Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Massive 26% Markdown on Carmel Valley McMansion
- This topic has 285 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by New_Renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 3, 2008 at 2:43 PM #128909January 3, 2008 at 3:18 PM #128643(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant
Medium Price ? Pepsi ?
Submitted by pepsi on January 3, 2008 – 1:52pm.
Just some numbers for CV (signle family resell):
Medium price (2001 – 2006):
2001: $610K
2002: $670K
2003: $750K
2004: $969K
2005: $1.04M
2006: $1.028M
Medium Price for Nov, 2007: $875K (That is less than 5% annual appreciation from 2001 medium price)
January 3, 2008 at 3:18 PM #128809(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantMedium Price ? Pepsi ?
Submitted by pepsi on January 3, 2008 – 1:52pm.
Just some numbers for CV (signle family resell):
Medium price (2001 – 2006):
2001: $610K
2002: $670K
2003: $750K
2004: $969K
2005: $1.04M
2006: $1.028M
Medium Price for Nov, 2007: $875K (That is less than 5% annual appreciation from 2001 medium price)
January 3, 2008 at 3:18 PM #128816(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantMedium Price ? Pepsi ?
Submitted by pepsi on January 3, 2008 – 1:52pm.
Just some numbers for CV (signle family resell):
Medium price (2001 – 2006):
2001: $610K
2002: $670K
2003: $750K
2004: $969K
2005: $1.04M
2006: $1.028M
Medium Price for Nov, 2007: $875K (That is less than 5% annual appreciation from 2001 medium price)
January 3, 2008 at 3:18 PM #128885(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantMedium Price ? Pepsi ?
Submitted by pepsi on January 3, 2008 – 1:52pm.
Just some numbers for CV (signle family resell):
Medium price (2001 – 2006):
2001: $610K
2002: $670K
2003: $750K
2004: $969K
2005: $1.04M
2006: $1.028M
Medium Price for Nov, 2007: $875K (That is less than 5% annual appreciation from 2001 medium price)
January 3, 2008 at 3:18 PM #128914(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantMedium Price ? Pepsi ?
Submitted by pepsi on January 3, 2008 – 1:52pm.
Just some numbers for CV (signle family resell):
Medium price (2001 – 2006):
2001: $610K
2002: $670K
2003: $750K
2004: $969K
2005: $1.04M
2006: $1.028M
Medium Price for Nov, 2007: $875K (That is less than 5% annual appreciation from 2001 medium price)
January 3, 2008 at 3:26 PM #128648Ex-SDParticipantHousing prices may or may NOT follow the percentage of inflation, even in a healthy market. There are many factors that cause housing to go up when times are good and inflation is only one of them. I’ve read quite a few posts since I started reading this board where many a poster automatically figures in inflation when trying to determine where a house should presently be priced. I’m not saying that they’re absolutely wrong…..it’s just my opinion that they are. If “X” house was selling for $500k in 2001 and housing returns to 2001 levels, my opinion is that “X” house will most likely return to a price of $500k……NOT $500k plus the cost of inflation for the years between 2001-2008. Reality has no rules and regulations when it comes to housing bubbles bursting and it IS and will continue to BE a buyers market for a long time. There is just way too much inventory and it’s going to get a lot larger and there’s going to be a shortage of good, qualified buyers with down payments and the desire to buy all of these properties unless they’re severely discounted.
January 3, 2008 at 3:26 PM #128814Ex-SDParticipantHousing prices may or may NOT follow the percentage of inflation, even in a healthy market. There are many factors that cause housing to go up when times are good and inflation is only one of them. I’ve read quite a few posts since I started reading this board where many a poster automatically figures in inflation when trying to determine where a house should presently be priced. I’m not saying that they’re absolutely wrong…..it’s just my opinion that they are. If “X” house was selling for $500k in 2001 and housing returns to 2001 levels, my opinion is that “X” house will most likely return to a price of $500k……NOT $500k plus the cost of inflation for the years between 2001-2008. Reality has no rules and regulations when it comes to housing bubbles bursting and it IS and will continue to BE a buyers market for a long time. There is just way too much inventory and it’s going to get a lot larger and there’s going to be a shortage of good, qualified buyers with down payments and the desire to buy all of these properties unless they’re severely discounted.
January 3, 2008 at 3:26 PM #128821Ex-SDParticipantHousing prices may or may NOT follow the percentage of inflation, even in a healthy market. There are many factors that cause housing to go up when times are good and inflation is only one of them. I’ve read quite a few posts since I started reading this board where many a poster automatically figures in inflation when trying to determine where a house should presently be priced. I’m not saying that they’re absolutely wrong…..it’s just my opinion that they are. If “X” house was selling for $500k in 2001 and housing returns to 2001 levels, my opinion is that “X” house will most likely return to a price of $500k……NOT $500k plus the cost of inflation for the years between 2001-2008. Reality has no rules and regulations when it comes to housing bubbles bursting and it IS and will continue to BE a buyers market for a long time. There is just way too much inventory and it’s going to get a lot larger and there’s going to be a shortage of good, qualified buyers with down payments and the desire to buy all of these properties unless they’re severely discounted.
