- This topic has 115 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 7 months ago by Nor-LA-SD-guy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 28, 2010 at 5:19 AM #17278March 28, 2010 at 5:33 AM #532490EconProfParticipant
The government is in a quandry: they need construction to build more residential and commercial buildings in order for the economy to revive. Yet the solution to the real estate glut of all categories is to NOT build for several years, allowing demand to sop up the accumulated surplus.
We are in the morning after/hangover stage, which must last a while longer.March 28, 2010 at 5:33 AM #532618EconProfParticipantThe government is in a quandry: they need construction to build more residential and commercial buildings in order for the economy to revive. Yet the solution to the real estate glut of all categories is to NOT build for several years, allowing demand to sop up the accumulated surplus.
We are in the morning after/hangover stage, which must last a while longer.March 28, 2010 at 5:33 AM #533070EconProfParticipantThe government is in a quandry: they need construction to build more residential and commercial buildings in order for the economy to revive. Yet the solution to the real estate glut of all categories is to NOT build for several years, allowing demand to sop up the accumulated surplus.
We are in the morning after/hangover stage, which must last a while longer.March 28, 2010 at 5:33 AM #533166EconProfParticipantThe government is in a quandry: they need construction to build more residential and commercial buildings in order for the economy to revive. Yet the solution to the real estate glut of all categories is to NOT build for several years, allowing demand to sop up the accumulated surplus.
We are in the morning after/hangover stage, which must last a while longer.March 28, 2010 at 5:33 AM #533426EconProfParticipantThe government is in a quandry: they need construction to build more residential and commercial buildings in order for the economy to revive. Yet the solution to the real estate glut of all categories is to NOT build for several years, allowing demand to sop up the accumulated surplus.
We are in the morning after/hangover stage, which must last a while longer.March 28, 2010 at 6:17 AM #532495ArrayaParticipantI agree, we should not be building. It’s huge gamble.
Especially, now that it looks like we depleted demand again. Also:
– delinquencies rose again to 14%(shadow increase)
– sales slump
– strategic default increase(principle reductions right on time to nip this in the bud)I think we are in the “drink to function” stage of a multi-decade bender on our last bottle before detox.
March 28, 2010 at 6:17 AM #532623ArrayaParticipantI agree, we should not be building. It’s huge gamble.
Especially, now that it looks like we depleted demand again. Also:
– delinquencies rose again to 14%(shadow increase)
– sales slump
– strategic default increase(principle reductions right on time to nip this in the bud)I think we are in the “drink to function” stage of a multi-decade bender on our last bottle before detox.
March 28, 2010 at 6:17 AM #533075ArrayaParticipantI agree, we should not be building. It’s huge gamble.
Especially, now that it looks like we depleted demand again. Also:
– delinquencies rose again to 14%(shadow increase)
– sales slump
– strategic default increase(principle reductions right on time to nip this in the bud)I think we are in the “drink to function” stage of a multi-decade bender on our last bottle before detox.
March 28, 2010 at 6:17 AM #533171ArrayaParticipantI agree, we should not be building. It’s huge gamble.
Especially, now that it looks like we depleted demand again. Also:
– delinquencies rose again to 14%(shadow increase)
– sales slump
– strategic default increase(principle reductions right on time to nip this in the bud)I think we are in the “drink to function” stage of a multi-decade bender on our last bottle before detox.
March 28, 2010 at 6:17 AM #533431ArrayaParticipantI agree, we should not be building. It’s huge gamble.
Especially, now that it looks like we depleted demand again. Also:
– delinquencies rose again to 14%(shadow increase)
– sales slump
– strategic default increase(principle reductions right on time to nip this in the bud)I think we are in the “drink to function” stage of a multi-decade bender on our last bottle before detox.
March 28, 2010 at 8:37 AM #532510jpinpbParticipant[quote=EconProf]We are in the morning after/hangover stage, which must last a while longer.[/quote]
How to avoid a hangover? Keep drinking.
I’d say they are doing everything possible to not feel the pain and spending (drinking).
March 28, 2010 at 8:37 AM #532637jpinpbParticipant[quote=EconProf]We are in the morning after/hangover stage, which must last a while longer.[/quote]
How to avoid a hangover? Keep drinking.
I’d say they are doing everything possible to not feel the pain and spending (drinking).
March 28, 2010 at 8:37 AM #533090jpinpbParticipant[quote=EconProf]We are in the morning after/hangover stage, which must last a while longer.[/quote]
How to avoid a hangover? Keep drinking.
I’d say they are doing everything possible to not feel the pain and spending (drinking).
March 28, 2010 at 8:37 AM #533185jpinpbParticipant[quote=EconProf]We are in the morning after/hangover stage, which must last a while longer.[/quote]
How to avoid a hangover? Keep drinking.
I’d say they are doing everything possible to not feel the pain and spending (drinking).
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.