Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Mira Mesa prices
- This topic has 540 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by ibjames.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 9, 2008 at 9:50 AM #236094July 9, 2008 at 10:05 AM #235920DWCAPParticipant
Average income is alittle skewed due to the high numbers of college and just out of college aged residents. These renters do not rely on 1-2 incomes to maintain the household. If it is a 4/2, they will attempt to cram 4-5 people into the house. Think a 4/2, 2200/month. 2200/4 is only $550 each. Since one bath will be attached to the master (bigger) bedroom, they will put a couple in there are raise the rent on that room alittle. Suddenly 3 people get their own room at $500/month, and a couple shares the ‘master’ for $350 each. If you cant afford that, you cant afford to live in SoCal.
July 9, 2008 at 10:05 AM #236046DWCAPParticipantAverage income is alittle skewed due to the high numbers of college and just out of college aged residents. These renters do not rely on 1-2 incomes to maintain the household. If it is a 4/2, they will attempt to cram 4-5 people into the house. Think a 4/2, 2200/month. 2200/4 is only $550 each. Since one bath will be attached to the master (bigger) bedroom, they will put a couple in there are raise the rent on that room alittle. Suddenly 3 people get their own room at $500/month, and a couple shares the ‘master’ for $350 each. If you cant afford that, you cant afford to live in SoCal.
July 9, 2008 at 10:05 AM #236057DWCAPParticipantAverage income is alittle skewed due to the high numbers of college and just out of college aged residents. These renters do not rely on 1-2 incomes to maintain the household. If it is a 4/2, they will attempt to cram 4-5 people into the house. Think a 4/2, 2200/month. 2200/4 is only $550 each. Since one bath will be attached to the master (bigger) bedroom, they will put a couple in there are raise the rent on that room alittle. Suddenly 3 people get their own room at $500/month, and a couple shares the ‘master’ for $350 each. If you cant afford that, you cant afford to live in SoCal.
July 9, 2008 at 10:05 AM #236102DWCAPParticipantAverage income is alittle skewed due to the high numbers of college and just out of college aged residents. These renters do not rely on 1-2 incomes to maintain the household. If it is a 4/2, they will attempt to cram 4-5 people into the house. Think a 4/2, 2200/month. 2200/4 is only $550 each. Since one bath will be attached to the master (bigger) bedroom, they will put a couple in there are raise the rent on that room alittle. Suddenly 3 people get their own room at $500/month, and a couple shares the ‘master’ for $350 each. If you cant afford that, you cant afford to live in SoCal.
July 9, 2008 at 10:05 AM #236114DWCAPParticipantAverage income is alittle skewed due to the high numbers of college and just out of college aged residents. These renters do not rely on 1-2 incomes to maintain the household. If it is a 4/2, they will attempt to cram 4-5 people into the house. Think a 4/2, 2200/month. 2200/4 is only $550 each. Since one bath will be attached to the master (bigger) bedroom, they will put a couple in there are raise the rent on that room alittle. Suddenly 3 people get their own room at $500/month, and a couple shares the ‘master’ for $350 each. If you cant afford that, you cant afford to live in SoCal.
July 9, 2008 at 10:24 AM #235940BugsParticipantI do a lot of income/expense analysis of income properties. Right now, property taxes (alone) are eating up 10% or more of the rents right off the bat. Add insurance, administrative (banking, accounting, tax prep, etc) expenses, maintenance costs, etc, and the real expense load starts at 30% and goes up from there. If you add in a total of two months vacancy or collection loss over an average 7-year holding period that adds up, too.
The ratios are actually higher for single family residences because of the economy of scale thing.
Check it out: MM home rents for $2000/month and is assessed at $300,000:
Annual rents = $24,000
$3,300 for taxes
$1,100 for insurance
$ 800 for administrative
$ 800 for annual repairs/maintenance
$1,000 for annual budget for painting, flooring, etc.
———
$7,000 in expenses
$20,368 for the mortgage payment ($270k Mtg @ 6.5%)
———
$27,368 in outlays
-24,000 in rents
———
-$3,368 in negative cash flow, not counting tax benefits if there are any. This is a best case scenario. That’s if the house never sits vacant for a single month and never has any big repair items. It assumes that you will do new paint and carpet every five years, which is stretching it if your tenants move every year.At 7.5% for the mortgage the combined annual negative would run about $5,500/year.
July 9, 2008 at 10:24 AM #236066BugsParticipantI do a lot of income/expense analysis of income properties. Right now, property taxes (alone) are eating up 10% or more of the rents right off the bat. Add insurance, administrative (banking, accounting, tax prep, etc) expenses, maintenance costs, etc, and the real expense load starts at 30% and goes up from there. If you add in a total of two months vacancy or collection loss over an average 7-year holding period that adds up, too.
The ratios are actually higher for single family residences because of the economy of scale thing.
