Low Income Housing Effect on Property Values?

[bearishgurl]

Here’s a local link (Board letter) I found dated 2003 that states that in order to receive a “Section 8” voucher, an applicant must have submitted to a criminal background check. However, these tenants did not have to keep their criminal background check current during their tenancy. Supvsr Cox proposed that these recipients should have to report any criminal conviction they sustained while a tenant to the County Housing Authority. Don’t know if this new ordinance was ever passed by the BOS.

Of course, enforcement could be problematic and also labor-intensive.

http://www.sdcounty.ca.gov/bos1/legislation/leg040211.html

[bearishgurl]

Oh, and I forgot to mention that the majority of rental complexes in 92107 (also adjacent to 92106) accept Section 8. In fact, this zip code may be one of the zip codes in the county sporting the MOST “Section 8” tenants :-}

IMO, the most coveted residences in this county lie within 92106 . . . by far. And it’s wedged between TWO Section 8/govm’t housing locales.

You can’t get away from Section 8, unless you live within a Covenant. So my advice is to “get over it” and be happy :=)

[bearishgurl]

Oh, and I forgot to mention that the majority of rental complexes in 92107 (also adjacent to 92106) accept Section 8. In fact, this zip code may be one of the zip codes in the county sporting the MOST “Section 8” tenants :-}

IMO, the most coveted residences in this county lie within 92106 . . . by far. And it’s wedged between TWO Section 8/govm’t housing locales.

You can’t get away from Section 8, unless you live within a Covenant. So my advice is to “get over it” and be happy :=)

[bearishgurl]

Oh, and I forgot to mention that the majority of rental complexes in 92107 (also adjacent to 92106) accept Section 8. In fact, this zip code may be one of the zip codes in the county sporting the MOST “Section 8” tenants :-}

IMO, the most coveted residences in this county lie within 92106 . . . by far. And it’s wedged between TWO Section 8/govm’t housing locales.

You can’t get away from Section 8, unless you live within a Covenant. So my advice is to “get over it” and be happy :=)

[bearishgurl]

Oh, and I forgot to mention that the majority of rental complexes in 92107 (also adjacent to 92106) accept Section 8. In fact, this zip code may be one of the zip codes in the county sporting the MOST “Section 8” tenants :-}

IMO, the most coveted residences in this county lie within 92106 . . . by far. And it’s wedged between TWO Section 8/govm’t housing locales.

You can’t get away from Section 8, unless you live within a Covenant. So my advice is to “get over it” and be happy :=)

[bearishgurl]

Oh, and I forgot to mention that the majority of rental complexes in 92107 (also adjacent to 92106) accept Section 8. In fact, this zip code may be one of the zip codes in the county sporting the MOST “Section 8” tenants :-}

IMO, the most coveted residences in this county lie within 92106 . . . by far. And it’s wedged between TWO Section 8/govm’t housing locales.

You can’t get away from Section 8, unless you live within a Covenant. So my advice is to “get over it” and be happy :=)

[Happs]

So if the naked eye can’t distinguish Section 8 housing from regular housing, then a prospective buyer probably won’t know there is such a complex across or down the street? Would the seller need to disclose a low income housing project on the disclosure form when you sell a house/condo?

I can “get over it” if the tenants are upstanding and I don’t see police cars on a regular basis.

[Happs]

So if the naked eye can’t distinguish Section 8 housing from regular housing, then a prospective buyer probably won’t know there is such a complex across or down the street? Would the seller need to disclose a low income housing project on the disclosure form when you sell a house/condo?

I can “get over it” if the tenants are upstanding and I don’t see police cars on a regular basis.

[Happs]

So if the naked eye can’t distinguish Section 8 housing from regular housing, then a prospective buyer probably won’t know there is such a complex across or down the street? Would the seller need to disclose a low income housing project on the disclosure form when you sell a house/condo?

I can “get over it” if the tenants are upstanding and I don’t see police cars on a regular basis.

[Happs]

So if the naked eye can’t distinguish Section 8 housing from regular housing, then a prospective buyer probably won’t know there is such a complex across or down the street? Would the seller need to disclose a low income housing project on the disclosure form when you sell a house/condo?

I can “get over it” if the tenants are upstanding and I don’t see police cars on a regular basis.

[Happs]

So if the naked eye can’t distinguish Section 8 housing from regular housing, then a prospective buyer probably won’t know there is such a complex across or down the street? Would the seller need to disclose a low income housing project on the disclosure form when you sell a house/condo?

I can “get over it” if the tenants are upstanding and I don’t see police cars on a regular basis.

[sdrealtor]

[quote=bearishgurl]Oh, and I forgot to mention that the majority of rental complexes in 92107 (also adjacent to 92106) accept Section 8. In fact, this zip code may be one of the zip codes in the county sporting the MOST “Section 8” tenants :-}

IMO, the most coveted residences in this county lie within 92106 . . . by far. And it’s wedged between TWO Section 8/govm’t housing locales.

You can’t get away from Section 8, unless you live within a Covenant. So my advice is to “get over it” and be happy :=)[/quote]

Most coveted by whom?

[sdrealtor]

[quote=bearishgurl]Oh, and I forgot to mention that the majority of rental complexes in 92107 (also adjacent to 92106) accept Section 8. In fact, this zip code may be one of the zip codes in the county sporting the MOST “Section 8” tenants :-}

IMO, the most coveted residences in this county lie within 92106 . . . by far. And it’s wedged between TWO Section 8/govm’t housing locales.

You can’t get away from Section 8, unless you live within a Covenant. So my advice is to “get over it” and be happy :=)[/quote]

Most coveted by whom?

[sdrealtor]

[quote=bearishgurl]Oh, and I forgot to mention that the majority of rental complexes in 92107 (also adjacent to 92106) accept Section 8. In fact, this zip code may be one of the zip codes in the county sporting the MOST “Section 8” tenants :-}

IMO, the most coveted residences in this county lie within 92106 . . . by far. And it’s wedged between TWO Section 8/govm’t housing locales.

You can’t get away from Section 8, unless you live within a Covenant. So my advice is to “get over it” and be happy :=)[/quote]

Most coveted by whom?

[sdrealtor]

[quote=bearishgurl]Oh, and I forgot to mention that the majority of rental complexes in 92107 (also adjacent to 92106) accept Section 8. In fact, this zip code may be one of the zip codes in the county sporting the MOST “Section 8” tenants :-}

IMO, the most coveted residences in this county lie within 92106 . . . by far. And it’s wedged between TWO Section 8/govm’t housing locales.

You can’t get away from Section 8, unless you live within a Covenant. So my advice is to “get over it” and be happy :=)[/quote]

Most coveted by whom?

[Author]

Posts