- This topic has 85 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 4 months ago by
paramount.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 24, 2011 at 4:04 PM #712465July 24, 2011 at 5:21 PM #713083
bearishgurl
ParticipantPiggs, does anyone know the ratio of multifamily units to SFR’s in 92014 (DM)? I am of the belief that it is about 65% multifamily and 35% single family. Perhaps the multifamily figure is higher?
July 24, 2011 at 5:21 PM #712389ParticipantPiggs, does anyone know the ratio of multifamily units to SFR’s in 92014 (DM)? I am of the belief that it is about 65% multifamily and 35% single family. Perhaps the multifamily figure is higher?
July 24, 2011 at 5:21 PM #713235ParticipantPiggs, does anyone know the ratio of multifamily units to SFR’s in 92014 (DM)? I am of the belief that it is about 65% multifamily and 35% single family. Perhaps the multifamily figure is higher?
July 24, 2011 at 5:21 PM #712485ParticipantPiggs, does anyone know the ratio of multifamily units to SFR’s in 92014 (DM)? I am of the belief that it is about 65% multifamily and 35% single family. Perhaps the multifamily figure is higher?
July 24, 2011 at 5:21 PM #713594ParticipantPiggs, does anyone know the ratio of multifamily units to SFR’s in 92014 (DM)? I am of the belief that it is about 65% multifamily and 35% single family. Perhaps the multifamily figure is higher?
July 24, 2011 at 5:31 PM #713599njtosd
Participant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=njtosd][quote=sdrealtor]Most coveted by whom?[/quote]I have to agree with sdr. The basic rules of supply and demand would suggest that the most coveted residences would be the ones with the highest price per square foot. La Jolla, RSF and Del Mar all have higher prices per square foot than 92106, La Jolla and RSF being about 20% more (according to Trulia). There might be others – but I think BG has mixed up what she covets with what most people covet.[/quote]
Actually, I believe SFR’s in 92106 far outnumber the SFR’s in 92014 and 92067 (not sure about 92037). Therefore, there are likely many more listings and sales in 92106 than the other areas.
In addition, there are Section 8 units (likely NOT complexes) in 92037 and 92014 but not in 92067.[/quote]
BG – I don’t see any response to my argument. The number of units in a locality doesn’t influence its desirability . . Price per square foot is as close as you can come to an apples to apples comparison.
July 24, 2011 at 5:31 PM #712394Participant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=njtosd][quote=sdrealtor]Most coveted by whom?[/quote]I have to agree with sdr. The basic rules of supply and demand would suggest that the most coveted residences would be the ones with the highest price per square foot. La Jolla, RSF and Del Mar all have higher prices per square foot than 92106, La Jolla and RSF being about 20% more (according to Trulia). There might be others – but I think BG has mixed up what she covets with what most people covet.[/quote]
Actually, I believe SFR’s in 92106 far outnumber the SFR’s in 92014 and 92067 (not sure about 92037). Therefore, there are likely many more listings and sales in 92106 than the other areas.
In addition, there are Section 8 units (likely NOT complexes) in 92037 and 92014 but not in 92067.[/quote]
BG – I don’t see any response to my argument. The number of units in a locality doesn’t influence its desirability . . Price per square foot is as close as you can come to an apples to apples comparison.
July 24, 2011 at 5:31 PM #712490Participant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=njtosd][quote=sdrealtor]Most coveted by whom?[/quote]I have to agree with sdr. The basic rules of supply and demand would suggest that the most coveted residences would be the ones with the highest price per square foot. La Jolla, RSF and Del Mar all have higher prices per square foot than 92106, La Jolla and RSF being about 20% more (according to Trulia). There might be others – but I think BG has mixed up what she covets with what most people covet.[/quote]
Actually, I believe SFR’s in 92106 far outnumber the SFR’s in 92014 and 92067 (not sure about 92037). Therefore, there are likely many more listings and sales in 92106 than the other areas.
In addition, there are Section 8 units (likely NOT complexes) in 92037 and 92014 but not in 92067.[/quote]
BG – I don’t see any response to my argument. The number of units in a locality doesn’t influence its desirability . . Price per square foot is as close as you can come to an apples to apples comparison.
