Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Massive financial bailout fails in the House
- This topic has 90 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by Arraya.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 29, 2008 at 5:15 PM #277966September 29, 2008 at 5:20 PM #278020crParticipant
Here’s an easier to read vote tally of California Reps:
Republicans voting yes:
Wally Herger (Chico)
Dan Lungren (Gold River)
George Radanovich (Mariposa)
Howard “Buck” McKeon (Santa Clarita)
David Dreier (San Dimas)
Jerry Lewis (Redlands)
Gary Miller (Diamond Bar)
Ken Calvert (Corona)
Mary Bono Mack (Palm Springs)
John Campbell (Irvine)Republicans voting no:
John Doolittle (Roseville)
David Nunes (Tulare)
Kevin McCarthy (Bakersfield)
Elton Gallegly (Simi Valley)
Ed Royce (Fullerton)
Dana Rohrabacher (Huntington Beach)
Darrell Issa (Vista)
Brian Bilbray (Carlsbad)
Duncan Hunter (Alpine)Democrats voting yes:
Doris Matsui (Sacramento)
George Miller (Martinez)
Nancy Pelosi (San Francisco)
Ellen Tauscher (Alamo)
Jerry McNerney (Pleasanton)
Jackie Speier (Hillsborough)
Anna Eshoo (Menlo Park)
Mike Honda (San Jose)
Zoe Lofgren (San Jose)
Sam Farr (Carmel)
Dennis Cardoza (Atwater)
Jim Costa (Fresno)
Lois Capps (Santa Barbara)
Howard Berman (Valley Village)
Henry Waxman (Beverly Hills)
Maxine Waters (Los Angeles)
Jane Harman (Venice)
Laura Richardson (Long Beach)
Susan Davis (San Diego)Democrats voting no:
Mike Thompson (St. Helena)
Lynn Woolsey (Petaluma)
Barbara Lee (Oakland)
Pete Stark (Fremont)
Brad Sherman (Sherman Oaks)
Adam Schiff (Burbank)
Xavier Becerra (Los Angeles)
Hilda Solis (El Monte)
Diane Watson (Los Angeles)
Lucille Roybal-Allard (East Los Angeles)
Grace Napolitano (Norwalk)
Linda Sanchez (Lakewood)
Joe Baca (Rialto)
Loretta Sanchez (Garden Grove)
Bob Filner (Chula Vista)September 29, 2008 at 5:20 PM #278007crParticipantHere’s an easier to read vote tally of California Reps:
Republicans voting yes:
Wally Herger (Chico)
Dan Lungren (Gold River)
George Radanovich (Mariposa)
Howard “Buck” McKeon (Santa Clarita)
David Dreier (San Dimas)
Jerry Lewis (Redlands)
Gary Miller (Diamond Bar)
Ken Calvert (Corona)
Mary Bono Mack (Palm Springs)
John Campbell (Irvine)Republicans voting no:
John Doolittle (Roseville)
David Nunes (Tulare)
Kevin McCarthy (Bakersfield)
Elton Gallegly (Simi Valley)
Ed Royce (Fullerton)
Dana Rohrabacher (Huntington Beach)
Darrell Issa (Vista)
Brian Bilbray (Carlsbad)
Duncan Hunter (Alpine)Democrats voting yes:
Doris Matsui (Sacramento)
George Miller (Martinez)
Nancy Pelosi (San Francisco)
Ellen Tauscher (Alamo)
Jerry McNerney (Pleasanton)
Jackie Speier (Hillsborough)
Anna Eshoo (Menlo Park)
Mike Honda (San Jose)
Zoe Lofgren (San Jose)
Sam Farr (Carmel)
Dennis Cardoza (Atwater)
Jim Costa (Fresno)
Lois Capps (Santa Barbara)
Howard Berman (Valley Village)
Henry Waxman (Beverly Hills)
Maxine Waters (Los Angeles)
Jane Harman (Venice)
Laura Richardson (Long Beach)
Susan Davis (San Diego)Democrats voting no:
Mike Thompson (St. Helena)
