- This topic has 435 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 1, 2009 at 12:58 PM #391891May 1, 2009 at 1:04 PM #391230CoronitaParticipant
I think one rule to sum this up….
It’s fine to hold yourself to a higher standard than others would themselves. But if you do, don’t regret/gripe/complain when others don’t play by the same playing field and expect someone else to level the playing field…
Anyway, back to the initial issue. My only gripe is I’m not part of the RE friends and family program. I see no different from the friends and family program that they use to offer pre-ipo for a company.
May 1, 2009 at 1:04 PM #391493CoronitaParticipantI think one rule to sum this up….
It’s fine to hold yourself to a higher standard than others would themselves. But if you do, don’t regret/gripe/complain when others don’t play by the same playing field and expect someone else to level the playing field…
Anyway, back to the initial issue. My only gripe is I’m not part of the RE friends and family program. I see no different from the friends and family program that they use to offer pre-ipo for a company.
May 1, 2009 at 1:04 PM #391702CoronitaParticipantI think one rule to sum this up….
It’s fine to hold yourself to a higher standard than others would themselves. But if you do, don’t regret/gripe/complain when others don’t play by the same playing field and expect someone else to level the playing field…
Anyway, back to the initial issue. My only gripe is I’m not part of the RE friends and family program. I see no different from the friends and family program that they use to offer pre-ipo for a company.
May 1, 2009 at 1:04 PM #391755CoronitaParticipantI think one rule to sum this up….
It’s fine to hold yourself to a higher standard than others would themselves. But if you do, don’t regret/gripe/complain when others don’t play by the same playing field and expect someone else to level the playing field…
Anyway, back to the initial issue. My only gripe is I’m not part of the RE friends and family program. I see no different from the friends and family program that they use to offer pre-ipo for a company.
May 1, 2009 at 1:04 PM #391896CoronitaParticipantI think one rule to sum this up….
It’s fine to hold yourself to a higher standard than others would themselves. But if you do, don’t regret/gripe/complain when others don’t play by the same playing field and expect someone else to level the playing field…
Anyway, back to the initial issue. My only gripe is I’m not part of the RE friends and family program. I see no different from the friends and family program that they use to offer pre-ipo for a company.
May 1, 2009 at 1:25 PM #391260anParticipant[quote=danthedart]
Good, we’re not talking about legal vs. illegal anymore.No I agree that your deal was perfectly ethical. And if that’s what happened in the cases mentioned by the OP, then that’s fine. But 1), that’s highly unlikely, because banks just like in your case, typically wait a little bit before accepting the offer. 2) SDR specifically called the agents and they were evasive. Why would you be evasive on something that is perfectly ethical?
I fully admit I don’t have conclusive proof that what they’re doing is unethical, but it seems very likely. [/quote]
SD R was my agent too and a lot of agents are evasive. Including the one that listed the property I bought. So, it’s nothing new. Each bank is different. Some chose to wait, even if the offer expires, and some take the first offer that meet their asking price. Just the same as some seller list below market and hope to get a bidding war while others list above market and hope some sucker will offer full price for it. If you gripe about the playing field is unfair, then I agree with you, but thinking someone got jipped from this deal, I highly doubt it. The banks are not stupid. They know what they want.May 1, 2009 at 1:25 PM #391523anParticipant[quote=danthedart]
Good, we’re not talking about legal vs. illegal anymore.No I agree that your deal was perfectly ethical. And if that’s what happened in the cases mentioned by the OP, then that’s fine. But 1), that’s highly unlikely, because banks just like in your case, typically wait a little bit before accepting the offer. 2) SDR specifically called the agents and they were evasive. Why would you be evasive on something that is perfectly ethical?
