- This topic has 72 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 10 months ago by phaster.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 29, 2022 at 8:53 AM #826643August 29, 2022 at 10:49 AM #826644The-ShovelerParticipant
IMO time for geo engineering,
I have long advocated for it, even if USA were to completely go green how do you get the rest of the world on board when 80% of the world is living hand to mouth. So IMO geo engineering is only real option.
August 29, 2022 at 1:13 PM #826646teaboyParticipant[quote=scaredyclassic]Unless each person gives up … having kids, we are screwed[/quote]
Not according to Elon Musk.
[img_assist|nid=27730|title=|desc=https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1563020169160851456?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1563020169160851456%7Ctwgr%5E4a87f91079b8642ec1bec4856177c014da8e435a%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.business-standard.com%2Farticle%2Finternational%2Fpopulation-collapse-due-to-low-birth-rates-a-bigger-risk-than-climate-musk-122082900918_1.html|link=url|align=left|width=300|height=154]
tb
August 29, 2022 at 1:30 PM #826647teaboyParticipantthis is too good not to share, although i cant vouch for its authenticity.
tb
[img_assist|nid=27731|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=379|height=500]
August 29, 2022 at 10:23 PM #826648scaredyclassicParticipanthttps://vegnews.com/2022/8/clint-eastwood-plant-based-diet-planet
Clint’s even anti meat
September 2, 2022 at 11:36 AM #826661phasterParticipant[quote=scaredyclassic][quote=flyer]You definitely make some very good points, and as a person with degrees from MIT, I definitely could have made other career choices, but flying and real estate investment were in my blood, so, I went with those. Retired early from American Airlines during the pandemic, but will continue in real estate investment until we pass everything along to our kids
Knowing what I know now, my choices would have likely been different wrt aviation. Other than continuing to fly, in both our professional and personal lives, we’ve gone about as green as you can go, but that’s still just a drop in the bucket. Every person and every industry will need to be on board in order to save our planet, and profound changes will be required from each. Only time will tell if our efforts were successful.[/quote]
Unless each person gives up meat, cars, buying shit and having kids, we are screwed, which means we are screwed. I hate cars and I still need to use one next week.
Fuck it, let’s just get on with it and all go to heaven, where the supplies are plentiful. The suckers after us can deal with it.
[/quote]since you mentioned “heaven” AND given this is a real estate forum FYI as I see things the parable of the vineyard owner,… is a theological way to view the topic of “climate change and drought” mismanagement
[quote]
…a landowner set forth a vineyard with great care and lavish attentionhe then entrusted it to tenant farmers
at harvest time, he sought his share of the produce
yet instead of giving the owner what was due him, the tenant farmers refused, ridiculing, beating, and even killing the servants sent to collect his share
they end by killing the owner’s own son
when jesus asks his audience what they thought the owner would do in response, they replied that he would put the men to a wretched death and lease his vineyard to other tenants who would give him the produce at the proper time
obviously, they did not realize that in the parable the landlord was actually describing them,… and that such a judgment would be upon them unless they repented
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+21%3A33-46&version=NCB
[/quote]PS FWIW here is the mainstream view about environmental stewardship (AND is the reason why we are where we are,…)
[quote]
Californians Explain Why They Oppose Drought RestrictionsPerry Peterson (Construction Worker)
“For reasons I cannot possibly understand, my self-worth is extremely tied up in how well-maintained my lawn appears.”
Jose Harper (Financial Advisor)
“Sacrificing my own petty comforts for the survival of the planet is anti-American.”
https://www.theonion.com/californians-explain-why-they-oppose-drought-restrictio-1849480008
[/quote]
September 2, 2022 at 12:02 PM #826662phasterParticipant[quote=The-Shoveler]IMO time for geo engineering,
I have long advocated for it, even if USA were to completely go green how do you get the rest of the world on board when 80% of the world is living hand to mouth. So IMO geo engineering is only real option.[/quote]
time for geo engineering?!
fact is from 1850 to 2019, human activity has released 2,400 gigatons of CO2,… point being humanity is already “geo engineering”
[quote=Roger Revelle (1957) UCSD “founder”]
“Thus human beings are now carrying out a large scale geophysical experiment of a kind that could not have happened in the past nor be reproduced in the future. Within a few centuries we are returning to the atmosphere and oceans the concentrated organic carbon stored in sedimentary rocks over hundreds of millions of years. This experiment, if adequately documented, may yield a far-reaching insight into the processes determining weather and climate. It therefore becomes of prime importance to attempt to determine the way in which carbon dioxide is partitioned between the atmosphere, the oceans, the biosphere and the lithosphere.”[/quote]
October 16, 2022 at 12:22 PM #826824phasterParticipantFWIW,… some news about the drought that is having dramatic effects in other regions of the USA
[quote]
Traffic jams and stuck barges are clogging up a critical artery of the U.S. economy, as a prolonged drought pushes the Mississippi River’s water levels to near-record lows.Around 500 million tons of supplies are ferried along the Mississippi River every year with trade value worth $130 billion, according to the Port of New Orleans, mainly agricultural products, like corn and soybeans, along with fuel products. The Mississippi River Basin produces more than 90% of U.S. agricultural exports, according to the National Park Service, and nearly 80% of the world’s grain exports.
