Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Mandolin Del Sur
- This topic has 140 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 1, 2009 at 10:19 AM #391651May 1, 2009 at 10:58 AM #391025UCGalParticipant
Way back in the pre-MelloRoos days developers had to kick in for some of these things. I live in University City – developers had to kick in for the Regents Road bridge (that still isn’t built due to NIMBYism.). That money is still sitting, escrowed, in the city coffers while various factions fight over it. Developers also had to kick in towards building Curie, Marcy (now gone), Standley M.S., and UCHS. It was part of getting the development approved – the developers had to kick in for infrastructure. It didn’t mean this stuff got built in a timely fashion… Standley was 5 years behind the developers promises, UCHS about 10 years behind it.
Then they came up with a way to pass that on, more directly, to the homeowner…
May 1, 2009 at 10:58 AM #391288UCGalParticipantWay back in the pre-MelloRoos days developers had to kick in for some of these things. I live in University City – developers had to kick in for the Regents Road bridge (that still isn’t built due to NIMBYism.). That money is still sitting, escrowed, in the city coffers while various factions fight over it. Developers also had to kick in towards building Curie, Marcy (now gone), Standley M.S., and UCHS. It was part of getting the development approved – the developers had to kick in for infrastructure. It didn’t mean this stuff got built in a timely fashion… Standley was 5 years behind the developers promises, UCHS about 10 years behind it.
Then they came up with a way to pass that on, more directly, to the homeowner…
May 1, 2009 at 10:58 AM #391497UCGalParticipantWay back in the pre-MelloRoos days developers had to kick in for some of these things. I live in University City – developers had to kick in for the Regents Road bridge (that still isn’t built due to NIMBYism.). That money is still sitting, escrowed, in the city coffers while various factions fight over it. Developers also had to kick in towards building Curie, Marcy (now gone), Standley M.S., and UCHS. It was part of getting the development approved – the developers had to kick in for infrastructure. It didn’t mean this stuff got built in a timely fashion… Standley was 5 years behind the developers promises, UCHS about 10 years behind it.
Then they came up with a way to pass that on, more directly, to the homeowner…
May 1, 2009 at 10:58 AM #391549UCGalParticipantWay back in the pre-MelloRoos days developers had to kick in for some of these things. I live in University City – developers had to kick in for the Regents Road bridge (that still isn’t built due to NIMBYism.). That money is still sitting, escrowed, in the city coffers while various factions fight over it. Developers also had to kick in towards building Curie, Marcy (now gone), Standley M.S., and UCHS. It was part of getting the development approved – the developers had to kick in for infrastructure. It didn’t mean this stuff got built in a timely fashion… Standley was 5 years behind the developers promises, UCHS about 10 years behind it.
Then they came up with a way to pass that on, more directly, to the homeowner…
May 1, 2009 at 10:58 AM #391691UCGalParticipantWay back in the pre-MelloRoos days developers had to kick in for some of these things. I live in University City – developers had to kick in for the Regents Road bridge (that still isn’t built due to NIMBYism.). That money is still sitting, escrowed, in the city coffers while various factions fight over it. Developers also had to kick in towards building Curie, Marcy (now gone), Standley M.S., and UCHS. It was part of getting the development approved – the developers had to kick in for infrastructure. It didn’t mean this stuff got built in a timely fashion… Standley was 5 years behind the developers promises, UCHS about 10 years behind it.
Then they came up with a way to pass that on, more directly, to the homeowner…
May 1, 2009 at 11:00 AM #391040ybitzParticipantAre there any data out there that compiles which areas have Mello-Roos and which don’t? Ideally it would be a map with colored regions showing MR areas. My only way of getting this info right now is looking at MLS listings (some listings say whether or not there’s MR) and getting a rough idea over time which regions are MR regions. There’s gotta be an easier and more reliable way.
May 1, 2009 at 11:00 AM #391303ybitzParticipantAre there any data out there that compiles which areas have Mello-Roos and which don’t? Ideally it would be a map with colored regions showing MR areas. My only way of getting this info right now is looking at MLS listings (some listings say whether or not there’s MR) and getting a rough idea over time which regions are MR regions. There’s gotta be an easier and more reliable way.
May 1, 2009 at 11:00 AM #391512ybitzParticipantAre there any data out there that compiles which areas have Mello-Roos and which don’t? Ideally it would be a map with colored regions showing MR areas. My only way of getting this info right now is looking at MLS listings (some listings say whether or not there’s MR) and getting a rough idea over time which regions are MR regions. There’s gotta be an easier and more reliable way.
May 1, 2009 at 11:00 AM #391565ybitzParticipantAre there any data out there that compiles which areas have Mello-Roos and which don’t? Ideally it would be a map with colored regions showing MR areas. My only way of getting this info right now is looking at MLS listings (some listings say whether or not there’s MR) and getting a rough idea over time which regions are MR regions. There’s gotta be an easier and more reliable way.
May 1, 2009 at 11:00 AM #391706ybitzParticipantAre there any data out there that compiles which areas have Mello-Roos and which don’t? Ideally it would be a map with colored regions showing MR areas. My only way of getting this info right now is looking at MLS listings (some listings say whether or not there’s MR) and getting a rough idea over time which regions are MR regions. There’s gotta be an easier and more reliable way.
May 1, 2009 at 2:21 PM #391240PadreBrianParticipantThe MR is broken down on your bill, if you are so inclined you could break it out and deduct the stuff that doesn’t increase value on the property. This is a moot point anyway, most people just use the amount on their 1098 which is reported to the IRS by the bank.
May 1, 2009 at 2:21 PM #391503PadreBrianParticipantThe MR is broken down on your bill, if you are so inclined you could break it out and deduct the stuff that doesn’t increase value on the property. This is a moot point anyway, most people just use the amount on their 1098 which is reported to the IRS by the bank.
May 1, 2009 at 2:21 PM #391712PadreBrianParticipantThe MR is broken down on your bill, if you are so inclined you could break it out and deduct the stuff that doesn’t increase value on the property. This is a moot point anyway, most people just use the amount on their 1098 which is reported to the IRS by the bank.
May 1, 2009 at 2:21 PM #391765PadreBrianParticipantThe MR is broken down on your bill, if you are so inclined you could break it out and deduct the stuff that doesn’t increase value on the property. This is a moot point anyway, most people just use the amount on their 1098 which is reported to the IRS by the bank.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.