to own what ever dog I want.
You liberal, nanny state proponents….whine, whine, whine. I have my rights.
I’m gonna have to take my dog for walks around your house. Go ahead stop me. I am a free to do this, it is not illegal[/quote]
Response 137 to the statement: “You just might be a redneck if you post the following on internet forums”.
OX
…make that dumbassJune 1, 2010 at 11:56 PM #558926OxfordParticipant[quote=NewtoSanDiego]No way in hell am I giving up my dog! I am an American citizen and I have a right to own what ever dog I want.
You liberal, nanny state proponents….whine, whine, whine. I have my rights.
I’m gonna have to take my dog for walks around your house. Go ahead stop me. I am a free to do this, it is not illegal[/quote]
Response 137 to the statement: “You just might be a redneck if you post the following on internet forums”.
OX
…make that dumbassJune 1, 2010 at 11:56 PM #559027OxfordParticipant[quote=NewtoSanDiego]No way in hell am I giving up my dog! I am an American citizen and I have a right to own what ever dog I want.
You liberal, nanny state proponents….whine, whine, whine. I have my rights.
I’m gonna have to take my dog for walks around your house. Go ahead stop me. I am a free to do this, it is not illegal[/quote]
Response 137 to the statement: “You just might be a redneck if you post the following on internet forums”.
OX
…make that dumbassJune 1, 2010 at 11:56 PM #559311OxfordParticipant[quote=NewtoSanDiego]No way in hell am I giving up my dog! I am an American citizen and I have a right to own what ever dog I want.
You liberal, nanny state proponents….whine, whine, whine. I have my rights.
I’m gonna have to take my dog for walks around your house. Go ahead stop me. I am a free to do this, it is not illegal[/quote]
Response 137 to the statement: “You just might be a redneck if you post the following on internet forums”.
OX
…make that dumbassJune 2, 2010 at 6:48 AM #558370scaredyclassicParticipanti did used to live across the street from a crazy dog lady who had 2 or maybe 3 wolf hybrids in her yard. they were alarming. wolf hybrids. jeepers. almost as scary as training a dog to attack a bull or bear.
June 2, 2010 at 6:48 AM #558472scaredyclassicParticipanti did used to live across the street from a crazy dog lady who had 2 or maybe 3 wolf hybrids in her yard. they were alarming. wolf hybrids. jeepers. almost as scary as training a dog to attack a bull or bear.
June 2, 2010 at 6:48 AM #558966scaredyclassicParticipanti did used to live across the street from a crazy dog lady who had 2 or maybe 3 wolf hybrids in her yard. they were alarming. wolf hybrids. jeepers. almost as scary as training a dog to attack a bull or bear.
June 2, 2010 at 6:48 AM #559067scaredyclassicParticipanti did used to live across the street from a crazy dog lady who had 2 or maybe 3 wolf hybrids in her yard. they were alarming. wolf hybrids. jeepers. almost as scary as training a dog to attack a bull or bear.
June 2, 2010 at 6:48 AM #559351scaredyclassicParticipanti did used to live across the street from a crazy dog lady who had 2 or maybe 3 wolf hybrids in her yard. they were alarming. wolf hybrids. jeepers. almost as scary as training a dog to attack a bull or bear.
June 3, 2010 at 10:52 AM #559080nattyParticipantsigh….have read the board going on many years. never felt the urge to post until now.
dogsbite.org- fear mongering to perpetuate nonsense. no factual based information, not interested in promoting some attempt at ‘rational’ discussion.
Dog Bite studies to date hold little-to-no relevance. Scanning classified ads, ‘news’ reports and websites does not constitute as a study. The number of four-legged canines which reside in the USA is unknown, although of course they are estimates. DNA testing is no where near 100% accurate. The nearly unimaginable number of unregulated breeding and inbreeding presents a muddled picture of ungatherable data. Many other factors too long to list as why dog bite statistics are bunk.
Aggression is a behavior. Behavior is learned. Behavior is a response to outside stimuli. No human or canine is born to kill. No human or canine is bred to kill. The idea a ‘pit bull’ is alien to such concrete evidence and data, is absurd. Those who believe such nonsense, should take a hard look in the mirror. Breeding for a predisposition does not guarantee behavior, i.e. a male and female human are tenacious business people, so they breed to pop out offspring who run fortune 500 companies.
Now
Canines inflicting damage upon humans and fellow canines, is an insolvable event as whole. Again, behavior IS learned. But just as human miscreants will roam the earth no matter the learning and government legislation, even ‘properly’ raised and cared for animals-human included-have within them the ability to act, even for an instance, outside of their given temperament inexplicably. In other problematic events the human/canine relationship is a beautiful marriage that is either not taken seriously or the given individual doesn’t have the capability to understand and act accordingly. In both instances, law will change nothing, each fall under unpreventable human error.
SO in short, the original poster is responsible for following animal control laws, and if not, such as allowing a puppy to run public streets free where not permissible, then should an event take place, the owner will deal with issues–legal, stares– accordingly.
June 3, 2010 at 10:52 AM #559183nattyParticipantsigh….have read the board going on many years. never felt the urge to post until now.
dogsbite.org- fear mongering to perpetuate nonsense. no factual based information, not interested in promoting some attempt at ‘rational’ discussion.