But all that is coming to a standstill amid historic drought conditions that are making the river untraversable for most shipping barges. River levels are now at their lowest level in a decade after historically low rainfall in recent months, becoming the latest supply-chain snag to hit the U.S.
“America is going to shut down if we shut down,” Mike Ellis, CEO of American Commercial Barge Line in Indiana, told the Wall Street Journal this week.
River traffic jams
The low water levels have clogged up entire sections of the Mississippi River in recent weeks, wreaking havoc on the local economy.
At least 2,000 barges were backed up along the river last week, Bloomberg reported, citing data from the U.S. Coast Guard. Also last week, the Coast Guard warned that at least eight heavy barges had become “grounded” in particularly shallow parts of the river.
With fewer barges able to navigate the river and longer wait times, prices are starting to go up.
“It’s definitely having an impact on the local economy, because the commercial use of this river has almost completely stopped,” George Flaggs, mayor of Vicksburg, Miss., told local news channel WAPT earlier this week, adding that the river around Vicksburg is the lowest he’s seen it in nearly 70 years.
“This will actually affect us in a very negative way. We have to have less cargo on our barges and less tonnage moving. It affects our revenues,” Austin Golding, president of Golding Barge Line, told WAPT.
It’s the worst possible time for a drought in the Mississippi, as early fall is typically when grain is harvested in the Mississippi Basin and sent down the river. Soybeans are the most commonly shipped commodity on the river, according to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, but the low water levels are throwing the supply chain into chaos.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/america-going-shut-down-shut-204307435.html
[/quote]bottom line,… “drought” is happening all over and people (in general) are not aware of the the disaster (of biblical proportions) that actually is a self inflected wound (caused by humanity)
https://www.piggington.com/waking_veganism_cholesterol#comment-299912
December 17, 2022 at 11:27 AM #827189phasterParticipantFWIW here is a news item that appeared on todays front page of the SDUT
[quote]
Growing fears of ‘dead pool’ on Colorado River as drought threatens Hoover Dam waterThe Colorado River’s largest reservoirs stand nearly three-quarters empty, and federal officials now say there is a real danger the reservoirs could drop so low that water would no longer flow past Hoover Dam in two years.
That dire scenario — which would cut off water supplies to California, Arizona and Mexico — has taken center stage at the annual Colorado River conference in Las Vegas this week, where officials from seven states, water agencies, tribes and the federal government are negotiating over how to decrease usage on a scale never seen before.
Outlining their latest projections for Lake Powell and Lake Mead, the nation’s two largest reservoirs, federal water managers said there is a risk Lake Mead could reach “dead pool” levels in 2025. If that were to happen, water would no longer flow downstream from Hoover Dam.
“We are in a crisis. Both lakes could be two years away from either dead pool or so close to dead pool that the flow out of those dams is going to be a horribly small number. And it just keeps getting worse,” said Tom Buschatzke, director of the Arizona Department of Water Resources.
He said there is a real danger that if the coming year is extremely dry, “it might be too late to save the lakes.”
December 17, 2022 at 5:30 PM #827192barnaby33ParticipantPhaster I vehemently disagree, it’s “self inflicted,” not “self inflected.”
We are about (at least in my area) to get a 25% rise in the price of water, not because of shortages, but just to fix our pipes. Dios mio I can’t imagine the usage charge increases that will come on top of that.
JoshDecember 18, 2022 at 1:24 PM #827198phasterParticipant[quote=barnaby33]Phaster I vehemently disagree, it’s “self inflicted,” not “self inflected.”
We are about (at least in my area) to get a 25% rise in the price of water, not because of shortages, but just to fix our pipes. Dios mio I can’t imagine the usage charge increases that will come on top of that.
Josh[/quote]infrastructure does not last forever AND infrastructure needs to be updated to keep water safe to drink
sigh,… people here in the USA have no clue what it is like to live w/ out a safe and abundant supply of water
I actually have a somewhat different take on the price of water since I’ve had the opportunity to travel in other parts of the world where there was not a safe and abundant supply of water
ever hear how fucked up Venezuela is???
