- This topic has 58 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 7 months ago by ocrenter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 20, 2006 at 9:50 AM #24406April 20, 2006 at 2:34 PM #24420powaysellerParticipant
Ok, Jim the realtor removed the article I linked. Oh well…
April 20, 2006 at 8:47 PM #24431Jim BrubakerParticipantI think that you have to realize that persons that buy into a bubble are not really playing with a full deck.
I don’t think that you will see a panic, rather just a bunch of REO will appear on the market. These should drop the property values dramatically. From that point you will see a bunch of pissed off home owners that can’t move or change jobs because they can’t sell their house.
The big question that has to be asked: When this stuff gets liquidated, who has to eat it? Your retirement plan or mine?
April 20, 2006 at 9:00 PM #24433powaysellerParticipantNot mine, since I sold my FNM, and am moving my cash from my prime money market into CDs. By the way, most MBS is owned by foreigners. When the value goes down, how will they react? Maybe they’ll buy Tnotes instead of MBS.
I hope everyone reading this realizes that the mortgage debt is purchased by money markets. Anyone with money markets not federally insured can lose value if MBS lose value, or Fannie Mae files bankruptcy. But I’m sure the government will bail out Fannie Mae. That will require more dollar printing, and higher inflation.
You can get the same yield of a MM by buying CDs. The rates are around 5% for a 4-month CD. So there’s no need to take the risk in a money market in a brokerage account. Vanguard has tons of CDs. Money market in banks are FDIC insured, I think.
April 21, 2006 at 10:45 AM #24455balasrParticipantA little off-topic. But regarding the Bressi-Ranch homes (also in North county), there is an ad in todays tribune. The Wisteria houses are advertised from the high 600s. That doesn’t square with the verbal offer someone got for 620 and with 20-30K off for something or the other. Any ideas why they aren’t advertising the lower price? Or are they offering 620 verbally to people and will suddenly raise it to high 600s at sign on time by putting in some “options” which are unavoidable?
April 21, 2006 at 11:55 AM #24456SDbearParticipantPowayseller,
Vanguard’s CA tax exempt Money Market does not contain any MBSs or Agency securities (Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae et.al). I checked with Vanguard on their exposure to real estate. They mentioned that 17.36% of their funds are invested in private ..(something).. bonds (bonds issued by CA govt to build private assets like stadiums). But they are still debt instruments that the CA govt is liable for. So I think they have the same risk exposure as the T-bills from treasury direct.April 21, 2006 at 1:56 PM #24457lendingbubblecontinuesParticipantTurn to page 7 in today’s North Inland section and you’ll see that they still have Wisteria Place “from the low $600,000s”
Conflicting information with the color ad on page 5…let there be no confusion, however, that these homes, er ALL homes, are worth SIGNIFICANTLY less than they are being sold for today.
April 21, 2006 at 2:14 PM #24458powaysellerParticipantWhen I called Vanguard, they told me that the Prime Money Market holds a variety of debt instruments, including Fannie Mae bonds. The GSE bonds are not listed in the prospectus.
I did not inquire about CA Tax Exempt, since I only have a couple bucks in that one.
So perhaps the CA Tax Exempt is safe. Regardless, if Fannie Mae goes bankrupt, the government will likely bail them out. They bailed out a hedge fund, with much less exposure to global markets than Fannie Mae has. So I wouldn’t really worry too much about the money market deal. It’s just if they do bail out Fannie Mae, they’ll not raise our taxes but print more money, really raising inflation.
I have a funny story. I took my youngster to the bank to make a withdrawal today, and he said, “Mom, where do they keep the money?” I blurted out,”They don’t keep money here, it’s all paper entries. If everyone withdrew their deposits, there isn’t enough here to handle it. See those folks sitting there, signing their loan documents? They have your money. The money is wired to everyone anyway, so we don’t need real money anymore. We pay with debit cards and checks. So son, there is probably a few thousand bucks in this bank, and that’s all they need”. He was amazed at all this information.
But the system works, so that’s good enough for me.
April 21, 2006 at 3:05 PM #24459sdrealtorParticipantDont pay too much attention to newspaper advertising. Deadlines are frequently weeks in advance and what you see re: real estate is old news. Walk-in and you find the “Special of the day” on a blackboard. And yes the salad bar is $4 extra 😉
April 22, 2006 at 6:28 AM #24472BostonAndOC_RE_perspectiveParticipantPowayseller,
Cut up those debit cards! They pose a HUGE risk for identity theft, and since they are linked to your actual funds you do not have the $50 fraud loss guarantee offered by credit cards.April 22, 2006 at 7:05 AM #24473powaysellerParticipantHow can someone use my debit card without knowing my PIN? If you make 3 false entries, the card stops working. If you make unusual purchases, the bank stops the card from working and calls me. This is actually a big hassle, as I once went to buy gas, and my card wasn’t accepted. It turned out the bank had temporarily shut off my card because I’d made a purchase in another state (internet purchase) earlier that day. So while I want to be careful of identity theft, I’m not sure I want to get rid of my debit card. I am a big believer in paying cash, whether by debit or check.
April 22, 2006 at 7:25 AM #24475ocrenterParticipantMore example of price cutting…
xx5 CAMINO HERMOSO, San Marcos, CA 92078
Bedrooms: 3
Baths: 2.5
Sq ft: 2,172
Listing Date: 04/21/06
List Price: $549,000 – $569,000here’s two comps in the same development:
xx3 Camino Hermoso, San Marcos, CA 92078
Bedrooms: 3
Baths: 2.5
Sq ft: 2,172
08/20/2004: $589,500xx4 Via Del Caballo, San Marcos, CA 92078
Bedrooms: 3
Baths: 2.5
Sq ft: 2,172
12/22/2005: $571,000
(btw, this was purchased by an investor who was trying to rent it out for $2200/month, after 4 months of sitting empty, he lowered it to $2000/month and found a renter. Assuming 20% down at 6%, he’s losing about $1300/month on a property that just lost $22,000 in 4 months.)April 24, 2006 at 10:08 PM #24529ocrenterParticipantwell, looks like things are a lot worse than I realized.
xx7 VIA DEL CABALLO, San Marcos, CA 92078
Bedrooms: 4
Baths: 3
Sq ft: 2,358
Listing Price: $550,000 – $599,876
Last Purchased: Dec 03 $460,000Check out this loser that bought the same exact model in March 2006. Looks like he just lost $75,000 in 1 month. keep in mind the lots are of similar size.
xx5 Via Del Caballo
Bedrooms: 4
Baths: 3
Sq ft: 2,358
Mar 06 $625,000April 24, 2006 at 10:24 PM #24531sdrealtorParticipantOnce again the danger of not understanding the data. The $625,000 was for the Former Model with tons of upgrades, a prime location and a much larger than average yard. Better properties always sell for premium prices. Not sure about the others but it looks like “this loser” actually paid a more than fair price even in light of the other cheaper priced model matches.
Prices are softening but the real estate market is a pretty darn efficient market. It’s because of the information systems created by Realtors. Homes typically sell for what they should while homes priced incorrectly rot on the shelves. If there were no Realtors and no Multiple Listing Service which is not a public utility but rather a system paid for and supported by Realtors homes would be very difficult to sell at any price.
April 24, 2006 at 10:24 PM #24532sdrealtorParticipant -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.