- This topic has 39 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 3 months ago by one_muggle.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 8, 2007 at 10:04 AM #71757August 8, 2007 at 10:17 AM #71766HereWeGoParticipant
San Diego County update from sddt.com:
NOTs fell to 686 in July, but that’s still the second highest level since 1982 (June’s 738 is the current record.) Maybe lenders are initiating loss mitigation a bit earlier?
NODs broke through the 2000 threshold.
August 8, 2007 at 10:17 AM #71883HereWeGoParticipantSan Diego County update from sddt.com:
NOTs fell to 686 in July, but that’s still the second highest level since 1982 (June’s 738 is the current record.) Maybe lenders are initiating loss mitigation a bit earlier?
NODs broke through the 2000 threshold.
August 8, 2007 at 10:17 AM #71890HereWeGoParticipantSan Diego County update from sddt.com:
NOTs fell to 686 in July, but that’s still the second highest level since 1982 (June’s 738 is the current record.) Maybe lenders are initiating loss mitigation a bit earlier?
NODs broke through the 2000 threshold.
August 8, 2007 at 10:33 AM #71777GoUSCParticipantDon’t those origination figures only apply to bank originating funding? Aka now that half the mortgage broker business is out of business more loans are being directly funded at banks. Hence the rise…?
August 8, 2007 at 10:33 AM #71895GoUSCParticipantDon’t those origination figures only apply to bank originating funding? Aka now that half the mortgage broker business is out of business more loans are being directly funded at banks. Hence the rise…?
August 8, 2007 at 10:33 AM #71902GoUSCParticipantDon’t those origination figures only apply to bank originating funding? Aka now that half the mortgage broker business is out of business more loans are being directly funded at banks. Hence the rise…?
August 8, 2007 at 10:39 AM #71802HLSParticipantThat’s a ridiculous statement that I don’t have time to refute right now.
August 8, 2007 at 10:39 AM #71928HLSParticipantThat’s a ridiculous statement that I don’t have time to refute right now.
August 8, 2007 at 10:39 AM #71918HLSParticipantThat’s a ridiculous statement that I don’t have time to refute right now.
August 8, 2007 at 10:58 AM #71835GoUSCParticipantOkay my statement wasn’t the best…regardless, don’t those figures only include bank originated funding and not those deals done through mortgage brokers? If I am wrong clarify. And no half the mortgage brokers out there aren’t out of business but they aren’t doing many deals in Socal right now.
Could another explanation be than in light of the challenging loan business now, people are writing several apps to several lenders trying to find a loan product that works?
August 8, 2007 at 10:58 AM #71950GoUSCParticipantOkay my statement wasn’t the best…regardless, don’t those figures only include bank originated funding and not those deals done through mortgage brokers? If I am wrong clarify. And no half the mortgage brokers out there aren’t out of business but they aren’t doing many deals in Socal right now.
Could another explanation be than in light of the challenging loan business now, people are writing several apps to several lenders trying to find a loan product that works?
August 8, 2007 at 10:58 AM #71961GoUSCParticipantOkay my statement wasn’t the best…regardless, don’t those figures only include bank originated funding and not those deals done through mortgage brokers? If I am wrong clarify. And no half the mortgage brokers out there aren’t out of business but they aren’t doing many deals in Socal right now.
Could another explanation be than in light of the challenging loan business now, people are writing several apps to several lenders trying to find a loan product that works?
August 8, 2007 at 11:26 AM #71856The-ShovelerParticipantNor_LA-Temcu-SD-Guy
Is anyone out there noticing the Ten year ???
Quite a sell off today.
August 8, 2007 at 11:26 AM #71973The-ShovelerParticipantNor_LA-Temcu-SD-Guy
Is anyone out there noticing the Ten year ???
Quite a sell off today.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.