- This topic has 315 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 16, 2008 at 9:37 AM #223216June 16, 2008 at 9:53 AM #223060anParticipant
My wife works 3 12 hours shifts and she’s tired after 3 days too. But my cousin is doing just that, 6 12 hours shifts. He has been doing that for many years now. I couldn’t do it myself, but it doesn’t mean it’s right to punish those who can.
June 16, 2008 at 9:53 AM #223165anParticipantMy wife works 3 12 hours shifts and she’s tired after 3 days too. But my cousin is doing just that, 6 12 hours shifts. He has been doing that for many years now. I couldn’t do it myself, but it doesn’t mean it’s right to punish those who can.
June 16, 2008 at 9:53 AM #223178anParticipantMy wife works 3 12 hours shifts and she’s tired after 3 days too. But my cousin is doing just that, 6 12 hours shifts. He has been doing that for many years now. I couldn’t do it myself, but it doesn’t mean it’s right to punish those who can.
June 16, 2008 at 9:53 AM #223212anParticipantMy wife works 3 12 hours shifts and she’s tired after 3 days too. But my cousin is doing just that, 6 12 hours shifts. He has been doing that for many years now. I couldn’t do it myself, but it doesn’t mean it’s right to punish those who can.
June 16, 2008 at 9:53 AM #223227anParticipantMy wife works 3 12 hours shifts and she’s tired after 3 days too. But my cousin is doing just that, 6 12 hours shifts. He has been doing that for many years now. I couldn’t do it myself, but it doesn’t mean it’s right to punish those who can.
June 16, 2008 at 10:26 AM #223110SDEngineerParticipantWelcome to a progressive tax system (and one of the lowest of all the first world nations).
What is their reward for working so hard? Well, yes, their marginal tax rates go up – but so do yours and mine. Their reward is that they make more money of course (and probably have increased chances for promotion, etc). Yes, the government takes a slightly larger share of their “new” earnings, but they are still making more than they were before.
Heck, we ALL go through this. You know what? The money still spends even when the government takes a slightly larger share of it, and it’s still worth working for. Does the government take too much? Maybe – there are certainly a LOT of things the current administration is spending money on that I don’t care for (e.g. the war, the enormously bloated military budget, the 400bn per year we throw away as finance charges to the supersized debt, etc). However, I DON’T have a direct say in those, and while I may vote for people who are for reducing the parts of government I don’t care for, I accept that, in our system of government, there are equally those who want to reduce parts I don’t want to see reduced, and that LIKE the war spending, and the bloated military budget, etc, and the fact of the matter is that the budget will always be a compromise.
Given the way the system works, I’d much rather pay for what we owe – and currently, that means we NEED a tax increase. And, frankly, the lower middle class and below can’t afford that tax increase. So, unfair as it is, the tax WILL be paid by those who CAN afford it. Frankly, though Obama is not proposing taxing my particular bracket, I KNOW I can far more easily afford to pick up a slightly larger share of the tax burden than a household making, say, 50-60K/yr. I strongly suspect those making twice what I do can probably afford it even more.
When it comes down to it, we ARE a society. The REASON people can make these extraordinary incomes is BECAUSE of our shared society, which they should realize they have a larger investment in than someone who is poor or lower middle class.
June 16, 2008 at 10:26 AM #223214SDEngineerParticipantWelcome to a progressive tax system (and one of the lowest of all the first world nations).
What is their reward for working so hard? Well, yes, their marginal tax rates go up – but so do yours and mine. Their reward is that they make more money of course (and probably have increased chances for promotion, etc). Yes, the government takes a slightly larger share of their “new” earnings, but they are still making more than they were before.
Heck, we ALL go through this. You know what? The money still spends even when the government takes a slightly larger share of it, and it’s still worth working for. Does the government take too much? Maybe – there are certainly a LOT of things the current administration is spending money on that I don’t care for (e.g. the war, the enormously bloated military budget, the 400bn per year we throw away as finance charges to the supersized debt, etc). However, I DON’T have a direct say in those, and while I may vote for people who are for reducing the parts of government I don’t care for, I accept that, in our system of government, there are equally those who want to reduce parts I don’t want to see reduced, and that LIKE the war spending, and the bloated military budget, etc, and the fact of the matter is that the budget will always be a compromise.