the reason I mention Venezuela is because they have lots of oil reserves and really low gas prices ($0.02 USD/Liter)
http://take-profit.org/en/statistics/gasoline-prices/venezuela/
point being the power that be don’t want to raise gas prices because this appeases the citizen’s enough to keep the politicians in power BUT the trade off is an economy that does not functional very good over all
sadly as I see things, seems politicians here in the USA do pretty much the same thing as politicians do in Venezuela,… simply stated politicians do their best to suppress the prices of various natural resources like gasoline and water, which keeps everyone happy for the short run,… BUT over the long run this really fucks things up
WRT to the issue of “self inflicted” wounds,… actually suppressing the prices of various natural resources like gasoline and water, keeps everyone happy for the short run,… BUT over the long run this really fucks things up,… an example is “aridity”
which is caused by Big-Ag wanting to make as much profit as possible in the short term
[quote=USGS]
Irrigation accounted for most total withdrawals in the CRB [Colorado River Basin], excluding instream use for hydroelectric power and interbasin transfers, averaging 85 percent from 1985 to 2010.http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/sir20185049
[/quote]ever consider looking at the economically suppressed gasoline and water price problem in terms of military command doctrine (when it come to fighting a war)???
since a picture is worth a 1000 words
…point I’m trying to make is, basically politicians, business interests and consumers all around the world are operating at the “tactical” level,… here everyone wants to try and lock in as much short term gains/profits as possible,… BUT few are pondering the “operations” level of of war AND essentially no one is considering the “strategic” (i.e. big picture) level of of war
when no one has the “strategic” (i.e. big picture) level of of war, it is impossible to win a war,… for example WRT the Colorado River Basin, which is the key water supply for 40+ million people, since politicians, business interests and consumers don’t want to give up their gains, there is a very real possibility than the water will be all used up (because no one will care and the water will flow from taps, up until the point there is no more water in Lake Powell, Lake Mead, Lake Mohave, etc.)
December 19, 2022 at 9:30 AM #827204barnaby33ParticipantSo maybe Dennis Leary was right, we should all use the resources as fast as we can. Give ourselves as much short term comfort as we can, there is no fix. Short term maximizers FTW!
Seriously though maybe it’s because deep down I’m a socialist, or worse can extrapolate into the future, but the smack down on water isn’t coming it’s here. Over the course of my short (very handsome) life I’ve watched San Diego go from a massive exporter of fruit and veg to an almost total importer because of the cost of water. It’s not even subtle. That shift while maintaining supply was only possible because oil was cheap. Well now were running out of water and gas/oil/energy are relentlessly climbing in price. A lot of the bleating I hear about cost of living increases is food. That food all has to be imported because we don’t grow it here, why?
– Expensive land
– Expensive water
– Too many people (which is why the aforementioned are expensive)Maybe dog will bless us and end the drought, but I doubt it. We should probably have a plan B. Mine was use less and be more deliberate about how we use it. But hey maximizing has it’s upside too!
JoshDecember 22, 2022 at 7:40 AM #827205phasterParticipant[quote=barnaby33]Over the course of my short (very handsome) life I’ve watched San Diego go from a massive exporter of fruit and veg to an almost total importer because of the cost of water. It’s not even subtle. That shift while maintaining supply was only possible because oil was cheap. Well now were running out of water and gas/oil/energy are relentlessly climbing in price. A lot of the bleating I hear about cost of living increases is food. That food all has to be imported because we don’t grow it here, why?
– Expensive land
– Expensive water
– Too many people (which is why the aforementioned are expensive)Maybe dog will bless us and end the drought, but I doubt it. We should probably have a plan B.[/quote]
A Colorado River Doomsday is inevitably going to happen,…
The only way to avoid A Colorado River Doomsday is when elected political leadership and something like 90+% of the public at large admit and understand there are limits to growth (i.e. grasp water is a limited natural resource),… in addition to people taking into account the scientific idea of feedback loops
[quote]
…faced with doomsday projections from the Bureau of Reclamation about major reservoirs, officials agreed that harmony has not yet extended to how best to address the shortfalls triggered by more than two decades of drought, which have dramatically constricted both the river’s flows and water storage…Officials from seven states — Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming in the Upper Basin and Arizona, California and Nevada in the Lower Basin — spent three days publicly discussing which state or region must bear the brunt of any reductions, and privately deliberated on a multistate agreement.
Faced with a Feb. 1 [2023] deadline to provide an agreement to the Interior Department — and potentially circumvent a federally imposed fix — water managers acknowledged in interviews with E&E News they are still short of a deal.
[quote]
In his time at the California State Water Resources Control Board, Max Gomberg has witnessed the state grapple with two devastating droughts and the accelerating effects of climate change.Now, after 10 years of recommending strategies for making California more water resilient, the board’s climate and conservation manager is calling it quits. The reason: He no longer believes Gov. Gavin Newsom and his administration are willing to pursue the sorts of transformational changes necessary in an age of growing aridification.
[quote]
Irrigation accounted for most total withdrawals in the CRB [Colorado River Basin], excluding instream use for hydroelectric power and interbasin transfers, averaging 85 percent from 1985 to 2010.http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/sir20185049
[/quote][quote]
With agriculture responsible for roughly 80 percent of California’s water use, many question the practicality of crops that cannot be fallowed and the viability of producing food for export. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.