Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › nationwide foreclosure moratorium!
- This topic has 215 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 2 months ago by carlsbadworker.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 8, 2010 at 11:06 AM #615848October 8, 2010 at 11:21 AM #614786daveljParticipant
[quote=dbapig][quote=davelj][quote=flu]http://finance.yahoo.com/news/BofA-halts-foreclosure-sales-apf-977158216.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=3&asset=&ccode=
lol…Senator dodd’s quote:
“American families should not have to worry about losing their homes to sloppy bureaucratic mismanagement or fraud,” Dodd said. [/quote]
“Their homes”? THEIR homes?! That is rich. These are not THEIR homes – they’re the LENDERS’ homes! A home becomes YOUR home after you’ve paid off the mortgage. Until then, the lender is the senior partner in the arrangement and gets to choose what happens when you break the contract and stop paying. And this clown is on the Senate Banking Committee… no wonder we’re in such deep shit.
Now clearly the servicers haven’t handled this process well at all. And they deserve to lose their asses. But please. THEIR homes? That makes me ill.[/quote]
If you stretch that a bit, US isn’t our nation but other nationss that hold our debt… Just saying…[/quote]
That is incorrect. US Government Bills, Notes and Bonds are unsecured (aside from the “full faith and credit” of the US Government – which is not tangible). A mortgage is a secured debt collateralized by a tangible asset (property).
I would refer to the nations that hold our debt as subordinated stakeholders. But not owners.
October 8, 2010 at 11:21 AM #614869daveljParticipant[quote=dbapig][quote=davelj][quote=flu]http://finance.yahoo.com/news/BofA-halts-foreclosure-sales-apf-977158216.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=3&asset=&ccode=
lol…Senator dodd’s quote:
“American families should not have to worry about losing their homes to sloppy bureaucratic mismanagement or fraud,” Dodd said. [/quote]
“Their homes”? THEIR homes?! That is rich. These are not THEIR homes – they’re the LENDERS’ homes! A home becomes YOUR home after you’ve paid off the mortgage. Until then, the lender is the senior partner in the arrangement and gets to choose what happens when you break the contract and stop paying. And this clown is on the Senate Banking Committee… no wonder we’re in such deep shit.
Now clearly the servicers haven’t handled this process well at all. And they deserve to lose their asses. But please. THEIR homes? That makes me ill.[/quote]
If you stretch that a bit, US isn’t our nation but other nationss that hold our debt… Just saying…[/quote]
That is incorrect. US Government Bills, Notes and Bonds are unsecured (aside from the “full faith and credit” of the US Government – which is not tangible). A mortgage is a secured debt collateralized by a tangible asset (property).
I would refer to the nations that hold our debt as subordinated stakeholders. But not owners.
October 8, 2010 at 11:21 AM #615420daveljParticipant[quote=dbapig][quote=davelj][quote=flu]http://finance.yahoo.com/news/BofA-halts-foreclosure-sales-apf-977158216.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=3&asset=&ccode=
lol…Senator dodd’s quote:
“American families should not have to worry about losing their homes to sloppy bureaucratic mismanagement or fraud,” Dodd said. [/quote]
“Their homes”? THEIR homes?! That is rich. These are not THEIR homes – they’re the LENDERS’ homes! A home becomes YOUR home after you’ve paid off the mortgage. Until then, the lender is the senior partner in the arrangement and gets to choose what happens when you break the contract and stop paying. And this clown is on the Senate Banking Committee… no wonder we’re in such deep shit.
Now clearly the servicers haven’t handled this process well at all. And they deserve to lose their asses. But please. THEIR homes? That makes me ill.[/quote]
If you stretch that a bit, US isn’t our nation but other nationss that hold our debt… Just saying…[/quote]
That is incorrect. US Government Bills, Notes and Bonds are unsecured (aside from the “full faith and credit” of the US Government – which is not tangible). A mortgage is a secured debt collateralized by a tangible asset (property).
I would refer to the nations that hold our debt as subordinated stakeholders. But not owners.
October 8, 2010 at 11:21 AM #615537daveljParticipant[quote=dbapig][quote=davelj][quote=flu]http://finance.yahoo.com/news/BofA-halts-foreclosure-sales-apf-977158216.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=3&asset=&ccode=
lol…Senator dodd’s quote:
“American families should not have to worry about losing their homes to sloppy bureaucratic mismanagement or fraud,” Dodd said. [/quote]
“Their homes”? THEIR homes?! That is rich. These are not THEIR homes – they’re the LENDERS’ homes! A home becomes YOUR home after you’ve paid off the mortgage. Until then, the lender is the senior partner in the arrangement and gets to choose what happens when you break the contract and stop paying. And this clown is on the Senate Banking Committee… no wonder we’re in such deep shit.
Now clearly the servicers haven’t handled this process well at all. And they deserve to lose their asses. But please. THEIR homes? That makes me ill.[/quote]
If you stretch that a bit, US isn’t our nation but other nationss that hold our debt… Just saying…[/quote]
That is incorrect. US Government Bills, Notes and Bonds are unsecured (aside from the “full faith and credit” of the US Government – which is not tangible). A mortgage is a secured debt collateralized by a tangible asset (property).