Check it out: MM home rents for $2000/month and is assessed at $300,000:
Annual rents = $24,000
$3,300 for taxes
$1,100 for insurance
$ 800 for administrative
$ 800 for annual repairs/maintenance
$1,000 for annual budget for painting, flooring, etc.
———
$7,000 in expenses
$20,368 for the mortgage payment ($270k Mtg @ 6.5%)
———
$27,368 in outlays
-24,000 in rents
———
-$3,368 in negative cash flow, not counting tax benefits if there are any. This is a best case scenario. That’s if the house never sits vacant for a single month and never has any big repair items. It assumes that you will do new paint and carpet every five years, which is stretching it if your tenants move every year.At 7.5% for the mortgage the combined annual negative would run about $5,500/year.
July 9, 2008 at 10:24 AM #236078BugsParticipantI do a lot of income/expense analysis of income properties. Right now, property taxes (alone) are eating up 10% or more of the rents right off the bat. Add insurance, administrative (banking, accounting, tax prep, etc) expenses, maintenance costs, etc, and the real expense load starts at 30% and goes up from there. If you add in a total of two months vacancy or collection loss over an average 7-year holding period that adds up, too.
The ratios are actually higher for single family residences because of the economy of scale thing.
Check it out: MM home rents for $2000/month and is assessed at $300,000:
Annual rents = $24,000
$3,300 for taxes
$1,100 for insurance
$ 800 for administrative
$ 800 for annual repairs/maintenance
$1,000 for annual budget for painting, flooring, etc.
———
$7,000 in expenses
$20,368 for the mortgage payment ($270k Mtg @ 6.5%)
———
$27,368 in outlays
-24,000 in rents
———
-$3,368 in negative cash flow, not counting tax benefits if there are any. This is a best case scenario. That’s if the house never sits vacant for a single month and never has any big repair items. It assumes that you will do new paint and carpet every five years, which is stretching it if your tenants move every year.At 7.5% for the mortgage the combined annual negative would run about $5,500/year.
July 9, 2008 at 10:24 AM #236123BugsParticipantI do a lot of income/expense analysis of income properties. Right now, property taxes (alone) are eating up 10% or more of the rents right off the bat. Add insurance, administrative (banking, accounting, tax prep, etc) expenses, maintenance costs, etc, and the real expense load starts at 30% and goes up from there. If you add in a total of two months vacancy or collection loss over an average 7-year holding period that adds up, too.
The ratios are actually higher for single family residences because of the economy of scale thing.
Check it out: MM home rents for $2000/month and is assessed at $300,000:
Annual rents = $24,000
$3,300 for taxes
$1,100 for insurance
$ 800 for administrative
$ 800 for annual repairs/maintenance
$1,000 for annual budget for painting, flooring, etc.
———
$7,000 in expenses
$20,368 for the mortgage payment ($270k Mtg @ 6.5%)
———
$27,368 in outlays
-24,000 in rents
———
-$3,368 in negative cash flow, not counting tax benefits if there are any. This is a best case scenario. That’s if the house never sits vacant for a single month and never has any big repair items. It assumes that you will do new paint and carpet every five years, which is stretching it if your tenants move every year.At 7.5% for the mortgage the combined annual negative would run about $5,500/year.
July 9, 2008 at 10:24 AM #236134BugsParticipantI do a lot of income/expense analysis of income properties. Right now, property taxes (alone) are eating up 10% or more of the rents right off the bat. Add insurance, administrative (banking, accounting, tax prep, etc) expenses, maintenance costs, etc, and the real expense load starts at 30% and goes up from there. If you add in a total of two months vacancy or collection loss over an average 7-year holding period that adds up, too.
The ratios are actually higher for single family residences because of the economy of scale thing.
Check it out: MM home rents for $2000/month and is assessed at $300,000:
Annual rents = $24,000
$3,300 for taxes
$1,100 for insurance
$ 800 for administrative
$ 800 for annual repairs/maintenance
$1,000 for annual budget for painting, flooring, etc.
———
$7,000 in expenses
$20,368 for the mortgage payment ($270k Mtg @ 6.5%)
———
$27,368 in outlays
-24,000 in rents
———
-$3,368 in negative cash flow, not counting tax benefits if there are any. This is a best case scenario. That’s if the house never sits vacant for a single month and never has any big repair items. It assumes that you will do new paint and carpet every five years, which is stretching it if your tenants move every year.At 7.5% for the mortgage the combined annual negative would run about $5,500/year.
