Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › My Personal Credit Crisis
- This topic has 415 replies, 38 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by Allan from Fallbrook.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 14, 2009 at 6:50 PM #399807May 14, 2009 at 6:54 PM #399121daveljParticipant
This is disturbing – although not that surprising given the times we live in – on two levels (well, more than two, but two BIG levels):
(1) This guy is probably far more financially literate than the average home buyer over the last five years (with all that implies), and more importantly,
(2) His job is to understand finance and yet he has no problem whatsoever – no sense of shame or embarrassment at all – in sharing his story of idiocy with the world. Yeah, I know he’s hawking his book and will make some money from this, but… in days of yore his story would have been so unusual, bizarre and shameful, that he would do anything to hide its reality. Instead, it’s so commonplace, that he clearly feels that there will be no reputational damage whatsoever (that is, folks won’t scratch their heads reading future stories saying, “Why should I read this guy’s stories – he’s a financial idiot”).
(2) is by far the more disturbing element of this story. Shame is dead.
May 14, 2009 at 6:54 PM #399372daveljParticipantThis is disturbing – although not that surprising given the times we live in – on two levels (well, more than two, but two BIG levels):
(1) This guy is probably far more financially literate than the average home buyer over the last five years (with all that implies), and more importantly,
(2) His job is to understand finance and yet he has no problem whatsoever – no sense of shame or embarrassment at all – in sharing his story of idiocy with the world. Yeah, I know he’s hawking his book and will make some money from this, but… in days of yore his story would have been so unusual, bizarre and shameful, that he would do anything to hide its reality. Instead, it’s so commonplace, that he clearly feels that there will be no reputational damage whatsoever (that is, folks won’t scratch their heads reading future stories saying, “Why should I read this guy’s stories – he’s a financial idiot”).
(2) is by far the more disturbing element of this story. Shame is dead.
May 14, 2009 at 6:54 PM #399605daveljParticipantThis is disturbing – although not that surprising given the times we live in – on two levels (well, more than two, but two BIG levels):
(1) This guy is probably far more financially literate than the average home buyer over the last five years (with all that implies), and more importantly,
(2) His job is to understand finance and yet he has no problem whatsoever – no sense of shame or embarrassment at all – in sharing his story of idiocy with the world. Yeah, I know he’s hawking his book and will make some money from this, but… in days of yore his story would have been so unusual, bizarre and shameful, that he would do anything to hide its reality. Instead, it’s so commonplace, that he clearly feels that there will be no reputational damage whatsoever (that is, folks won’t scratch their heads reading future stories saying, “Why should I read this guy’s stories – he’s a financial idiot”).
(2) is by far the more disturbing element of this story. Shame is dead.
May 14, 2009 at 6:54 PM #399661daveljParticipantThis is disturbing – although not that surprising given the times we live in – on two levels (well, more than two, but two BIG levels):
(1) This guy is probably far more financially literate than the average home buyer over the last five years (with all that implies), and more importantly,
(2) His job is to understand finance and yet he has no problem whatsoever – no sense of shame or embarrassment at all – in sharing his story of idiocy with the world. Yeah, I know he’s hawking his book and will make some money from this, but… in days of yore his story would have been so unusual, bizarre and shameful, that he would do anything to hide its reality. Instead, it’s so commonplace, that he clearly feels that there will be no reputational damage whatsoever (that is, folks won’t scratch their heads reading future stories saying, “Why should I read this guy’s stories – he’s a financial idiot”).
(2) is by far the more disturbing element of this story. Shame is dead.
May 14, 2009 at 6:54 PM #399812daveljParticipantThis is disturbing – although not that surprising given the times we live in – on two levels (well, more than two, but two BIG levels):
(1) This guy is probably far more financially literate than the average home buyer over the last five years (with all that implies), and more importantly,
(2) His job is to understand finance and yet he has no problem whatsoever – no sense of shame or embarrassment at all – in sharing his story of idiocy with the world. Yeah, I know he’s hawking his book and will make some money from this, but… in days of yore his story would have been so unusual, bizarre and shameful, that he would do anything to hide its reality. Instead, it’s so commonplace, that he clearly feels that there will be no reputational damage whatsoever (that is, folks won’t scratch their heads reading future stories saying, “Why should I read this guy’s stories – he’s a financial idiot”).
(2) is by far the more disturbing element of this story. Shame is dead.
May 14, 2009 at 7:01 PM #399131JACKQLYNParticipantWow…
May 14, 2009 at 7:01 PM #399382JACKQLYNParticipantWow…
May 14, 2009 at 7:01 PM #399614JACKQLYNParticipantWow…
May 14, 2009 at 7:01 PM #399671JACKQLYNParticipantWow…
May 14, 2009 at 7:01 PM #399822JACKQLYNParticipantWow…
May 14, 2009 at 7:09 PM #399136patientrenterParticipantShame is dead. Indeed. When choices had to be made on how to manage through this latest recession, moral hazard was weighed against pain avoidance. Remember when moral hazard was a live issue? That’s long gone. Everyone decided we needed to “save our economy”, aka “hit the restart button”. This is what happens when you make that choice.
May 14, 2009 at 7:09 PM #399387patientrenterParticipantShame is dead. Indeed. When choices had to be made on how to manage through this latest recession, moral hazard was weighed against pain avoidance. Remember when moral hazard was a live issue? That’s long gone. Everyone decided we needed to “save our economy”, aka “hit the restart button”. This is what happens when you make that choice.
May 14, 2009 at 7:09 PM #399619patientrenterParticipantShame is dead. Indeed. When choices had to be made on how to manage through this latest recession, moral hazard was weighed against pain avoidance. Remember when moral hazard was a live issue? That’s long gone. Everyone decided we needed to “save our economy”, aka “hit the restart button”. This is what happens when you make that choice.
May 14, 2009 at 7:09 PM #399676patientrenterParticipantShame is dead. Indeed. When choices had to be made on how to manage through this latest recession, moral hazard was weighed against pain avoidance. Remember when moral hazard was a live issue? That’s long gone. Everyone decided we needed to “save our economy”, aka “hit the restart button”. This is what happens when you make that choice.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.