Lynn Woolsey (Petaluma)
Barbara Lee (Oakland)
Pete Stark (Fremont)
Brad Sherman (Sherman Oaks)
Adam Schiff (Burbank)
Xavier Becerra (Los Angeles)
Hilda Solis (El Monte)
Diane Watson (Los Angeles)
Lucille Roybal-Allard (East Los Angeles)
Grace Napolitano (Norwalk)
Linda Sanchez (Lakewood)
Joe Baca (Rialto)
Loretta Sanchez (Garden Grove)
Bob Filner (Chula Vista)September 29, 2008 at 5:20 PM #277971crParticipantHere’s an easier to read vote tally of California Reps:
Republicans voting yes:
Wally Herger (Chico)
Dan Lungren (Gold River)
George Radanovich (Mariposa)
Howard “Buck” McKeon (Santa Clarita)
David Dreier (San Dimas)
Jerry Lewis (Redlands)
Gary Miller (Diamond Bar)
Ken Calvert (Corona)
Mary Bono Mack (Palm Springs)
John Campbell (Irvine)Republicans voting no:
John Doolittle (Roseville)
David Nunes (Tulare)
Kevin McCarthy (Bakersfield)
Elton Gallegly (Simi Valley)
Ed Royce (Fullerton)
Dana Rohrabacher (Huntington Beach)
Darrell Issa (Vista)
Brian Bilbray (Carlsbad)
Duncan Hunter (Alpine)Democrats voting yes:
Doris Matsui (Sacramento)
George Miller (Martinez)
Nancy Pelosi (San Francisco)
Ellen Tauscher (Alamo)
Jerry McNerney (Pleasanton)
Jackie Speier (Hillsborough)
Anna Eshoo (Menlo Park)
Mike Honda (San Jose)
Zoe Lofgren (San Jose)
Sam Farr (Carmel)
Dennis Cardoza (Atwater)
Jim Costa (Fresno)
Lois Capps (Santa Barbara)
Howard Berman (Valley Village)
Henry Waxman (Beverly Hills)
Maxine Waters (Los Angeles)
Jane Harman (Venice)
Laura Richardson (Long Beach)
Susan Davis (San Diego)Democrats voting no:
Mike Thompson (St. Helena)
Lynn Woolsey (Petaluma)
Barbara Lee (Oakland)
Pete Stark (Fremont)
Brad Sherman (Sherman Oaks)
Adam Schiff (Burbank)
Xavier Becerra (Los Angeles)
Hilda Solis (El Monte)
Diane Watson (Los Angeles)
Lucille Roybal-Allard (East Los Angeles)
Grace Napolitano (Norwalk)
Linda Sanchez (Lakewood)
Joe Baca (Rialto)
Loretta Sanchez (Garden Grove)
Bob Filner (Chula Vista)September 29, 2008 at 5:20 PM #277958crParticipantHere’s an easier to read vote tally of California Reps:
Republicans voting yes:
Wally Herger (Chico)
Dan Lungren (Gold River)
George Radanovich (Mariposa)
Howard “Buck” McKeon (Santa Clarita)
David Dreier (San Dimas)
Jerry Lewis (Redlands)
Gary Miller (Diamond Bar)
Ken Calvert (Corona)
Mary Bono Mack (Palm Springs)
John Campbell (Irvine)Republicans voting no:
John Doolittle (Roseville)
David Nunes (Tulare)
Kevin McCarthy (Bakersfield)
Elton Gallegly (Simi Valley)
Ed Royce (Fullerton)
Dana Rohrabacher (Huntington Beach)
Darrell Issa (Vista)
Brian Bilbray (Carlsbad)
Duncan Hunter (Alpine)Democrats voting yes:
Doris Matsui (Sacramento)
George Miller (Martinez)
Nancy Pelosi (San Francisco)
Ellen Tauscher (Alamo)
Jerry McNerney (Pleasanton)
Jackie Speier (Hillsborough)
Anna Eshoo (Menlo Park)
Mike Honda (San Jose)
Zoe Lofgren (San Jose)
Sam Farr (Carmel)
Dennis Cardoza (Atwater)
Jim Costa (Fresno)
Lois Capps (Santa Barbara)
Howard Berman (Valley Village)
Henry Waxman (Beverly Hills)
Maxine Waters (Los Angeles)
Jane Harman (Venice)