I fully admit I don’t have conclusive proof that what they’re doing is unethical, but it seems very likely. [/quote]
SD R was my agent too and a lot of agents are evasive. Including the one that listed the property I bought. So, it’s nothing new. Each bank is different. Some chose to wait, even if the offer expires, and some take the first offer that meet their asking price. Just the same as some seller list below market and hope to get a bidding war while others list above market and hope some sucker will offer full price for it. If you gripe about the playing field is unfair, then I agree with you, but thinking someone got jipped from this deal, I highly doubt it. The banks are not stupid. They know what they want.May 1, 2009 at 1:25 PM #391733anParticipant[quote=danthedart]
Good, we’re not talking about legal vs. illegal anymore.No I agree that your deal was perfectly ethical. And if that’s what happened in the cases mentioned by the OP, then that’s fine. But 1), that’s highly unlikely, because banks just like in your case, typically wait a little bit before accepting the offer. 2) SDR specifically called the agents and they were evasive. Why would you be evasive on something that is perfectly ethical?
I fully admit I don’t have conclusive proof that what they’re doing is unethical, but it seems very likely. [/quote]
SD R was my agent too and a lot of agents are evasive. Including the one that listed the property I bought. So, it’s nothing new. Each bank is different. Some chose to wait, even if the offer expires, and some take the first offer that meet their asking price. Just the same as some seller list below market and hope to get a bidding war while others list above market and hope some sucker will offer full price for it. If you gripe about the playing field is unfair, then I agree with you, but thinking someone got jipped from this deal, I highly doubt it. The banks are not stupid. They know what they want.May 1, 2009 at 1:25 PM #391785anParticipant[quote=danthedart]
Good, we’re not talking about legal vs. illegal anymore.No I agree that your deal was perfectly ethical. And if that’s what happened in the cases mentioned by the OP, then that’s fine. But 1), that’s highly unlikely, because banks just like in your case, typically wait a little bit before accepting the offer. 2) SDR specifically called the agents and they were evasive. Why would you be evasive on something that is perfectly ethical?
I fully admit I don’t have conclusive proof that what they’re doing is unethical, but it seems very likely. [/quote]
SD R was my agent too and a lot of agents are evasive. Including the one that listed the property I bought. So, it’s nothing new. Each bank is different. Some chose to wait, even if the offer expires, and some take the first offer that meet their asking price. Just the same as some seller list below market and hope to get a bidding war while others list above market and hope some sucker will offer full price for it. If you gripe about the playing field is unfair, then I agree with you, but thinking someone got jipped from this deal, I highly doubt it. The banks are not stupid. They know what they want.May 1, 2009 at 1:25 PM #391925anParticipant[quote=danthedart]
Good, we’re not talking about legal vs. illegal anymore.No I agree that your deal was perfectly ethical. And if that’s what happened in the cases mentioned by the OP, then that’s fine. But 1), that’s highly unlikely, because banks just like in your case, typically wait a little bit before accepting the offer. 2) SDR specifically called the agents and they were evasive. Why would you be evasive on something that is perfectly ethical?
I fully admit I don’t have conclusive proof that what they’re doing is unethical, but it seems very likely. [/quote]
SD R was my agent too and a lot of agents are evasive. Including the one that listed the property I bought. So, it’s nothing new. Each bank is different. Some chose to wait, even if the offer expires, and some take the first offer that meet their asking price. Just the same as some seller list below market and hope to get a bidding war while others list above market and hope some sucker will offer full price for it. If you gripe about the playing field is unfair, then I agree with you, but thinking someone got jipped from this deal, I highly doubt it. The banks are not stupid. They know what they want.May 1, 2009 at 5:07 PM #391375JACKQLYNParticipantRight or wrong
3% or 6%
You can beat them or join them.
I have made my own little $#it list of agencies to stay away from.
Had a good laugh when one was involved in this thread.
May 1, 2009 at 5:07 PM #391638JACKQLYNParticipantRight or wrong
3% or 6%
You can beat them or join them.
I have made my own little $#it list of agencies to stay away from.
Had a good laugh when one was involved in this thread.
May 1, 2009 at 5:07 PM #391848JACKQLYNParticipantRight or wrong
3% or 6%
You can beat them or join them.
I have made my own little $#it list of agencies to stay away from.
Had a good laugh when one was involved in this thread.
May 1, 2009 at 5:07 PM #391901JACKQLYNParticipantRight or wrong
3% or 6%
You can beat them or join them.
I have made my own little $#it list of agencies to stay away from.
Had a good laugh when one was involved in this thread.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.