- This topic has 435 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 19, 2009 at 10:46 AM #402742May 19, 2009 at 1:31 PM #402206CascaParticipant
Vaughn, the process by which the outcome is already a certainty, but must appear to outsiders as a competitive event, is known as a beauty contest.
May 19, 2009 at 1:31 PM #402458CascaParticipantVaughn, the process by which the outcome is already a certainty, but must appear to outsiders as a competitive event, is known as a beauty contest.
May 19, 2009 at 1:31 PM #402690CascaParticipantVaughn, the process by which the outcome is already a certainty, but must appear to outsiders as a competitive event, is known as a beauty contest.
May 19, 2009 at 1:31 PM #402749CascaParticipantVaughn, the process by which the outcome is already a certainty, but must appear to outsiders as a competitive event, is known as a beauty contest.
May 19, 2009 at 1:31 PM #402897CascaParticipantVaughn, the process by which the outcome is already a certainty, but must appear to outsiders as a competitive event, is known as a beauty contest.
May 19, 2009 at 1:59 PM #402236briansd1GuestVaughn, interesting post.
I personally don’t think that the bank employees look at the big picture.
There are entrenched interests in each part of large organizations and it all depends on the compensation schemes.
In the past, the brokers and underwriters who issued loans didn’t care if those loans turned bad because they would already have pocketed their commissions.
Institutional self-preservation is very different from individual self-preservation and enrichment. When the compensation packages are at odds, you can be sure that individual self-enrichment will win out.
For example, my company processes a lot of credit card transactions and we pay lots of fees for that. But my account manager doesn’t care because his department doesn’t get any of that. His job is to open new accounts, and do loans.
When dealing with people, try to discover what’s in it for them. The more commissions they get to work with you, the more accommodating they will be.
May 19, 2009 at 1:59 PM #402488briansd1GuestVaughn, interesting post.
I personally don’t think that the bank employees look at the big picture.
There are entrenched interests in each part of large organizations and it all depends on the compensation schemes.
In the past, the brokers and underwriters who issued loans didn’t care if those loans turned bad because they would already have pocketed their commissions.
Institutional self-preservation is very different from individual self-preservation and enrichment. When the compensation packages are at odds, you can be sure that individual self-enrichment will win out.
For example, my company processes a lot of credit card transactions and we pay lots of fees for that. But my account manager doesn’t care because his department doesn’t get any of that. His job is to open new accounts, and do loans.
When dealing with people, try to discover what’s in it for them. The more commissions they get to work with you, the more accommodating they will be.
May 19, 2009 at 1:59 PM #402720briansd1GuestVaughn, interesting post.
I personally don’t think that the bank employees look at the big picture.
There are entrenched interests in each part of large organizations and it all depends on the compensation schemes.
In the past, the brokers and underwriters who issued loans didn’t care if those loans turned bad because they would already have pocketed their commissions.
Institutional self-preservation is very different from individual self-preservation and enrichment. When the compensation packages are at odds, you can be sure that individual self-enrichment will win out.
For example, my company processes a lot of credit card transactions and we pay lots of fees for that. But my account manager doesn’t care because his department doesn’t get any of that. His job is to open new accounts, and do loans.
When dealing with people, try to discover what’s in it for them. The more commissions they get to work with you, the more accommodating they will be.
May 19, 2009 at 1:59 PM #402779briansd1GuestVaughn, interesting post.
I personally don’t think that the bank employees look at the big picture.
There are entrenched interests in each part of large organizations and it all depends on the compensation schemes.
In the past, the brokers and underwriters who issued loans didn’t care if those loans turned bad because they would already have pocketed their commissions.
Institutional self-preservation is very different from individual self-preservation and enrichment. When the compensation packages are at odds, you can be sure that individual self-enrichment will win out.
For example, my company processes a lot of credit card transactions and we pay lots of fees for that. But my account manager doesn’t care because his department doesn’t get any of that. His job is to open new accounts, and do loans.
When dealing with people, try to discover what’s in it for them. The more commissions they get to work with you, the more accommodating they will be.
May 19, 2009 at 1:59 PM #402927briansd1GuestVaughn, interesting post.
I personally don’t think that the bank employees look at the big picture.
There are entrenched interests in each part of large organizations and it all depends on the compensation schemes.
In the past, the brokers and underwriters who issued loans didn’t care if those loans turned bad because they would already have pocketed their commissions.
Institutional self-preservation is very different from individual self-preservation and enrichment. When the compensation packages are at odds, you can be sure that individual self-enrichment will win out.
For example, my company processes a lot of credit card transactions and we pay lots of fees for that. But my account manager doesn’t care because his department doesn’t get any of that. His job is to open new accounts, and do loans.
When dealing with people, try to discover what’s in it for them. The more commissions they get to work with you, the more accommodating they will be.
May 20, 2009 at 11:45 AM #403056AnonymousGuestHi briansd1,
Thanks for the enlightenment. I guess that explains why the agent is representing the buyer and seller and sending stuff not listed yet.
Thanks for the info)
May 20, 2009 at 11:45 AM #403308AnonymousGuestHi briansd1,
Thanks for the enlightenment. I guess that explains why the agent is representing the buyer and seller and sending stuff not listed yet.
Thanks for the info)
May 20, 2009 at 11:45 AM #403544AnonymousGuestHi briansd1,
Thanks for the enlightenment. I guess that explains why the agent is representing the buyer and seller and sending stuff not listed yet.
Thanks for the info)
May 20, 2009 at 11:45 AM #403606AnonymousGuestHi briansd1,
Thanks for the enlightenment. I guess that explains why the agent is representing the buyer and seller and sending stuff not listed yet.
Thanks for the info)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.