Laura Richardson (Long Beach)
Susan Davis (San Diego)Democrats voting no:
Mike Thompson (St. Helena)
Lynn Woolsey (Petaluma)
Barbara Lee (Oakland)
Pete Stark (Fremont)
Brad Sherman (Sherman Oaks)
Adam Schiff (Burbank)
Xavier Becerra (Los Angeles)
Hilda Solis (El Monte)
Diane Watson (Los Angeles)
Lucille Roybal-Allard (East Los Angeles)
Grace Napolitano (Norwalk)
Linda Sanchez (Lakewood)
Joe Baca (Rialto)
Loretta Sanchez (Garden Grove)
Bob Filner (Chula Vista)September 29, 2008 at 5:20 PM #277696crParticipantHere’s an easier to read vote tally of California Reps:
Republicans voting yes:
Wally Herger (Chico)
Dan Lungren (Gold River)
George Radanovich (Mariposa)
Howard “Buck” McKeon (Santa Clarita)
David Dreier (San Dimas)
Jerry Lewis (Redlands)
Gary Miller (Diamond Bar)
Ken Calvert (Corona)
Mary Bono Mack (Palm Springs)
John Campbell (Irvine)Republicans voting no:
John Doolittle (Roseville)
David Nunes (Tulare)
Kevin McCarthy (Bakersfield)
Elton Gallegly (Simi Valley)
Ed Royce (Fullerton)
Dana Rohrabacher (Huntington Beach)
Darrell Issa (Vista)
Brian Bilbray (Carlsbad)
Duncan Hunter (Alpine)Democrats voting yes:
Doris Matsui (Sacramento)
George Miller (Martinez)
Nancy Pelosi (San Francisco)
Ellen Tauscher (Alamo)
Jerry McNerney (Pleasanton)
Jackie Speier (Hillsborough)
Anna Eshoo (Menlo Park)
Mike Honda (San Jose)
Zoe Lofgren (San Jose)
Sam Farr (Carmel)
Dennis Cardoza (Atwater)
Jim Costa (Fresno)
Lois Capps (Santa Barbara)
Howard Berman (Valley Village)
Henry Waxman (Beverly Hills)
Maxine Waters (Los Angeles)
Jane Harman (Venice)
Laura Richardson (Long Beach)
Susan Davis (San Diego)Democrats voting no:
Mike Thompson (St. Helena)
Lynn Woolsey (Petaluma)
Barbara Lee (Oakland)
Pete Stark (Fremont)
Brad Sherman (Sherman Oaks)
Adam Schiff (Burbank)
Xavier Becerra (Los Angeles)
Hilda Solis (El Monte)
Diane Watson (Los Angeles)
Lucille Roybal-Allard (East Los Angeles)
Grace Napolitano (Norwalk)
Linda Sanchez (Lakewood)
Joe Baca (Rialto)
Loretta Sanchez (Garden Grove)
Bob Filner (Chula Vista)September 29, 2008 at 10:10 PM #277929DaisyDukeParticipantYou saw what Wall Street did today, even before the final vote was cast!! Those pirates were jumping ship, or more accurately, were like Rats scattering for the exits! So much for helping out the American economy – they were bailing!
I appreciate the work done to do “something”, but so grateful for the bi-partisan Representatives who listened to the American people, and opposed this “CRAP“ bailout bill.
As I’ve always believed, it’s better to have “no friends” than to have “bad ones”. Maybe that applies to THIS bill . . . better to have “no bill” than to have a “bad one.”
Real fundamentals here we come, one way or another.
September 29, 2008 at 10:10 PM #278192DaisyDukeParticipantYou saw what Wall Street did today, even before the final vote was cast!! Those pirates were jumping ship, or more accurately, were like Rats scattering for the exits! So much for helping out the American economy – they were bailing!