I would refer to the nations that hold our debt as subordinated stakeholders. But not owners.
October 8, 2010 at 11:21 AM #615853daveljParticipant[quote=dbapig][quote=davelj][quote=flu]http://finance.yahoo.com/news/BofA-halts-foreclosure-sales-apf-977158216.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=3&asset=&ccode=
lol…Senator dodd’s quote:
“American families should not have to worry about losing their homes to sloppy bureaucratic mismanagement or fraud,” Dodd said. [/quote]
“Their homes”? THEIR homes?! That is rich. These are not THEIR homes – they’re the LENDERS’ homes! A home becomes YOUR home after you’ve paid off the mortgage. Until then, the lender is the senior partner in the arrangement and gets to choose what happens when you break the contract and stop paying. And this clown is on the Senate Banking Committee… no wonder we’re in such deep shit.
Now clearly the servicers haven’t handled this process well at all. And they deserve to lose their asses. But please. THEIR homes? That makes me ill.[/quote]
If you stretch that a bit, US isn’t our nation but other nationss that hold our debt… Just saying…[/quote]
That is incorrect. US Government Bills, Notes and Bonds are unsecured (aside from the “full faith and credit” of the US Government – which is not tangible). A mortgage is a secured debt collateralized by a tangible asset (property).
I would refer to the nations that hold our debt as subordinated stakeholders. But not owners.
October 8, 2010 at 12:10 PM #614821jpinpbParticipant[quote=davelj]
“Their homes”? THEIR homes?! That is rich. These are not THEIR homes – they’re the LENDERS’ homes! …… THEIR homes? That makes me ill.[/quote]Good point!!! If it’s their home, then no charges should be filed against the cop for destroying the house.
October 8, 2010 at 12:10 PM #614904jpinpbParticipant[quote=davelj]
“Their homes”? THEIR homes?! That is rich. These are not THEIR homes – they’re the LENDERS’ homes! …… THEIR homes? That makes me ill.[/quote]Good point!!! If it’s their home, then no charges should be filed against the cop for destroying the house.
October 8, 2010 at 12:10 PM #615455jpinpbParticipant[quote=davelj]
“Their homes”? THEIR homes?! That is rich. These are not THEIR homes – they’re the LENDERS’ homes! …… THEIR homes? That makes me ill.[/quote]Good point!!! If it’s their home, then no charges should be filed against the cop for destroying the house.
October 8, 2010 at 12:10 PM #615572jpinpbParticipant[quote=davelj]
“Their homes”? THEIR homes?! That is rich. These are not THEIR homes – they’re the LENDERS’ homes! …… THEIR homes? That makes me ill.[/quote]Good point!!! If it’s their home, then no charges should be filed against the cop for destroying the house.
October 8, 2010 at 12:10 PM #615888jpinpbParticipant[quote=davelj]
“Their homes”? THEIR homes?! That is rich. These are not THEIR homes – they’re the LENDERS’ homes! …… THEIR homes? That makes me ill.[/quote]Good point!!! If it’s their home, then no charges should be filed against the cop for destroying the house.
October 8, 2010 at 12:31 PM #614826briansd1GuestLet’s look at it another way.
As Binyamin Appelbaum of the NY Times said, the banks have from the beginning insisted on the letter of the law — they can continue to pay huge bonuses because employment contracts are binding.
Now, homeowners are saying that there is a legal process for foreclosing on collateral. The banks should follow the procedures and produce the documents to prove that they have the right to the collateral.
Is that too much to ask?
October 8, 2010 at 12:31 PM #614909briansd1GuestLet’s look at it another way.
As Binyamin Appelbaum of the NY Times said, the banks have from the beginning insisted on the letter of the law — they can continue to pay huge bonuses because employment contracts are binding.
Now, homeowners are saying that there is a legal process for foreclosing on collateral. The banks should follow the procedures and produce the documents to prove that they have the right to the collateral.
Is that too much to ask?
October 8, 2010 at 12:31 PM #615460briansd1GuestLet’s look at it another way.
As Binyamin Appelbaum of the NY Times said, the banks have from the beginning insisted on the letter of the law — they can continue to pay huge bonuses because employment contracts are binding.
Now, homeowners are saying that there is a legal process for foreclosing on collateral. The banks should follow the procedures and produce the documents to prove that they have the right to the collateral.
Is that too much to ask?
October 8, 2010 at 12:31 PM #615577briansd1GuestLet’s look at it another way.
As Binyamin Appelbaum of the NY Times said, the banks have from the beginning insisted on the letter of the law — they can continue to pay huge bonuses because employment contracts are binding.
Now, homeowners are saying that there is a legal process for foreclosing on collateral. The banks should follow the procedures and produce the documents to prove that they have the right to the collateral.
Is that too much to ask?
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.