- This topic has 240 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 5 months ago by outtamojo.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 28, 2010 at 12:34 PM #507412January 28, 2010 at 12:45 PM #506513Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipant
Once you get above 3 floors, it starts to get real expensive per sqf from my understanding. then there is parking, but maybe that would be where car share comes in.
I would add that at first the metro link in L.A. had low ridership but it is nearly always at full capacity now days, some times when they shut the freeway or it snows, they have to turn people away.
January 28, 2010 at 12:45 PM #506659Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipantOnce you get above 3 floors, it starts to get real expensive per sqf from my understanding. then there is parking, but maybe that would be where car share comes in.
I would add that at first the metro link in L.A. had low ridership but it is nearly always at full capacity now days, some times when they shut the freeway or it snows, they have to turn people away.
January 28, 2010 at 12:45 PM #507068Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipantOnce you get above 3 floors, it starts to get real expensive per sqf from my understanding. then there is parking, but maybe that would be where car share comes in.
I would add that at first the metro link in L.A. had low ridership but it is nearly always at full capacity now days, some times when they shut the freeway or it snows, they have to turn people away.
January 28, 2010 at 12:45 PM #507163Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipantOnce you get above 3 floors, it starts to get real expensive per sqf from my understanding. then there is parking, but maybe that would be where car share comes in.
I would add that at first the metro link in L.A. had low ridership but it is nearly always at full capacity now days, some times when they shut the freeway or it snows, they have to turn people away.
January 28, 2010 at 12:45 PM #507417Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipantOnce you get above 3 floors, it starts to get real expensive per sqf from my understanding. then there is parking, but maybe that would be where car share comes in.
I would add that at first the metro link in L.A. had low ridership but it is nearly always at full capacity now days, some times when they shut the freeway or it snows, they have to turn people away.
January 28, 2010 at 12:50 PM #506518ucodegenParticipant3) The number of people who die annually on our roads is something like 50k, and the number injured is significantly higher. Self driven cars should have no collisions.
You are an optimist.. think blue screen of death. How about ‘runaway Toyota’s too. Its not supposed to happen, but still does. It needs to be realized that following distances will be decreased and speeds increased for cars that are ‘auto-piloted’ because the perception of increased safety.
January 28, 2010 at 12:50 PM #506664ucodegenParticipant3) The number of people who die annually on our roads is something like 50k, and the number injured is significantly higher. Self driven cars should have no collisions.
You are an optimist.. think blue screen of death. How about ‘runaway Toyota’s too. Its not supposed to happen, but still does. It needs to be realized that following distances will be decreased and speeds increased for cars that are ‘auto-piloted’ because the perception of increased safety.
January 28, 2010 at 12:50 PM #507073ucodegenParticipant3) The number of people who die annually on our roads is something like 50k, and the number injured is significantly higher. Self driven cars should have no collisions.
You are an optimist.. think blue screen of death. How about ‘runaway Toyota’s too. Its not supposed to happen, but still does. It needs to be realized that following distances will be decreased and speeds increased for cars that are ‘auto-piloted’ because the perception of increased safety.
January 28, 2010 at 12:50 PM #507168ucodegenParticipant3) The number of people who die annually on our roads is something like 50k, and the number injured is significantly higher. Self driven cars should have no collisions.
You are an optimist.. think blue screen of death. How about ‘runaway Toyota’s too. Its not supposed to happen, but still does. It needs to be realized that following distances will be decreased and speeds increased for cars that are ‘auto-piloted’ because the perception of increased safety.
January 28, 2010 at 12:50 PM #507422ucodegenParticipant3) The number of people who die annually on our roads is something like 50k, and the number injured is significantly higher. Self driven cars should have no collisions.
You are an optimist.. think blue screen of death. How about ‘runaway Toyota’s too. Its not supposed to happen, but still does. It needs to be realized that following distances will be decreased and speeds increased for cars that are ‘auto-piloted’ because the perception of increased safety.
January 28, 2010 at 12:53 PM #506523Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipantI would also add that on the other coast (East), their trains have high ridership numbers for most suburbs connected to the bigger cities, so I don’t buy that everyone needs to live in the city.
Also look at Japan, their High speed rail is always packed as well.
I work with customers in Japan and they are always telling me they need to leave to catch the high speed rail to their town (usually about 100 miles or so outside Tokyo)
January 28, 2010 at 12:53 PM #506669Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipantI would also add that on the other coast (East), their trains have high ridership numbers for most suburbs connected to the bigger cities, so I don’t buy that everyone needs to live in the city.
Also look at Japan, their High speed rail is always packed as well.
I work with customers in Japan and they are always telling me they need to leave to catch the high speed rail to their town (usually about 100 miles or so outside Tokyo)
January 28, 2010 at 12:53 PM #507078Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipantI would also add that on the other coast (East), their trains have high ridership numbers for most suburbs connected to the bigger cities, so I don’t buy that everyone needs to live in the city.
Also look at Japan, their High speed rail is always packed as well.
I work with customers in Japan and they are always telling me they need to leave to catch the high speed rail to their town (usually about 100 miles or so outside Tokyo)
January 28, 2010 at 12:53 PM #507173Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipantI would also add that on the other coast (East), their trains have high ridership numbers for most suburbs connected to the bigger cities, so I don’t buy that everyone needs to live in the city.
Also look at Japan, their High speed rail is always packed as well.
I work with customers in Japan and they are always telling me they need to leave to catch the high speed rail to their town (usually about 100 miles or so outside Tokyo)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.