July 9, 2008 at 10:30 AM #235930anParticipantEconProf, I think you misunderstood why some of us compare cost of ownership with rent. It’s not to buy and rent it out right away. If that’s your intention, I agree, $225k would be a much more intriguing price. The reason why I use mortgage vs rent is to determine whether it’s cheaper for me to continue renting or buy. You’re throwing money way with rent, but you’re also throwing money away with interest and tax. The question comes down to, which one is less.
esmith, $200/month more makes a big difference. feraina also did a fine job explaining why UCSD students would prefer MM vs PQ/RB/etc. You can also rent a older (built in the 70s-80s) 2000+ sq-ft house with a decent size yard in MM for around $2100-2200 as well, if size and yard means more to you. You also have to be realistic about the commute time. I live on the west end of MM for many years and went to UCSD, worked in SV and CV. My commute to UCSD/CV usually take no more than 10 minutes anytime since there no traffic and commuting to SV should take no more than 5 minutes. How long will it take during peak traffic time to get across 56 or MM Blvd from PQ? I suspect it to be 30+ minutes.
cv2, Bugs, etc… I agree that when the parameters change, the price would also have to change. So if rent drops and/or rates rise, we have to see lower prices. The only problem is, these are unknown parameters and there’s no real good scientific way to predict them either.
July 9, 2008 at 10:30 AM #236056anParticipantEconProf, I think you misunderstood why some of us compare cost of ownership with rent. It’s not to buy and rent it out right away. If that’s your intention, I agree, $225k would be a much more intriguing price. The reason why I use mortgage vs rent is to determine whether it’s cheaper for me to continue renting or buy. You’re throwing money way with rent, but you’re also throwing money away with interest and tax. The question comes down to, which one is less.
esmith, $200/month more makes a big difference. feraina also did a fine job explaining why UCSD students would prefer MM vs PQ/RB/etc. You can also rent a older (built in the 70s-80s) 2000+ sq-ft house with a decent size yard in MM for around $2100-2200 as well, if size and yard means more to you. You also have to be realistic about the commute time. I live on the west end of MM for many years and went to UCSD, worked in SV and CV. My commute to UCSD/CV usually take no more than 10 minutes anytime since there no traffic and commuting to SV should take no more than 5 minutes. How long will it take during peak traffic time to get across 56 or MM Blvd from PQ? I suspect it to be 30+ minutes.
cv2, Bugs, etc… I agree that when the parameters change, the price would also have to change. So if rent drops and/or rates rise, we have to see lower prices. The only problem is, these are unknown parameters and there’s no real good scientific way to predict them either.
July 9, 2008 at 10:30 AM #236068anParticipantEconProf, I think you misunderstood why some of us compare cost of ownership with rent. It’s not to buy and rent it out right away. If that’s your intention, I agree, $225k would be a much more intriguing price. The reason why I use mortgage vs rent is to determine whether it’s cheaper for me to continue renting or buy. You’re throwing money way with rent, but you’re also throwing money away with interest and tax. The question comes down to, which one is less.
esmith, $200/month more makes a big difference. feraina also did a fine job explaining why UCSD students would prefer MM vs PQ/RB/etc. You can also rent a older (built in the 70s-80s) 2000+ sq-ft house with a decent size yard in MM for around $2100-2200 as well, if size and yard means more to you. You also have to be realistic about the commute time. I live on the west end of MM for many years and went to UCSD, worked in SV and CV. My commute to UCSD/CV usually take no more than 10 minutes anytime since there no traffic and commuting to SV should take no more than 5 minutes. How long will it take during peak traffic time to get across 56 or MM Blvd from PQ? I suspect it to be 30+ minutes.
cv2, Bugs, etc… I agree that when the parameters change, the price would also have to change. So if rent drops and/or rates rise, we have to see lower prices. The only problem is, these are unknown parameters and there’s no real good scientific way to predict them either.
July 9, 2008 at 10:30 AM #236113anParticipantEconProf, I think you misunderstood why some of us compare cost of ownership with rent. It’s not to buy and rent it out right away. If that’s your intention, I agree, $225k would be a much more intriguing price. The reason why I use mortgage vs rent is to determine whether it’s cheaper for me to continue renting or buy. You’re throwing money way with rent, but you’re also throwing money away with interest and tax. The question comes down to, which one is less.
esmith, $200/month more makes a big difference. feraina also did a fine job explaining why UCSD students would prefer MM vs PQ/RB/etc. You can also rent a older (built in the 70s-80s) 2000+ sq-ft house with a decent size yard in MM for around $2100-2200 as well, if size and yard means more to you. You also have to be realistic about the commute time. I live on the west end of MM for many years and went to UCSD, worked in SV and CV. My commute to UCSD/CV usually take no more than 10 minutes anytime since there no traffic and commuting to SV should take no more than 5 minutes. How long will it take during peak traffic time to get across 56 or MM Blvd from PQ? I suspect it to be 30+ minutes.
cv2, Bugs, etc… I agree that when the parameters change, the price would also have to change. So if rent drops and/or rates rise, we have to see lower prices. The only problem is, these are unknown parameters and there’s no real good scientific way to predict them either.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.