Dog Bite studies to date hold little-to-no relevance. Scanning classified ads, ‘news’ reports and websites does not constitute as a study. The number of four-legged canines which reside in the USA is unknown, although of course they are estimates. DNA testing is no where near 100% accurate. The nearly unimaginable number of unregulated breeding and inbreeding presents a muddled picture of ungatherable data. Many other factors too long to list as why dog bite statistics are bunk.
Aggression is a behavior. Behavior is learned. Behavior is a response to outside stimuli. No human or canine is born to kill. No human or canine is bred to kill. The idea a ‘pit bull’ is alien to such concrete evidence and data, is absurd. Those who believe such nonsense, should take a hard look in the mirror. Breeding for a predisposition does not guarantee behavior, i.e. a male and female human are tenacious business people, so they breed to pop out offspring who run fortune 500 companies.
Now
Canines inflicting damage upon humans and fellow canines, is an insolvable event as whole. Again, behavior IS learned. But just as human miscreants will roam the earth no matter the learning and government legislation, even ‘properly’ raised and cared for animals-human included-have within them the ability to act, even for an instance, outside of their given temperament inexplicably. In other problematic events the human/canine relationship is a beautiful marriage that is either not taken seriously or the given individual doesn’t have the capability to understand and act accordingly. In both instances, law will change nothing, each fall under unpreventable human error.
SO in short, the original poster is responsible for following animal control laws, and if not, such as allowing a puppy to run public streets free where not permissible, then should an event take place, the owner will deal with issues–legal, stares– accordingly.
June 3, 2010 at 10:52 AM #559681nattyParticipantsigh….have read the board going on many years. never felt the urge to post until now.
dogsbite.org- fear mongering to perpetuate nonsense. no factual based information, not interested in promoting some attempt at ‘rational’ discussion.
Dog Bite studies to date hold little-to-no relevance. Scanning classified ads, ‘news’ reports and websites does not constitute as a study. The number of four-legged canines which reside in the USA is unknown, although of course they are estimates. DNA testing is no where near 100% accurate. The nearly unimaginable number of unregulated breeding and inbreeding presents a muddled picture of ungatherable data. Many other factors too long to list as why dog bite statistics are bunk.
Aggression is a behavior. Behavior is learned. Behavior is a response to outside stimuli. No human or canine is born to kill. No human or canine is bred to kill. The idea a ‘pit bull’ is alien to such concrete evidence and data, is absurd. Those who believe such nonsense, should take a hard look in the mirror. Breeding for a predisposition does not guarantee behavior, i.e. a male and female human are tenacious business people, so they breed to pop out offspring who run fortune 500 companies.
Now
Canines inflicting damage upon humans and fellow canines, is an insolvable event as whole. Again, behavior IS learned. But just as human miscreants will roam the earth no matter the learning and government legislation, even ‘properly’ raised and cared for animals-human included-have within them the ability to act, even for an instance, outside of their given temperament inexplicably. In other problematic events the human/canine relationship is a beautiful marriage that is either not taken seriously or the given individual doesn’t have the capability to understand and act accordingly. In both instances, law will change nothing, each fall under unpreventable human error.
SO in short, the original poster is responsible for following animal control laws, and if not, such as allowing a puppy to run public streets free where not permissible, then should an event take place, the owner will deal with issues–legal, stares– accordingly.
June 3, 2010 at 10:52 AM #559783nattyParticipantsigh….have read the board going on many years. never felt the urge to post until now.
dogsbite.org- fear mongering to perpetuate nonsense. no factual based information, not interested in promoting some attempt at ‘rational’ discussion.
Dog Bite studies to date hold little-to-no relevance. Scanning classified ads, ‘news’ reports and websites does not constitute as a study. The number of four-legged canines which reside in the USA is unknown, although of course they are estimates. DNA testing is no where near 100% accurate. The nearly unimaginable number of unregulated breeding and inbreeding presents a muddled picture of ungatherable data. Many other factors too long to list as why dog bite statistics are bunk.
Aggression is a behavior. Behavior is learned. Behavior is a response to outside stimuli. No human or canine is born to kill. No human or canine is bred to kill. The idea a ‘pit bull’ is alien to such concrete evidence and data, is absurd. Those who believe such nonsense, should take a hard look in the mirror. Breeding for a predisposition does not guarantee behavior, i.e. a male and female human are tenacious business people, so they breed to pop out offspring who run fortune 500 companies.
Now
Canines inflicting damage upon humans and fellow canines, is an insolvable event as whole. Again, behavior IS learned. But just as human miscreants will roam the earth no matter the learning and government legislation, even ‘properly’ raised and cared for animals-human included-have within them the ability to act, even for an instance, outside of their given temperament inexplicably. In other problematic events the human/canine relationship is a beautiful marriage that is either not taken seriously or the given individual doesn’t have the capability to understand and act accordingly. In both instances, law will change nothing, each fall under unpreventable human error.
SO in short, the original poster is responsible for following animal control laws, and if not, such as allowing a puppy to run public streets free where not permissible, then should an event take place, the owner will deal with issues–legal, stares– accordingly.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.