I appreciate the work done to do “something”, but so grateful for the bi-partisan Representatives who listened to the American people, and opposed this “CRAP“ bailout bill.
As I’ve always believed, it’s better to have “no friends” than to have “bad ones”. Maybe that applies to THIS bill . . . better to have “no bill” than to have a “bad one.”
Real fundamentals here we come, one way or another.
September 29, 2008 at 10:10 PM #278206DaisyDukeParticipantYou saw what Wall Street did today, even before the final vote was cast!! Those pirates were jumping ship, or more accurately, were like Rats scattering for the exits! So much for helping out the American economy – they were bailing!
I appreciate the work done to do “something”, but so grateful for the bi-partisan Representatives who listened to the American people, and opposed this “CRAP“ bailout bill.
As I’ve always believed, it’s better to have “no friends” than to have “bad ones”. Maybe that applies to THIS bill . . . better to have “no bill” than to have a “bad one.”
Real fundamentals here we come, one way or another.
September 29, 2008 at 10:10 PM #278243DaisyDukeParticipantYou saw what Wall Street did today, even before the final vote was cast!! Those pirates were jumping ship, or more accurately, were like Rats scattering for the exits! So much for helping out the American economy – they were bailing!
I appreciate the work done to do “something”, but so grateful for the bi-partisan Representatives who listened to the American people, and opposed this “CRAP“ bailout bill.
As I’ve always believed, it’s better to have “no friends” than to have “bad ones”. Maybe that applies to THIS bill . . . better to have “no bill” than to have a “bad one.”
Real fundamentals here we come, one way or another.
September 29, 2008 at 10:10 PM #278255DaisyDukeParticipantYou saw what Wall Street did today, even before the final vote was cast!! Those pirates were jumping ship, or more accurately, were like Rats scattering for the exits! So much for helping out the American economy – they were bailing!
I appreciate the work done to do “something”, but so grateful for the bi-partisan Representatives who listened to the American people, and opposed this “CRAP“ bailout bill.
As I’ve always believed, it’s better to have “no friends” than to have “bad ones”. Maybe that applies to THIS bill . . . better to have “no bill” than to have a “bad one.”
Real fundamentals here we come, one way or another.
September 29, 2008 at 11:35 PM #278290CA renterParticipantFrom 4plexowner’s link:
Sept. 29 (Bloomberg) — The Federal Reserve will pump an additional $630 billion into the global financial system, flooding banks with cash to alleviate the worst banking crisis since the Great Depression.
The Fed increased its existing currency swaps with foreign central banks by $330 billion to $620 billion to make more dollars available worldwide. The Term Auction Facility, the Fed’s emergency loan program, will expand by $300 billion to $450 billion. The European Central Bank, the Bank of England and the Bank of Japan are among the participating authorities.
The Fed’s expansion of liquidity, the biggest since credit markets seized up last year, came hours before the U.S. House of Representatives rejected a $700 billion bailout for the financial industry. The crisis is reverberating through the global economy, causing stocks to plunge and forcing European governments to rescue four banks over the past two days alone.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=2…
———————–I was watching this news well before the market opened, and watched the futures tanking through the night. After the opening bell (and before the impasse was made public), the indexes were already quickly decending as did the overseas markets.
They are trying to blame the “record drop in the markets” on the Republicans who voted against the bailout. This is not true.
With all due respect, $700 billion would literally vaporize into thin air within a few weeks, and taxpayers would be that much poorer.
If I believed this would actually save our economy, even I would vote for it; but it will not help our economy nor assist anyone who will need a job in the next few months/years.
Let’s keep up the good work and keep calling our representatives (also might help if we called the guard dogs who kept this from passing…they need to be made aware of our support, too).
September 29, 2008 at 11:35 PM #277964CA renterParticipantFrom 4plexowner’s link:
Sept. 29 (Bloomberg) — The Federal Reserve will pump an additional $630 billion into the global financial system, flooding banks with cash to alleviate the worst banking crisis since the Great Depression.
The Fed increased its existing currency swaps with foreign central banks by $330 billion to $620 billion to make more dollars available worldwide. The Term Auction Facility, the Fed’s emergency loan program, will expand by $300 billion to $450 billion. The European Central Bank, the Bank of England and the Bank of Japan are among the participating authorities.