January 3, 2008 at 3:26 PM #128890Ex-SDParticipantHousing prices may or may NOT follow the percentage of inflation, even in a healthy market. There are many factors that cause housing to go up when times are good and inflation is only one of them. I’ve read quite a few posts since I started reading this board where many a poster automatically figures in inflation when trying to determine where a house should presently be priced. I’m not saying that they’re absolutely wrong…..it’s just my opinion that they are. If “X” house was selling for $500k in 2001 and housing returns to 2001 levels, my opinion is that “X” house will most likely return to a price of $500k……NOT $500k plus the cost of inflation for the years between 2001-2008. Reality has no rules and regulations when it comes to housing bubbles bursting and it IS and will continue to BE a buyers market for a long time. There is just way too much inventory and it’s going to get a lot larger and there’s going to be a shortage of good, qualified buyers with down payments and the desire to buy all of these properties unless they’re severely discounted.
January 3, 2008 at 3:26 PM #128919Ex-SDParticipantHousing prices may or may NOT follow the percentage of inflation, even in a healthy market. There are many factors that cause housing to go up when times are good and inflation is only one of them. I’ve read quite a few posts since I started reading this board where many a poster automatically figures in inflation when trying to determine where a house should presently be priced. I’m not saying that they’re absolutely wrong…..it’s just my opinion that they are. If “X” house was selling for $500k in 2001 and housing returns to 2001 levels, my opinion is that “X” house will most likely return to a price of $500k……NOT $500k plus the cost of inflation for the years between 2001-2008. Reality has no rules and regulations when it comes to housing bubbles bursting and it IS and will continue to BE a buyers market for a long time. There is just way too much inventory and it’s going to get a lot larger and there’s going to be a shortage of good, qualified buyers with down payments and the desire to buy all of these properties unless they’re severely discounted.
January 3, 2008 at 3:49 PM #128668(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantHousing prices may or may NOT follow the percentage of inflation, even in a healthy market. There are many factors that cause housing to go up when times are good and inflation is only one of them. I’ve read quite a few posts since I started reading this board where many a poster automatically figures in inflation when trying to determine where a house should presently be priced. I’m not saying that they’re absolutely wrong…..it’s just my opinion that they are. If “X” house was selling for $500k in 2001 and housing returns to 2001 levels, my opinion is that “X” house will most likely return to a price of $500k……NOT $500k plus the cost of inflation for the years between 2001-2008.
Over long periods of time inflation matters.
Indexing to inflation accounts for distortions in nominal dollar terms. Any economist worth his/her salt accounts for inflation. (Schiff does, Shiller does).One could use prices, relative to incomes (as Rich does) to come up with perhaps a more relevant metric.
If one ignores inflation one might make the mistake of expecting prices to revert to where they were in 1965 when a SFR in Point Loma could be had for about $35K. After all the weather is not that much better now, is it ?
January 3, 2008 at 3:49 PM #128833(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantHousing prices may or may NOT follow the percentage of inflation, even in a healthy market. There are many factors that cause housing to go up when times are good and inflation is only one of them. I’ve read quite a few posts since I started reading this board where many a poster automatically figures in inflation when trying to determine where a house should presently be priced. I’m not saying that they’re absolutely wrong…..it’s just my opinion that they are. If “X” house was selling for $500k in 2001 and housing returns to 2001 levels, my opinion is that “X” house will most likely return to a price of $500k……NOT $500k plus the cost of inflation for the years between 2001-2008.
Over long periods of time inflation matters.
Indexing to inflation accounts for distortions in nominal dollar terms. Any economist worth his/her salt accounts for inflation. (Schiff does, Shiller does).One could use prices, relative to incomes (as Rich does) to come up with perhaps a more relevant metric.
If one ignores inflation one might make the mistake of expecting prices to revert to where they were in 1965 when a SFR in Point Loma could be had for about $35K. After all the weather is not that much better now, is it ?
January 3, 2008 at 3:49 PM #128841(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantHousing prices may or may NOT follow the percentage of inflation, even in a healthy market. There are many factors that cause housing to go up when times are good and inflation is only one of them. I’ve read quite a few posts since I started reading this board where many a poster automatically figures in inflation when trying to determine where a house should presently be priced. I’m not saying that they’re absolutely wrong…..it’s just my opinion that they are. If “X” house was selling for $500k in 2001 and housing returns to 2001 levels, my opinion is that “X” house will most likely return to a price of $500k……NOT $500k plus the cost of inflation for the years between 2001-2008.
Over long periods of time inflation matters.
Indexing to inflation accounts for distortions in nominal dollar terms. Any economist worth his/her salt accounts for inflation. (Schiff does, Shiller does).One could use prices, relative to incomes (as Rich does) to come up with perhaps a more relevant metric.
If one ignores inflation one might make the mistake of expecting prices to revert to where they were in 1965 when a SFR in Point Loma could be had for about $35K. After all the weather is not that much better now, is it ?
January 3, 2008 at 3:49 PM #128910(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantHousing prices may or may NOT follow the percentage of inflation, even in a healthy market. There are many factors that cause housing to go up when times are good and inflation is only one of them. I’ve read quite a few posts since I started reading this board where many a poster automatically figures in inflation when trying to determine where a house should presently be priced. I’m not saying that they’re absolutely wrong…..it’s just my opinion that they are. If “X” house was selling for $500k in 2001 and housing returns to 2001 levels, my opinion is that “X” house will most likely return to a price of $500k……NOT $500k plus the cost of inflation for the years between 2001-2008.
Over long periods of time inflation matters.
Indexing to inflation accounts for distortions in nominal dollar terms. Any economist worth his/her salt accounts for inflation. (Schiff does, Shiller does).One could use prices, relative to incomes (as Rich does) to come up with perhaps a more relevant metric.
If one ignores inflation one might make the mistake of expecting prices to revert to where they were in 1965 when a SFR in Point Loma could be had for about $35K. After all the weather is not that much better now, is it ?
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.