July 24, 2011 at 5:31 PM #713240Participant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=njtosd][quote=sdrealtor]Most coveted by whom?[/quote]I have to agree with sdr. The basic rules of supply and demand would suggest that the most coveted residences would be the ones with the highest price per square foot. La Jolla, RSF and Del Mar all have higher prices per square foot than 92106, La Jolla and RSF being about 20% more (according to Trulia). There might be others – but I think BG has mixed up what she covets with what most people covet.[/quote]
Actually, I believe SFR’s in 92106 far outnumber the SFR’s in 92014 and 92067 (not sure about 92037). Therefore, there are likely many more listings and sales in 92106 than the other areas.
In addition, there are Section 8 units (likely NOT complexes) in 92037 and 92014 but not in 92067.[/quote]
BG – I don’t see any response to my argument. The number of units in a locality doesn’t influence its desirability . . Price per square foot is as close as you can come to an apples to apples comparison.
July 24, 2011 at 5:31 PM #713088Participant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=njtosd][quote=sdrealtor]Most coveted by whom?[/quote]I have to agree with sdr. The basic rules of supply and demand would suggest that the most coveted residences would be the ones with the highest price per square foot. La Jolla, RSF and Del Mar all have higher prices per square foot than 92106, La Jolla and RSF being about 20% more (according to Trulia). There might be others – but I think BG has mixed up what she covets with what most people covet.[/quote]
Actually, I believe SFR’s in 92106 far outnumber the SFR’s in 92014 and 92067 (not sure about 92037). Therefore, there are likely many more listings and sales in 92106 than the other areas.
In addition, there are Section 8 units (likely NOT complexes) in 92037 and 92014 but not in 92067.[/quote]
BG – I don’t see any response to my argument. The number of units in a locality doesn’t influence its desirability . . Price per square foot is as close as you can come to an apples to apples comparison.
July 24, 2011 at 5:36 PM #713609Happs
ParticipantThanks for the explanation. Since it’s a private landlord based program in SD County, I suppose then it’s up to the landlord and apartment manager to enforce quality of life issues in the complex. So ultimately the neighbors are at the mercy of the landlord. IF you do an internet search on Section 8 crime, there is still a propensity for higher crime in a Section 8 complex vs non, despite the criminal background checks of the tenants. I hope the project on Sierra Ave in Solana Beach won’t end up in disrepair and residents afraid to walk by.
July 24, 2011 at 5:36 PM #713250ParticipantThanks for the explanation. Since it’s a private landlord based program in SD County, I suppose then it’s up to the landlord and apartment manager to enforce quality of life issues in the complex. So ultimately the neighbors are at the mercy of the landlord. IF you do an internet search on Section 8 crime, there is still a propensity for higher crime in a Section 8 complex vs non, despite the criminal background checks of the tenants. I hope the project on Sierra Ave in Solana Beach won’t end up in disrepair and residents afraid to walk by.
July 24, 2011 at 5:36 PM #712404ParticipantThanks for the explanation. Since it’s a private landlord based program in SD County, I suppose then it’s up to the landlord and apartment manager to enforce quality of life issues in the complex. So ultimately the neighbors are at the mercy of the landlord. IF you do an internet search on Section 8 crime, there is still a propensity for higher crime in a Section 8 complex vs non, despite the criminal background checks of the tenants. I hope the project on Sierra Ave in Solana Beach won’t end up in disrepair and residents afraid to walk by.
July 24, 2011 at 5:36 PM #713097ParticipantThanks for the explanation. Since it’s a private landlord based program in SD County, I suppose then it’s up to the landlord and apartment manager to enforce quality of life issues in the complex. So ultimately the neighbors are at the mercy of the landlord. IF you do an internet search on Section 8 crime, there is still a propensity for higher crime in a Section 8 complex vs non, despite the criminal background checks of the tenants. I hope the project on Sierra Ave in Solana Beach won’t end up in disrepair and residents afraid to walk by.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.