Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Mission Hills: Low End Trends
- This topic has 430 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 3 months ago by pemeliza.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 16, 2011 at 1:17 PM #668159February 19, 2011 at 2:06 PM #668422jpinpbParticipant
pemeliza – I know you already saw this and posted it on SDL. Just want to also put it here. 906 W Lewis sold 03/28/2007 for $2,095,000. They tried to sell it in 2008 for $2,150,000. The reductions continued for over two years. Just closed for $1,270,000. 39% off the 2007 price and less than the 2003 price. We were NOT seeing these declines a year or two ago. Almost 40% off in Hillcrest. Two years ago people were arguing that there was no way Hillcrest would have such great reductions. Laughing at the mere thought of it.
February 19, 2011 at 2:06 PM #668484jpinpbParticipantpemeliza – I know you already saw this and posted it on SDL. Just want to also put it here. 906 W Lewis sold 03/28/2007 for $2,095,000. They tried to sell it in 2008 for $2,150,000. The reductions continued for over two years. Just closed for $1,270,000. 39% off the 2007 price and less than the 2003 price. We were NOT seeing these declines a year or two ago. Almost 40% off in Hillcrest. Two years ago people were arguing that there was no way Hillcrest would have such great reductions. Laughing at the mere thought of it.
February 19, 2011 at 2:06 PM #669091jpinpbParticipantpemeliza – I know you already saw this and posted it on SDL. Just want to also put it here. 906 W Lewis sold 03/28/2007 for $2,095,000. They tried to sell it in 2008 for $2,150,000. The reductions continued for over two years. Just closed for $1,270,000. 39% off the 2007 price and less than the 2003 price. We were NOT seeing these declines a year or two ago. Almost 40% off in Hillcrest. Two years ago people were arguing that there was no way Hillcrest would have such great reductions. Laughing at the mere thought of it.
February 19, 2011 at 2:06 PM #669230jpinpbParticipantpemeliza – I know you already saw this and posted it on SDL. Just want to also put it here. 906 W Lewis sold 03/28/2007 for $2,095,000. They tried to sell it in 2008 for $2,150,000. The reductions continued for over two years. Just closed for $1,270,000. 39% off the 2007 price and less than the 2003 price. We were NOT seeing these declines a year or two ago. Almost 40% off in Hillcrest. Two years ago people were arguing that there was no way Hillcrest would have such great reductions. Laughing at the mere thought of it.
February 19, 2011 at 2:06 PM #669573jpinpbParticipantpemeliza – I know you already saw this and posted it on SDL. Just want to also put it here. 906 W Lewis sold 03/28/2007 for $2,095,000. They tried to sell it in 2008 for $2,150,000. The reductions continued for over two years. Just closed for $1,270,000. 39% off the 2007 price and less than the 2003 price. We were NOT seeing these declines a year or two ago. Almost 40% off in Hillcrest. Two years ago people were arguing that there was no way Hillcrest would have such great reductions. Laughing at the mere thought of it.
February 19, 2011 at 10:00 PM #668542afx114ParticipantI rent literally 8 houses from that Hayes house, and it’s definitely University Heights. But damn, that’s a sweet deal. I love this little pocket of homes off Johnson Ave.
I also lived literally 2 lots down from that Van Buren house for many years. It is a mansion surrounded by apartments and bungalow homes. I remember it being listed in the nearly 2-mil range a couple years ago. Insane that it dropped all the way down to 900k. Or maybe just insane that it was once listed for almost 2 mil, depending on how you look at it.
February 19, 2011 at 10:00 PM #668604afx114ParticipantI rent literally 8 houses from that Hayes house, and it’s definitely University Heights. But damn, that’s a sweet deal. I love this little pocket of homes off Johnson Ave.
I also lived literally 2 lots down from that Van Buren house for many years. It is a mansion surrounded by apartments and bungalow homes. I remember it being listed in the nearly 2-mil range a couple years ago. Insane that it dropped all the way down to 900k. Or maybe just insane that it was once listed for almost 2 mil, depending on how you look at it.
February 19, 2011 at 10:00 PM #669211afx114ParticipantI rent literally 8 houses from that Hayes house, and it’s definitely University Heights. But damn, that’s a sweet deal. I love this little pocket of homes off Johnson Ave.
I also lived literally 2 lots down from that Van Buren house for many years. It is a mansion surrounded by apartments and bungalow homes. I remember it being listed in the nearly 2-mil range a couple years ago. Insane that it dropped all the way down to 900k. Or maybe just insane that it was once listed for almost 2 mil, depending on how you look at it.
February 19, 2011 at 10:00 PM #669350afx114ParticipantI rent literally 8 houses from that Hayes house, and it’s definitely University Heights. But damn, that’s a sweet deal. I love this little pocket of homes off Johnson Ave.
I also lived literally 2 lots down from that Van Buren house for many years. It is a mansion surrounded by apartments and bungalow homes. I remember it being listed in the nearly 2-mil range a couple years ago. Insane that it dropped all the way down to 900k. Or maybe just insane that it was once listed for almost 2 mil, depending on how you look at it.
February 19, 2011 at 10:00 PM #669693afx114ParticipantI rent literally 8 houses from that Hayes house, and it’s definitely University Heights. But damn, that’s a sweet deal. I love this little pocket of homes off Johnson Ave.
I also lived literally 2 lots down from that Van Buren house for many years. It is a mansion surrounded by apartments and bungalow homes. I remember it being listed in the nearly 2-mil range a couple years ago. Insane that it dropped all the way down to 900k. Or maybe just insane that it was once listed for almost 2 mil, depending on how you look at it.
February 19, 2011 at 10:07 PM #668552jpinpbParticipantYes. Exactly. Prices were insane back then. And now that we are seeing declines that are significant, we are to dsiregard them as a select few. But I think it could be new comps starting a trend.
February 19, 2011 at 10:07 PM #668614jpinpbParticipantYes. Exactly. Prices were insane back then. And now that we are seeing declines that are significant, we are to dsiregard them as a select few. But I think it could be new comps starting a trend.
February 19, 2011 at 10:07 PM #669221jpinpbParticipantYes. Exactly. Prices were insane back then. And now that we are seeing declines that are significant, we are to dsiregard them as a select few. But I think it could be new comps starting a trend.
February 19, 2011 at 10:07 PM #669360jpinpbParticipantYes. Exactly. Prices were insane back then. And now that we are seeing declines that are significant, we are to dsiregard them as a select few. But I think it could be new comps starting a trend.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.