Given the way the system works, I’d much rather pay for what we owe – and currently, that means we NEED a tax increase. And, frankly, the lower middle class and below can’t afford that tax increase. So, unfair as it is, the tax WILL be paid by those who CAN afford it. Frankly, though Obama is not proposing taxing my particular bracket, I KNOW I can far more easily afford to pick up a slightly larger share of the tax burden than a household making, say, 50-60K/yr. I strongly suspect those making twice what I do can probably afford it even more.
When it comes down to it, we ARE a society. The REASON people can make these extraordinary incomes is BECAUSE of our shared society, which they should realize they have a larger investment in than someone who is poor or lower middle class.
June 16, 2008 at 10:26 AM #223228SDEngineerParticipantWelcome to a progressive tax system (and one of the lowest of all the first world nations).
What is their reward for working so hard? Well, yes, their marginal tax rates go up – but so do yours and mine. Their reward is that they make more money of course (and probably have increased chances for promotion, etc). Yes, the government takes a slightly larger share of their “new” earnings, but they are still making more than they were before.
Heck, we ALL go through this. You know what? The money still spends even when the government takes a slightly larger share of it, and it’s still worth working for. Does the government take too much? Maybe – there are certainly a LOT of things the current administration is spending money on that I don’t care for (e.g. the war, the enormously bloated military budget, the 400bn per year we throw away as finance charges to the supersized debt, etc). However, I DON’T have a direct say in those, and while I may vote for people who are for reducing the parts of government I don’t care for, I accept that, in our system of government, there are equally those who want to reduce parts I don’t want to see reduced, and that LIKE the war spending, and the bloated military budget, etc, and the fact of the matter is that the budget will always be a compromise.
Given the way the system works, I’d much rather pay for what we owe – and currently, that means we NEED a tax increase. And, frankly, the lower middle class and below can’t afford that tax increase. So, unfair as it is, the tax WILL be paid by those who CAN afford it. Frankly, though Obama is not proposing taxing my particular bracket, I KNOW I can far more easily afford to pick up a slightly larger share of the tax burden than a household making, say, 50-60K/yr. I strongly suspect those making twice what I do can probably afford it even more.
When it comes down to it, we ARE a society. The REASON people can make these extraordinary incomes is BECAUSE of our shared society, which they should realize they have a larger investment in than someone who is poor or lower middle class.
June 16, 2008 at 10:26 AM #223262SDEngineerParticipantWelcome to a progressive tax system (and one of the lowest of all the first world nations).
What is their reward for working so hard? Well, yes, their marginal tax rates go up – but so do yours and mine. Their reward is that they make more money of course (and probably have increased chances for promotion, etc). Yes, the government takes a slightly larger share of their “new” earnings, but they are still making more than they were before.
Heck, we ALL go through this. You know what? The money still spends even when the government takes a slightly larger share of it, and it’s still worth working for. Does the government take too much? Maybe – there are certainly a LOT of things the current administration is spending money on that I don’t care for (e.g. the war, the enormously bloated military budget, the 400bn per year we throw away as finance charges to the supersized debt, etc). However, I DON’T have a direct say in those, and while I may vote for people who are for reducing the parts of government I don’t care for, I accept that, in our system of government, there are equally those who want to reduce parts I don’t want to see reduced, and that LIKE the war spending, and the bloated military budget, etc, and the fact of the matter is that the budget will always be a compromise.
Given the way the system works, I’d much rather pay for what we owe – and currently, that means we NEED a tax increase. And, frankly, the lower middle class and below can’t afford that tax increase. So, unfair as it is, the tax WILL be paid by those who CAN afford it. Frankly, though Obama is not proposing taxing my particular bracket, I KNOW I can far more easily afford to pick up a slightly larger share of the tax burden than a household making, say, 50-60K/yr. I strongly suspect those making twice what I do can probably afford it even more.
