- This topic has 315 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 6 months ago by NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 15, 2008 at 9:28 PM #223057June 15, 2008 at 11:07 PM #222926CoronitaParticipant
Obama’s doing a pretty good job trying to domesticating women back to a single income household himself, proposing that there is such a thing as a marriage penalty with his $250k special tax for households.
Not to mention i think his wife is a racist that hates white people.
June 15, 2008 at 11:07 PM #223031CoronitaParticipantObama’s doing a pretty good job trying to domesticating women back to a single income household himself, proposing that there is such a thing as a marriage penalty with his $250k special tax for households.
Not to mention i think his wife is a racist that hates white people.
June 15, 2008 at 11:07 PM #223043CoronitaParticipantObama’s doing a pretty good job trying to domesticating women back to a single income household himself, proposing that there is such a thing as a marriage penalty with his $250k special tax for households.
Not to mention i think his wife is a racist that hates white people.
June 15, 2008 at 11:07 PM #223077CoronitaParticipantObama’s doing a pretty good job trying to domesticating women back to a single income household himself, proposing that there is such a thing as a marriage penalty with his $250k special tax for households.
Not to mention i think his wife is a racist that hates white people.
June 15, 2008 at 11:07 PM #223090CoronitaParticipantObama’s doing a pretty good job trying to domesticating women back to a single income household himself, proposing that there is such a thing as a marriage penalty with his $250k special tax for households.
Not to mention i think his wife is a racist that hates white people.
June 15, 2008 at 11:34 PM #222946anParticipantFLU, totally agree. I could have sworn Obama said it’s time to reward work and not wealth. I guess he should change it to reward average work and not outstanding/extremely hard working/wealth. I know for a fact that an experienced nurse who work 6 days a week vs typical 3 days can make easily in the 130-150k range. If you have a married couple and both work that hard can easily rake in 260-300k. Aren’t they supposed to get rewarded for working 2x has hard as most people?
June 15, 2008 at 11:34 PM #223049anParticipantFLU, totally agree. I could have sworn Obama said it’s time to reward work and not wealth. I guess he should change it to reward average work and not outstanding/extremely hard working/wealth. I know for a fact that an experienced nurse who work 6 days a week vs typical 3 days can make easily in the 130-150k range. If you have a married couple and both work that hard can easily rake in 260-300k. Aren’t they supposed to get rewarded for working 2x has hard as most people?
June 15, 2008 at 11:34 PM #223063anParticipantFLU, totally agree. I could have sworn Obama said it’s time to reward work and not wealth. I guess he should change it to reward average work and not outstanding/extremely hard working/wealth. I know for a fact that an experienced nurse who work 6 days a week vs typical 3 days can make easily in the 130-150k range. If you have a married couple and both work that hard can easily rake in 260-300k. Aren’t they supposed to get rewarded for working 2x has hard as most people?
June 15, 2008 at 11:34 PM #223097anParticipantFLU, totally agree. I could have sworn Obama said it’s time to reward work and not wealth. I guess he should change it to reward average work and not outstanding/extremely hard working/wealth. I know for a fact that an experienced nurse who work 6 days a week vs typical 3 days can make easily in the 130-150k range. If you have a married couple and both work that hard can easily rake in 260-300k. Aren’t they supposed to get rewarded for working 2x has hard as most people?
June 15, 2008 at 11:34 PM #223109anParticipantFLU, totally agree. I could have sworn Obama said it’s time to reward work and not wealth. I guess he should change it to reward average work and not outstanding/extremely hard working/wealth. I know for a fact that an experienced nurse who work 6 days a week vs typical 3 days can make easily in the 130-150k range. If you have a married couple and both work that hard can easily rake in 260-300k. Aren’t they supposed to get rewarded for working 2x has hard as most people?
June 16, 2008 at 1:58 AM #222967TheBreezeParticipantIf you have a married couple and both work that hard can easily rake in 260-300k. Aren’t they supposed to get rewarded for working 2x has hard as most people?
You are one crazy Asian. Are you seriously saying that a couple who might have to pay a higher marginal rate on $10K to $50K of income are not being rewarded for working harder? This is really ridiculous. Add in 401(k) deductions for both spouses and you have at most $19K of income on which your theoretical couple might have to pay higher taxes.
Your arguments are ridiculous.
In any event, what you are really saying is that you want the government to spend like drunken sailors (The Bush administration has grown government at the highest rate in 30 years) while not paying for it. What you really want is for future generations to pay for all the Republicans current reckless spending. It’s sad that people like you don’t take responsibility for your actions and instead try to push off your responsibilities to future generations.
June 16, 2008 at 1:58 AM #223070TheBreezeParticipantIf you have a married couple and both work that hard can easily rake in 260-300k. Aren’t they supposed to get rewarded for working 2x has hard as most people?
You are one crazy Asian. Are you seriously saying that a couple who might have to pay a higher marginal rate on $10K to $50K of income are not being rewarded for working harder? This is really ridiculous. Add in 401(k) deductions for both spouses and you have at most $19K of income on which your theoretical couple might have to pay higher taxes.
Your arguments are ridiculous.
In any event, what you are really saying is that you want the government to spend like drunken sailors (The Bush administration has grown government at the highest rate in 30 years) while not paying for it. What you really want is for future generations to pay for all the Republicans current reckless spending. It’s sad that people like you don’t take responsibility for your actions and instead try to push off your responsibilities to future generations.
June 16, 2008 at 1:58 AM #223083TheBreezeParticipantIf you have a married couple and both work that hard can easily rake in 260-300k. Aren’t they supposed to get rewarded for working 2x has hard as most people?
You are one crazy Asian. Are you seriously saying that a couple who might have to pay a higher marginal rate on $10K to $50K of income are not being rewarded for working harder? This is really ridiculous. Add in 401(k) deductions for both spouses and you have at most $19K of income on which your theoretical couple might have to pay higher taxes.
Your arguments are ridiculous.
In any event, what you are really saying is that you want the government to spend like drunken sailors (The Bush administration has grown government at the highest rate in 30 years) while not paying for it. What you really want is for future generations to pay for all the Republicans current reckless spending. It’s sad that people like you don’t take responsibility for your actions and instead try to push off your responsibilities to future generations.
June 16, 2008 at 1:58 AM #223116TheBreezeParticipantIf you have a married couple and both work that hard can easily rake in 260-300k. Aren’t they supposed to get rewarded for working 2x has hard as most people?
You are one crazy Asian. Are you seriously saying that a couple who might have to pay a higher marginal rate on $10K to $50K of income are not being rewarded for working harder? This is really ridiculous. Add in 401(k) deductions for both spouses and you have at most $19K of income on which your theoretical couple might have to pay higher taxes.
Your arguments are ridiculous.
In any event, what you are really saying is that you want the government to spend like drunken sailors (The Bush administration has grown government at the highest rate in 30 years) while not paying for it. What you really want is for future generations to pay for all the Republicans current reckless spending. It’s sad that people like you don’t take responsibility for your actions and instead try to push off your responsibilities to future generations.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.