- This topic has 115 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 10 months ago by
Nor-LA-SD-guy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 28, 2010 at 5:19 AM #17278March 28, 2010 at 5:33 AM #532490
EconProf
ParticipantThe government is in a quandry: they need construction to build more residential and commercial buildings in order for the economy to revive. Yet the solution to the real estate glut of all categories is to NOT build for several years, allowing demand to sop up the accumulated surplus.
We are in the morning after/hangover stage, which must last a while longer.March 28, 2010 at 5:33 AM #532618EconProf
ParticipantThe government is in a quandry: they need construction to build more residential and commercial buildings in order for the economy to revive. Yet the solution to the real estate glut of all categories is to NOT build for several years, allowing demand to sop up the accumulated surplus.
We are in the morning after/hangover stage, which must last a while longer.March 28, 2010 at 5:33 AM #533070EconProf
ParticipantThe government is in a quandry: they need construction to build more residential and commercial buildings in order for the economy to revive. Yet the solution to the real estate glut of all categories is to NOT build for several years, allowing demand to sop up the accumulated surplus.
We are in the morning after/hangover stage, which must last a while longer.March 28, 2010 at 5:33 AM #533166EconProf
ParticipantThe government is in a quandry: they need construction to build more residential and commercial buildings in order for the economy to revive. Yet the solution to the real estate glut of all categories is to NOT build for several years, allowing demand to sop up the accumulated surplus.
We are in the morning after/hangover stage, which must last a while longer.March 28, 2010 at 5:33 AM #533426EconProf
ParticipantThe government is in a quandry: they need construction to build more residential and commercial buildings in order for the economy to revive. Yet the solution to the real estate glut of all categories is to NOT build for several years, allowing demand to sop up the accumulated surplus.
We are in the morning after/hangover stage, which must last a while longer.March 28, 2010 at 6:17 AM #532495Arraya
ParticipantI agree, we should not be building. It’s huge gamble.
Especially, now that it looks like we depleted demand again. Also:
– delinquencies rose again to 14%(shadow increase)
– sales slump
– strategic default increase(principle reductions right on time to nip this in the bud)I think we are in the “drink to function” stage of a multi-decade bender on our last bottle before detox.
March 28, 2010 at 6:17 AM #532623Arraya
ParticipantI agree, we should not be building. It’s huge gamble.
Especially, now that it looks like we depleted demand again. Also:
– delinquencies rose again to 14%(shadow increase)
– sales slump
– strategic default increase(principle reductions right on time to nip this in the bud)I think we are in the “drink to function” stage of a multi-decade bender on our last bottle before detox.
March 28, 2010 at 6:17 AM #533075Arraya
ParticipantI agree, we should not be building. It’s huge gamble.
Especially, now that it looks like we depleted demand again. Also:
– delinquencies rose again to 14%(shadow increase)
– sales slump
– strategic default increase(principle reductions right on time to nip this in the bud)I think we are in the “drink to function” stage of a multi-decade bender on our last bottle before detox.
March 28, 2010 at 6:17 AM #533171Arraya
ParticipantI agree, we should not be building. It’s huge gamble.
Especially, now that it looks like we depleted demand again. Also:
– delinquencies rose again to 14%(shadow increase)
– sales slump
– strategic default increase(principle reductions right on time to nip this in the bud)I think we are in the “drink to function” stage of a multi-decade bender on our last bottle before detox.
March 28, 2010 at 6:17 AM #533431Arraya
ParticipantI agree, we should not be building. It’s huge gamble.
Especially, now that it looks like we depleted demand again. Also:
– delinquencies rose again to 14%(shadow increase)
– sales slump
– strategic default increase(principle reductions right on time to nip this in the bud)I think we are in the “drink to function” stage of a multi-decade bender on our last bottle before detox.
March 28, 2010 at 8:37 AM #532510jpinpb
Participant[quote=EconProf]We are in the morning after/hangover stage, which must last a while longer.[/quote]
How to avoid a hangover? Keep drinking.
I’d say they are doing everything possible to not feel the pain and spending (drinking).
March 28, 2010 at 8:37 AM #532637jpinpb
Participant[quote=EconProf]We are in the morning after/hangover stage, which must last a while longer.[/quote]
How to avoid a hangover? Keep drinking.
I’d say they are doing everything possible to not feel the pain and spending (drinking).
March 28, 2010 at 8:37 AM #533090jpinpb
Participant[quote=EconProf]We are in the morning after/hangover stage, which must last a while longer.[/quote]
How to avoid a hangover? Keep drinking.
I’d say they are doing everything possible to not feel the pain and spending (drinking).
March 28, 2010 at 8:37 AM #533185jpinpb
Participant[quote=EconProf]We are in the morning after/hangover stage, which must last a while longer.[/quote]
How to avoid a hangover? Keep drinking.
I’d say they are doing everything possible to not feel the pain and spending (drinking).
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.