When it comes down to it, we ARE a society. The REASON people can make these extraordinary incomes is BECAUSE of our shared society, which they should realize they have a larger investment in than someone who is poor or lower middle class.
June 16, 2008 at 10:26 AM #223276SDEngineerParticipantWelcome to a progressive tax system (and one of the lowest of all the first world nations).
What is their reward for working so hard? Well, yes, their marginal tax rates go up – but so do yours and mine. Their reward is that they make more money of course (and probably have increased chances for promotion, etc). Yes, the government takes a slightly larger share of their “new” earnings, but they are still making more than they were before.
Heck, we ALL go through this. You know what? The money still spends even when the government takes a slightly larger share of it, and it’s still worth working for. Does the government take too much? Maybe – there are certainly a LOT of things the current administration is spending money on that I don’t care for (e.g. the war, the enormously bloated military budget, the 400bn per year we throw away as finance charges to the supersized debt, etc). However, I DON’T have a direct say in those, and while I may vote for people who are for reducing the parts of government I don’t care for, I accept that, in our system of government, there are equally those who want to reduce parts I don’t want to see reduced, and that LIKE the war spending, and the bloated military budget, etc, and the fact of the matter is that the budget will always be a compromise.
Given the way the system works, I’d much rather pay for what we owe – and currently, that means we NEED a tax increase. And, frankly, the lower middle class and below can’t afford that tax increase. So, unfair as it is, the tax WILL be paid by those who CAN afford it. Frankly, though Obama is not proposing taxing my particular bracket, I KNOW I can far more easily afford to pick up a slightly larger share of the tax burden than a household making, say, 50-60K/yr. I strongly suspect those making twice what I do can probably afford it even more.
When it comes down to it, we ARE a society. The REASON people can make these extraordinary incomes is BECAUSE of our shared society, which they should realize they have a larger investment in than someone who is poor or lower middle class.
June 16, 2008 at 10:33 AM #223114AnonymousGuestSDEingineer, agreed. Hopefully by August, I will be in the highest tax bracket I’ve ever been in. I’ll pay more in taxes. So what? It won’t be the end of the world.
Bottom line, those who make more can afford to pay more that’s why your taxes are more. Just shut up and pay it please. IMO, there is never going to be the hoped for flat tax. I don’t believe in making it easier on people who make most of the money and putting a heavy burden on those who make less money and cannot afford it.
June 16, 2008 at 10:33 AM #223219AnonymousGuestSDEingineer, agreed. Hopefully by August, I will be in the highest tax bracket I’ve ever been in. I’ll pay more in taxes. So what? It won’t be the end of the world.
Bottom line, those who make more can afford to pay more that’s why your taxes are more. Just shut up and pay it please. IMO, there is never going to be the hoped for flat tax. I don’t believe in making it easier on people who make most of the money and putting a heavy burden on those who make less money and cannot afford it.
June 16, 2008 at 10:33 AM #223233AnonymousGuestSDEingineer, agreed. Hopefully by August, I will be in the highest tax bracket I’ve ever been in. I’ll pay more in taxes. So what? It won’t be the end of the world.
Bottom line, those who make more can afford to pay more that’s why your taxes are more. Just shut up and pay it please. IMO, there is never going to be the hoped for flat tax. I don’t believe in making it easier on people who make most of the money and putting a heavy burden on those who make less money and cannot afford it.
June 16, 2008 at 10:33 AM #223267AnonymousGuestSDEingineer, agreed. Hopefully by August, I will be in the highest tax bracket I’ve ever been in. I’ll pay more in taxes. So what? It won’t be the end of the world.
Bottom line, those who make more can afford to pay more that’s why your taxes are more. Just shut up and pay it please. IMO, there is never going to be the hoped for flat tax. I don’t believe in making it easier on people who make most of the money and putting a heavy burden on those who make less money and cannot afford it.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.