The Fed’s expansion of liquidity, the biggest since credit markets seized up last year, came hours before the U.S. House of Representatives rejected a $700 billion bailout for the financial industry. The crisis is reverberating through the global economy, causing stocks to plunge and forcing European governments to rescue four banks over the past two days alone.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=2…
———————–I was watching this news well before the market opened, and watched the futures tanking through the night. After the opening bell (and before the impasse was made public), the indexes were already quickly decending as did the overseas markets.
They are trying to blame the “record drop in the markets” on the Republicans who voted against the bailout. This is not true.
With all due respect, $700 billion would literally vaporize into thin air within a few weeks, and taxpayers would be that much poorer.
If I believed this would actually save our economy, even I would vote for it; but it will not help our economy nor assist anyone who will need a job in the next few months/years.
Let’s keep up the good work and keep calling our representatives (also might help if we called the guard dogs who kept this from passing…they need to be made aware of our support, too).
September 29, 2008 at 11:35 PM #278278CA renterParticipantFrom 4plexowner’s link:
Sept. 29 (Bloomberg) — The Federal Reserve will pump an additional $630 billion into the global financial system, flooding banks with cash to alleviate the worst banking crisis since the Great Depression.
The Fed increased its existing currency swaps with foreign central banks by $330 billion to $620 billion to make more dollars available worldwide. The Term Auction Facility, the Fed’s emergency loan program, will expand by $300 billion to $450 billion. The European Central Bank, the Bank of England and the Bank of Japan are among the participating authorities.
The Fed’s expansion of liquidity, the biggest since credit markets seized up last year, came hours before the U.S. House of Representatives rejected a $700 billion bailout for the financial industry. The crisis is reverberating through the global economy, causing stocks to plunge and forcing European governments to rescue four banks over the past two days alone.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=2…
———————–I was watching this news well before the market opened, and watched the futures tanking through the night. After the opening bell (and before the impasse was made public), the indexes were already quickly decending as did the overseas markets.
They are trying to blame the “record drop in the markets” on the Republicans who voted against the bailout. This is not true.
With all due respect, $700 billion would literally vaporize into thin air within a few weeks, and taxpayers would be that much poorer.
If I believed this would actually save our economy, even I would vote for it; but it will not help our economy nor assist anyone who will need a job in the next few months/years.
Let’s keep up the good work and keep calling our representatives (also might help if we called the guard dogs who kept this from passing…they need to be made aware of our support, too).
September 29, 2008 at 11:35 PM #278227CA renterParticipantFrom 4plexowner’s link:
Sept. 29 (Bloomberg) — The Federal Reserve will pump an additional $630 billion into the global financial system, flooding banks with cash to alleviate the worst banking crisis since the Great Depression.
The Fed increased its existing currency swaps with foreign central banks by $330 billion to $620 billion to make more dollars available worldwide. The Term Auction Facility, the Fed’s emergency loan program, will expand by $300 billion to $450 billion. The European Central Bank, the Bank of England and the Bank of Japan are among the participating authorities.
The Fed’s expansion of liquidity, the biggest since credit markets seized up last year, came hours before the U.S. House of Representatives rejected a $700 billion bailout for the financial industry. The crisis is reverberating through the global economy, causing stocks to plunge and forcing European governments to rescue four banks over the past two days alone.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=2…
———————–I was watching this news well before the market opened, and watched the futures tanking through the night. After the opening bell (and before the impasse was made public), the indexes were already quickly decending as did the overseas markets.
They are trying to blame the “record drop in the markets” on the Republicans who voted against the bailout. This is not true.
With all due respect, $700 billion would literally vaporize into thin air within a few weeks, and taxpayers would be that much poorer.
If I believed this would actually save our economy, even I would vote for it; but it will not help our economy nor assist anyone who will need a job in the next few months/years.
Let’s keep up the good work and keep calling our representatives (also might help if we called the guard dogs who kept this from passing…they need to be made aware of our support, too).
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.